“Baby Got Book!”

BabygotbookA reader writes:

Perhaps, you’ve seen this music video—“baby got book”–but I had to flag it all the same. My best friend who is a Baptist sent me this link. I found it very funny and its two references to Catholicism were lighthearted and friendly. According to his bio, the singer “south paw,” a graduate of Kentucky Christian University on a full ride tetherball scholarship, started his own “new, super cool church in Cleveland Ohio.” Perhaps, good clean humor can foster dialog amongst different religious groups? Sure takes a little of the pressure off.

Thanks for the link. I’d seen the video a piece back and thought seriously about blogging it, because it is quite funny–and moreso the more you know about Bibles. I also appreciated the two Catholic-friendly references in the video, especially the second. When I heard the second, I thought, "Oh, he didn’t have to do that. That was real nice!"

The thing that stopped me from doing so was . . . well . . . my almost total ignorance of rap music. I got the feeling watching the video that there were references to different secular rap songs in it, and I was concerned that some of these might be to offensive rap songs, even though this video itself is totally clean. In fact, I know that there’s at least one reference of that nature to a highly offensive rap song in the vid. What they do is turn the reference on it’s head so that it’s a kind of totally-clean poke at the offensive song, but–as the Emperor Cartagia explained–"Humor is such a subjective thing."

Having said that, if you’re willing to take the risk of seeing a clean Christian parody of offensive rap stuff,

GET THE VIDEO.

St. Mr. T?

Saint_mr_tA reader writes:

I am fascinated by the person popularly known as Mr.T. He is such a
curiosity that I cannot seem to put him out of my mind. I wonder
about things like "Does he go to bed with his jewelry on?" "Is he
always Mr.T or does he become Mr.Other Name when he gets home after a
day of work?" "Is his father, T Senior (presumably), ashamed that his
son did not pursue a more respectable career as a scientist named Dr.
Q?" "Does he eat his own cereal?" "Does he wear more or less jewelry
when going to weddings?" Such a human enigma!

I don’t have definite information on all of these questions, though here’s what information I have:

According to Wikipedia’s entry on him, Mr. T was born Laurence Tureaud, though that’s not his name now. He changed his name to Laurence Tero and then to Mr. T. Literally: Mr. T. He therefore does not go home and have another name. He also does not seem to go to bed with the jewelery on–at least anymore–since it appears that he gave up wearing the jewelery (at least the chains) after he became involved in relief efforts following Hurricane Katrina last year. He did, however, sometimes wear it to bed in the past, "to see how my ancestors, who were slaves, felt." Since givingup the chains, he presumably doesn’t wear them to weddings now, either. I would assume that he has eaten his own cereal at least once. I know if I were joing to license a cereal, I would want to make sure it tastes okay. And I’d hope that his father is proud of him given how successful he’s been.

The reader continues:

Then I wondered what would happen to him if he were to A) Convert to
Catholicism and live an exemplary life (not that I am judging his
current life) and B) Die and finally C) Become canonized — what
would we call this saint? Would it be St.Mr.T with both titles (saint
and mister) or would the St. just replace the Mr. and we would just
call him St.T?

Somehow St. T just does not have the same weight as Mr.T. I think it
is the second syllable in mister that makes the name really work. It
is kind of like growling when you say it "Mis-TERRR".

It seems in general titles earned in this life are dropped when the
St. is added. For example, it is not St. Sister Therese but just
plain old St. Therese. The only sort of exception to this would be
the nickname that goes after the name to distinguish this St. First
Name from other saints First Name. For example St. Therese the Little
Flower.

In such a case, I wonder if it would be appropriate to refer to him
as St.T of the Mister or something like that.

Anyway, I was just curious about titles and how they work with saints
and wondered if you could provide any insight into that whole thing.

Mr. T apparently is a Christian, who is reported to take his faith seriously these days. If he were to become a Catholic and (at least henceforth) lead a life of heroic virtue then he would potentially be eligible for formal canonization.

Should he be canonized then–at least as things stand now–he would be referred to as St. Mr. T because the Mr. is an actual part of his name. It is not an honoriffic, but the first part of his legal name.

Of course, if he had aspirations toward canonization then he might change his name again–perhaps back to Laurence Tureaud, but as things stand now, it would be St. Mr. T.

Hope this clears up some of the mystery surrounding this human enigma!

CHT to The Curt Jester for Photoshopping the above image, and especially for his creative take on what kind of halo St. Mr. T would have!

 

Flying Under The Influence

Pelican_1

Class, for today’s Journalism 101 lesson we’ll learn how to meet deadlines by plumping up odd incidents into gripping news events.

The story of a sick pelican crashing into a car may not seem to the layman to make for particularly interesting news. But on a slow news day you too can learn how to massage it into headline-worthy material. Let’s see…. How about saying the pelican was intoxicated and is now being held on suspicion of flying under the influence? But nobody would believe it! Or would they?

Calif. pelicans held on suspicion of being drunk

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) — "Four pelicans suspected of being drunk on sea algae were being tested at a Southern California wildlife centre on Saturday after one of them crashed headlong into a car.

"Three of the California brown pelicans were found wandering dazed in the streets of Laguna Beach after another pelican struck a vehicle’s windscreen on a nearby coast road.

"It suffered internal injuries and a long gash in its pouch and was undergoing toxicology tests.

"Officials at the Wildlife Care Centre said the seabirds may have been under the influence of algae in the ocean that can produce domoic acid poisoning when eaten."

GET THE STORY.

And that, my young journalistic apprentices, is how you turn a Non-Story into a Story.

On The Road

I thought I’d share with y’all a couple of pictures I took on my recent trip to go square dancing in Phoenix a couple of weeks ago.

The first is a picture of the sign you see when you enter the town of Gila Bend, Arizona. A number of desert communities have humorous or otherwise interesting signs, and I particularly like Gila Bend’s (click to enlarge):

Gila_bend

The second picture is one I took in Imperial County, California, where the Salton Sea is located. The Salton Sea is the lowest body of water in the United States–a couple hundred feet below sea level, making it American’s equivalent to the Dead Sea. But you don’t have a body of water be that low without the surrounding land being low, too, and so on many various buildings in Imperial County you’ll see elevation markers like this one (click to enlarge):

Sea_level_1

666

A reader writes:

Might be interesting to do a thing on 666  since today is 06.06.06

True.

Apparently a lot of folks have been making a big deal out of this.

Drudge is running a headline "APOCALYPSE? 666 arrives . . . " which links to

THIS GUY.

Myself, I’d put it in the curio category, since we get one of these days every hundred years, and the last I checked, the world didn’t end on July 6th, 1906–or 1806, or 1706 or any of the preceding centuries.

Of course,

THAT DOESN’T MEAN IT’S NOT A GOOD DATE FOR HOLLYWOOD TO RELEASE MOVIES OF A CERTAIN NATURE.

But if you want to find out what 666 is really all about, I wouldn’t suggest that you visit your local cineplex but just

GET THE STORY.

MORE HERE.

AND HERE.