Media Updates

A friendly reader posted a link to where my appearances on Family News In Focus responding to Sen. Kerry’s speech involving religion can be found:

IT’S HERE. (.wax format; works with Windows Media Player; my segment starts a little after 3:30 minutes into the broadcast)

I also was able to find a link to my appearance on California NRP talking about stem cells:

IT’S HERE. (.asx format; works with Windows Media Player; my segment starts about 20 minutes into the hour)

This morning I’m sheduled to appear on XETV FOX channel 6 (the local San Diego FOX station) to talk about stem cells again. I should be on about 7:15 a.m., though the segment should be short.

MORE INFO ON CALIFORNIA’S PRO-STEM CELL PROP 71 HERE.

If it gets passed in this state, it will create competition among other states to fund similar initiatives, lest they get left behind in a “stem cell race.”

Escatology Update

A reader points out to me that . . . .

ANDREW SULLIVAN PRINTS AN E-MAIL CALLING INTO QUESTION THE LITERALNESS OF LUTHER’S STATEMENT THAT HE HAD HIS PROFOUND, REFORMATIONAL INSIGHT IN CLOACA.

(POTTY-MOUTH WARNING!)

Don’t know whether this is true or not, but it might be.

I also should point out something I forgot to mention the other day: The stories you read about Luther posting the 95 Theses on a church door may well be false.

More On Mentalese

Regarding our recent discussion of deafness and mentalese, a reader writes:

But what about deaf people who don’t know sign language? I recently read an article that claimed a surprising number of deaf people don’t know sign language, or at least don’t know it very well, especially deaf children who grow up with parents who have normal hearing. So how do they think? Or what about deaf people in remote areas who never encounter sign language? They are obviously thinking somehow but what form do the thoughts take?

If a person were totally deprived of language–both spoken, gestural, and anything else one might propose–then the person would have no option but to think in pure mentalese.

That being said, it isn’t clear to me how common completely language-less people are. I question whether they even exist. The language instinct is so strong in humans that the accounts I have read indicate that even deaf people not exposed to a formal sign languages come up with informal signs.

Recently I was reading an account of a deaf man from Mexico who was never exposed to formal signing. This gentleman not only was able to get across the border with the United States, he was able to survive in the Los Angeles area. When he was discovered, he did not know any established language, including sign languages. An effort was made to teach him a sign language, and soon he “made the breakthrough.” Afterwards, he not only was able to describe his prior experience, he also was able to lead those working with him to other non-signing deaf individuals, who were more common than had been known.

These individuals had a network amongst themselves that had previously escaped notice. Despite their lack of conventional language, they had found ways to communicate with each other and often entertained each others with elaborate pantomimes describing their experiences.

This suggests that the language instinct in humans is so strong that even in the absence of exposure to a formal language, they will come up with an informal one.

This suggests that even these individuals may not think in pure mentalese but might have an accompanying “translation” of their thoughts into the informal gestural methods of communication they invent.

It would be fascinating to have better data on this, however.

Escatology Update

A reader points out to me that . . . .

ANDREW SULLIVAN PRINTS AN E-MAIL CALLING INTO QUESTION THE LITERALNESS OF LUTHER’S STATEMENT THAT HE HAD HIS PROFOUND, REFORMATIONAL INSIGHT IN CLOACA.

(POTTY-MOUTH WARNING!)

Don’t know whether this is true or not, but it might be.

I also should point out something I forgot to mention the other day: The stories you read about Luther posting the 95 Theses on a church door may well be false.

Compendium Question

A reader writes:

Can you give us some guidance on your blog regarding the new Compendium [of the Church’s social teachings] that came out this week?

How do we answer critics who say that it elevates lesser social issues to a position on par with pro-life issues?

I am very reluctant to comment on a text without having the chance to examine it firsthand. This is why I haven’t commented on the Comendium thus far. For an unknown reason, it doesn’t seem to have yet been posted online, and although I put in a request to have a hardcopy shipped to us extra-expedited, it hasn’t yet arrived (probably will arrive late this week or early next), and I’ll be in a better position to comment at that time.

Despite this, the question that you pose is one that I can comment on at least briefly, as follows:

It would be almost inconceivable, given the stress that the Holy See has placed on abortion and related pro-life questions (euthanasia, embryonic stem cells, etc.), that the text would elevate lesser social issues to the point that they are on the same level as these.

Basically, people who are saying that it does this (a) are commenting on the text without having read it themselves and (b) commenting on it in a particularly brain-dead way, as it would be completely contrary to the way that Rome has been speaking about the relative gravity of these issues.

HERE’S A STORY THAT ALSO MAY BE USEFUL.

AND HERE’S ANOTHER.

Lunar Eclipse Tonight!

LunareclipseThere’s going to be a total eclipse of the moon tonight, and North America has the best seat in the house for it.

You may be able to catch the eclipse on FOX, as it will occur during the World Series game that FOX is broadcasting.

For full viewing instructions, including when totality will occur in your timezone, as well as background on what a lunar eclipse is, etc., GO HERE.

For those in the continental US, totality (which lasts less than 5 min.) will occur at 7:18 Pacific, 8:18 Mountain, 9:18 Central, and 10:18 Eastern.

Enjoy!

P.S. Unlike an eclipse of the sun, you can look directly at an eclipse of the moon!

Chaput Wants Abortion Kaput

Excerts from NYT editorial by the good Archbishop:

Words are cheap. Actions matter. If we believe in the sanctity of life from conception to natural death, we need to prove that by our actions, including our political choices. Anything less leads to the corruption of our integrity. Patriotism, which is a virtue for people of all faiths, requires that we fight, ethically and nonviolently, for what we believe. Claiming that “we don’t want to impose our beliefs on society” is not merely politically convenient; it is morally incoherent and irresponsible.

As James 2:17 reminds us, in a passage quoted in the final presidential debate, “Faith without works is dead.” It is a valid point. People should act on what they claim to believe. Otherwise they are violating their own conscience, and lying to themselves and the rest of us.

Schwing!

READ THE EDITORIAL (Evil NYT-noid Registration Warning).

UPDATE: BTW, I should mention that Archbishop Chaput’s last name does not rhyme with “kaput.” The T on the end of his name is silent and the U is long.

Mentalese To ASL Translation

Concerning my recent post on Thinking Without Words, a reader writes:

What about people who are deaf from birth? How do they think? Do they make up their own words? Or do they think without words, in a form of mentalese?

Good question!

This is something I was thinking about a while back (actually, about twenty years ago), so I asked one of my cousins, who was born deaf.

He responded that he sees people signing in his head reflecting his internal monologue.

Deaf folks have the same translation reflex that we do, they just translate their mentalese into a gestural language (typically ASL or American Sign Language here in America) rather than into a spoken language (like English).

In a related question that occurred to me, I wondered what people blind from birth associate with colors. It occurred to me that they would likely associate colors with tactile sensations–their minds filling in something they are familiar with (tactile sensations) for something they aren’t familiar with (colors).

So I asked a blind friend and he told me that it was indeed true: He associated the color red with the tactile sensation of heat, the color green with the tactile sensation of handling a dollar bill, and the color yellow with the feeling of touching a little yellow wooden bench he sat on when he was a small child. He hadn’t ever seen these colors, but he formed the tactile substitute impressions for the colors based on what others told him about things having these colors (i.e., things that are “red hot,” “greenbacks,” and in his own case, a yellow child’s bench).

Amazing how the human mind works, isn’t it!

Couple of Media Appearances

Today I’m going to be on Family News In Focus, a production of Focus on the Family that is heard on many/most Protestant radio stations. I’m giving reaction to Sen. Kerry’s recent speech involving his Catholic faith and the role it does/doesn’t play in his political views. Check your local Protestant radio station’s listings for times if you’d like to catch it. Gave them the soundbites today. Don’t know how it’ll sound once they do the editing, but you might tune in.

On Wednesday I’m going to be on a state-wide PBS radio broadcast in California debating stem cells. It’s scheduled to run from 10 a.m.-11 a.m. on all the public radio stations in California. My opponent will be a researcher who I’ve debated a number of times before on this subject. Despite his views of stem cells, he’s a nice guy. He also works with mouse embryos, not human ones, which is a good thing (or I’d have to deck him). Given the liberal NPR audience, any pro-life Californians who read this and would like to call in on the show would be welcome!