A reader writes:
Are you familiar with a book by David Chilton called Days of Vengence: An Exposition of the Book of Revelation? If you have heard of it I was wondering if you had an opinion on it.
For those who may not be aware of it, Days of Vengeance is a book written in the postmillennialist Protestant tradition. In particular, it’s part of the neo-postmillennialism that has gained popularity in theonomic circles. It is probably the most popular commentary on Revelation from this perspective.
Catholic theology doesn’t infallibly reject postmillennialism (the belief that Christ will return at the conclusion of a future golden age of Christianity on earth), but it does strongly resist the idea (see CCC 673-677). The Catholic position is what in Protestant terms would be described as “amillennialism” (the belief that the present Church age is the millennium in which Christ and the saints reign from heaven and, thorugh the Church, on earth).
Days of Vengeance, when it comes down to the crunch-chapter of Revelation 20 (which deals with the millennium) suddenly starts extending olive branches to the amillennialist position, but most of the book is informed by the kind of arrogant postmillennialism that makes many theonomic writings simply insufferable. It also has loads of WAY speculative stuff in it that I can’t recommend.
That being said, the book can be useful if you’re willing to take it with several teaspoons of salt. It can provide help in seeing Revelation through a different set of eyes than Dispensationalists (the Left Behind crowd) see it through. If you’re willing to hold your nose when dealing with the theonomic attitude problem (Gary North’s intro to the book is particularly noxious in this regard) and exercise the critical thinking needed to cross-examine the book’s interpretations, then it can be helpful. You can download it here.
A few notes:
1) The author of the book–David Chilton–apparently later went nuts and embraced a view known as pantelism, which holds that ALL biblical prophecy (including the Second Coming of Christ) has already been fulfilled.
2) Days of Vengeance was written before Chilton became a pantelist, when he was only a preterist (a position that holds that most of the book of Revelation has already been fulfilled, but not the Second Coming).
3) One should NOT suppose, however, that Days of Vengeance is representative of preterism in general. There are other (and, in my view, better) preterist interpretations on many points than what Chilton presents, so I’d advise you to read more broadly in preterism rather than concluding that Chilton has said all that needs to be said.
4) Also, be aware that not everything that goes under the preterist name should do so. Many pantelists wish to be called preterists and so have been calling themselves this, though there is a marked difference between the two positions (pantelism, by relegating the Second Coming to the past, is heresy that is in conflict with the Nicene Creed, while preterism may well be true).
Hope this helps!