A reader writes:
Suppose that I have a very very close relative who is baptized in a mainstream protestant denomination, and who is living with his Catholic girlfriend. This relative and his girlfriend get engaged to be married and live together right up through the wedding. I try to charitably convince them that this behavior is sinful and harmful to them. May/should I attend the wedding under the following circumstances:
Before we get to the situations, let me say that the question of whether to attend any marriage is a question of prudence. You are never under a legal obligation to go (unless you are one of the parties getting married or have agreed to officiate at the wedding in some capacity required by canon law). As a result, I prefer not to give advice on whether you should attend. That’s a question of prudence, though in general it is prudent to attend the weddings of close relatives unless there is a reason not to do so (distance to travel, the marriage will be presumed invalid, etc.). So lemme answer in terms of whether I see a problem with you attending.
That said, on to the circumstances:
(1) The couple finds a priest who will marry them in a Catholic church.
No problem (the marriage is presumed valid).
(2) They get married in the groom’s protestant church, but with a Catholic dispensation.
No problem (the marriage is presumed valid).
(3) They can’t find a Catholic priest to marry them or give them a dispensation, so they get married in a protestant church without obtaining a dispensation.
Problem (the marriage is invalid).
(4) They can’t find a priest to marry them, so the bride renounces her Catholicism and they get married in a protestant church.
Problem (the marriage is presumed valid, but the Catholic party has just committed a horrible sin against the faith for the sake of the marriage).
Finally, (5) suppose they see the light and stop living together, but they get married outside the Catholic church without a dispensation.
Problem (the marriage is invalid).
I can’t recommend that you attend a marriage that is known to be or presumed to be invalid. This covers situations (3) and (5).
Situation (4) is a special case. While the marriage will be presumed valid if the Catholic party has defected from the Church by a formal act, she has done something else that creates a problem: She has objectively and very gravely sinned against against the Catholic faith by defecting from the Church. Further, her doing this is directly linked to the marriage itself: This is the occasion that has caused her to defect.
For the sake of witnessing to the truth of the faith, I could not attend a wedding where one of the parties has just done this. The marriage may be presumed to be valid (assuming nothing else is known to block its validity), but I cannot by my attendance and thus my public witness endorse the overall complex of actions, which includes her defection from the Church for the sake of the marriage.
(Note: I put this in a different category than the sexual sin being committed before the marriage because that sin was not engaged in for the sake of the marriage but for its own sake, and a valid marriage will result in the behavior no longer being sinful. Defecting from the faith under these circumstances is for the sake of the marriage and will not stop being sinful after the marriage.)
For case #4, did you mean to indicate that the marriage would be valid or invalid? You seem to have said invalid at first, and then in your explanation say that it would be presumed valid.
Perhaps I misread it.
I think this will be useful to me, too!
(Note: #4 says probably unintentionally “invalid” instead of “valid”.)
Yep, “invalid” in #4 was a typo, and my subsequent comments are correct. Sorry (again) for the confusion; I will be back on track soon….
Yes, Jimmy, you have for some time now been a propigator of Mass Confusion….
I’m was in either glorious situation 3 or 4. I was a lapsed Catholic intending to convert at some point buying the old “we worship the same God” line. Where I’m from, SW Wisc., rarely is there not a mixed wedding. Generally it is a Lutheran/Catholic match. Needless to say, I would discourage anyone from getting a mixed marriage. I’m happy in mine, but this has caused problems to say the least.
What Jimmy doesn’t mention, but does enter the picture at some point is that every lapsed/weak Catholic is telling you it is no big deal. If you do not follow the crowd, the consternation of the group comes down on you, because you may be taking your faith more seriously than they are. If I had to pick a fight any time a family member got married, I would attend no weddings at all; I probably wouldn’t be welcome in the family for that matter. I generally just try to attend to reception and excuse myself from the wedding because we have young children and don’t want to disturb the ceremony (entertainment).
As a person who always likes my opinion known, even I have stopped fighting these things. Call it the just war doctrine, a fight that can’t be won. Now if I were a priest this would be another matter. Given 6 months and a captive audience I might be able to impart the value of life and children. I might be able to impart temperance and all the other Christian values essential for a holy and edifying marriage. I might also just steer the couple to the Justice of the Peace where the couple can exchange vows before the only authority they really see in their lives.
My sister-in-law has a sexual preference for other women and may seek to do a commitment ceremony of some kind in the future. She knows how I feel about the homosexual act and we’re actually quite good friends. How might attending a commitment ceremony of this kind differ from attending an invalid marriage? I’d appreciate any thoughts.
Jimmy,
If a bridegroom sees his bride at the altar, is astonished by her beauty and feels lust towards her, should the wedding be stopped and the sin confessed before the exchange of vows?
Not a bad pick up line Phil W.
I can see it now, “Excuse me ma’am, I would really like to go out with you, but your beauty inspires lustful thoughts. Do you think we should risk going out on a date?”