. . . in the Cyber Catholics 2005 blog awards, that is!
JimmyAkin.Org has been nominated in the best apologetics blog category.
Your support is much appreciated. 🙂
. . . in the Cyber Catholics 2005 blog awards, that is!
JimmyAkin.Org has been nominated in the best apologetics blog category.
Your support is much appreciated. 🙂
This weekend I went to my local comics shop and picked up the books that had accumulated for me in December and January. As a result, last night I read the December and January issues of the Legion of Super-Heroes.
The Legion is, for sentimental reasons, my all-time favorite comic. I started reading it as a boy and fell in love with it.
It’s about a group of young superheroes in the 30th (now 31st) century. It’s also the longest-running super -hero team in existence (having first graced the pages of DC comics in 1957).
It hasn’t always been well-written or well-drawn (and so I haven’t always read it uninterrupted), but hey, it’s a boyhood favorite, and everybody’s entitled to at least one of those.
I’m mentioning it here because I’d like to recommend that comic books fans go out and pick up the two most recent issues.
The reason is that the Legion has just been "rebooted," though they aren’t using the term "reboot" in the industry literature (they’re saying it’s been "re-envisioned").
For those who may not be aware, comic books periodically write themselves into creative corners and the creators decide that the best thing to do is to start over and tell the story afresh, honoring the spirit of what went before while jettisoning all the continuity that has boxed the writers in to a corner creatively. This "do over" is known in the industry as a "reboot."
The biggest reboots in history were the transition from the Golden Age of comics to the Silver Age, which occurred in the 1950s, and the 1988 event Crisis on Infinite Earths, in which the entire DC Universe was rebooted, with the most dramatic changes happening for Superman and Wonder Woman (Batman saw his way through the Crisis relatively unscathed).
Unfortunately, Crisis didn’t do all the work that needed to be done in some corners of the DC Universe, and some titles, like the Legion of Super-Heroes have been rebooted several times since.
The last time the Legion was rebooted, DC went to comic writer wunderkind Mark Waid to do it, and he did a great job. The new Legion was more fun to read than the title had been in some time. Unfortunately, Waid left the book and eventually the writing level declined as subsequent writers boxed themselves in creatively. By the end of that run, I’d basically stopped reading the comics (though I still bought them).
In December, DC brought Waid back to reboot (er . . . "re-envision") the title once again.
After reading the first two issues of the reboot, I’m sold.
Waid has done it once again.
The book is bristling with creativity. There are lots of nods to established Legion tradition, but it’s accessible enough that a new reader can jump in and enjoy it (this being one of the principal goals of a reboot).
The art (by Barry Kitson) is really nice, with a good eye for detail and design that rises well above the pedestrian pencilling that the Legion has suffered from in recent times.
Most important for me, though, are the story and the characters.
As far as the story goes, the Legion is still a super-hero team of about twenty (!) members from different planets and that dwells in the 31st century. What’s different is that it’s now at the center of a youth-movement with more than 75,000 affiliate members. Any kid on any planet who endorses the Legion philosophy can consider himself a legionnaire, even though the core team is still just the twenty-or-so we spend most of our time reading about.
The Legion philosophy is radical for its time. For the last thousand years, humanity has lived in a near-utopian environment with scarcely a breeze to ruffle a bird’s feathers. But it’s a world with a dark side whereby parents have their kids hooked into an invisible Internet that monitors everything they see and hear . . . for their safety, of course.
The opening narration to the Legion explains:
Ours is an age of peace and tranquility. By the dawn of the 31st century, an Earth-based network of worlds has created a rigidly mannered serenity throughout the cosmos–a near-utopia. All we, our parents, and their parents have ever known is security, stability, and order.
We’re so sick of it, we could scream.
The Legion is determined not only to fight bad guys, but to bring back to society a sense of fun, adventure, and excitement.
The first two issues are a good start!
While the story is good (an inter-stellar war is about to start), the characters are also good.
These are important for a long-time fan who has known and loved these character (literally, in my case) for decades.
One of the things that happens each time a title reboots is that the creators adjust the characters in ways they hope will create interesting story potential. Sometimes they are successful; sometimes they are not.
For example, last time the Legion rebooted, one of the most easy-to-look-at legionnaires, the gorgeous Princess Projecta, became a giant snake! (Bad move! My philosophy is: If you want to introduce a legionnaire who is a giant snake, fine, just don’t mess with an established character who is easy to look at.)
In the Legion’s latest incarnation, that hasn’t happened (yet), but other changes, good and not-as-good, have occurred.
I don’t mind the character changes if they serve a conceptual purpose. For example, I was tickled pink by what they did with Colossal Boy.
Originally, Colossal Boy was an Earthling who had invented a serum that allowed him to grow to . . . well . . . colossal proporitions. In the new version, he’s a man from a race of giants who has the ability to shrink himself down to being six feet tall and who wants to be called "Micro Lad" (he doesn’t get his wish).
Ha!
That’s great!
Another creative change centers on Dream Girl, who is from a planet where people have visions of the future, often in their dreams. Dream Girl has always been a hard character for writers to handle, but Waid has broadened the character’s conceptual background immeasurably in the new reboot. In the past she’s been kind of ditzy, but now she spends enough time in the future that she forgets things like . . . we haven’t yet defeated the bad guy in front of us.
Especially nice is the way the second issue plays Dream Girl off the ultra-rational Brainiac 5 (a super-genius from the planet Colu). Brainiac 5 resents here because he spends untold amounts of mental effort deducing the likely outcome of events from gigaquads of seemingly-unrelated data, only to have a precognitive like Dream Girl waltz in and come up with the same conclusion by sheer intuition.
At the end of the second issue, we get this exchange between the two of them regarding Dream Girl’s seemingly infallible predictions:
BRAINIAC 5: All it would take is for one future casualty–just one–to find the will to break the lockstep of destiny. If that happens, all probabilities shift.
The universe is more unpredictable than we give it credit for.
Your predictions don’t have to be infallible.
DREAM GIRL: . . . (pauses) . . . (smiles) . . . You’ll feel different when we’re married.
Hah!
Yes!
(Previous Legion continuity has already established that Brainiac 5 has a thing for blonds, and Dream Girl is a blond).
Not all of the character changes are ones I would have made. For example, Star Boy (who has the power to increase an object’s mass) has inexplicably been changed into a black guy for no apparent purpose relating to the story. There are already people in Legion history who could (and should) be introduced to establish adequate black representation on the team: the second Invisible Kid and both of the Kid Quantums, for example. New characters also can be introduced. Unless they have a special story to tell relating to the new Star Boy’s ethnicity, I don’t see the point of the switch.
That being said, I do like the new Star Boy’s character. He looks really cool, and he gets some of the best comedic lines.
In any event, I’d like to recommend the new Legion title for any comic book fans in the audience.
(Saturn Girl had just better not turn into a giant star-nosed mole!)
The monster proceeded, ever so carefully, to crawl out of its carefully-constructed and benighted burrow.
Its many-clawed hands, one claw to a finger, stretched forward and pullled the black dirt back toward its fur-covered body.
As this happened, its many-tendriled snout probed further into the darkness that was soon to become light.
As it did so, it encountered a bit of its standard food-prey and sucked it up in an instant–quicker than the humsn eye could follow!
Fully twenty-two tentacles reached forward from its nose, forming a hideous moustache that could only be possessed by a blind, elder-horror envisioned first by the kind of mind possessed by a demented, soul-shattered, day-gaunt such as the Master of weird horror, H. P. Lovecraft himself!
Even the name of the horrible abnormality itself conveyed the nature of its blasphemous, crawling chaos:
It was the Star-Nosed Mole!
Tremble, worlds of sanity! Tremble! For here is its deadly, maddening visage!
THIS IS NOT A DREAM!!!
THIS IS NOT A HOAX!!!
THIS IS THE TRUE FACE OF ELDER-COSMIC MADNESS STARING YOU IN THE FACE!!!
Down yonder, a reader writes:
My daughter has been learning some Mandarin, and she advised me that
the expression for "yes" in Mandarin is "shi" (it is so) or "hao"
(okay). I checked it out at the following webpage:http://www.elite.net/~runner/jennifers/yes.htm
That page also cites expressions for "yes" in Latin and Irish.
Thanks for the input, but what your daughter told you isn’t strictly correct.
In Mandarin, "shi" is the verb "to be," and it is used to signal agreement, but it isn’t a direct equivalent for "yes."
"Yes" is a particle that is used to signal agreement irrespective of the content of the question it answers. Questions like "Are you an American?" or "Can you speak English?" both get answered in English by "yes."
In languages that don’t have "yes," like Mandarin, agreement is signalled in a different way that generally depends on the content of the question. Typically, yes-less languages will grab the main verb of the question and use it to signal affirmation.
Thus if someone asks you in Mandarin "Ni hui shuo Yingwen ma?" ("Can you speak English?") , you’d grab the main verb "hui" (sounds like "whey", means "can") and use it where you’d use "yes" in English.
Similarly, if someone asks you "Ni shi Meiguo ren ma?" ("Are you an American?"), you’d grab the main verb "shi" (sounds like "sure", means "is/are/be") and use it in place of "yes."
(NOTE: These transliterations are very rough as the English alphabet is not designed to convey the sounds used in Mandarin; for example, "shi" actually sounds more like the English word "sure" clipped short, or just "shr!")
Other yes-less languages tend to do the same thing. That’s why, in translations of the liturgy, questions like "Do you believe in God the Father Almighty?" get answered with "I do" (grabbing the main verb) rather than "yes."
The same is true of Irish.
A while back I was reading a 20th century British apologist (Chesterton?) who noted that Irishmen who speak English tend to do this even in English as it’s the way their culture’s native language handles questions. Ask an Irishman "Are you a Catholic?" and you’re more likely to get the answer "I am" than you would if you asked an English or American Catholic the same question (they’d be more inclined to use "yes"). Upon reading this, I recognized that my friend from Dublin would do this all the time, but I hadn’t noticed it before.
As to the yes-in-550-languages page, pages like that are neat, but you have be careful. The people who put those pages together don’t really speak 550 languages, nor (so far as I can tell) are they linguists who could responsibly handle data from a language they don’t personally speak. As a result, there are errors and oversimplifications on those pages.
Okay, Lent is about to begin again, and that generates questions (and quarrels) every year. We may as well get the annual Lenten controversy underway with a bang.
Here’s a basic fact sheet (with some surprising facts that I’ll probably have to follow up on–trust me, after answering Lent questions every year for the last twelve years, I’ve researched these points quite thoroughly):
More info on Lent here:
And here:
http://jimmyakin.org.master.com/texis/master/search/?q=lent&s=SS
Highlights:
Highlights:
How to avoid the cold & flu . . . and how to treat them once you’ve got them.
Myths vs. facts.
Courtesy of the folks at Kleenex.
Be sure and tell Mr. Monk.
How to avoid the cold & flu . . . and how to treat them once you’ve got them.
Myths vs. facts.
Courtesy of the folks at Kleenex.
Be sure and tell Mr. Monk.
NOTE: In its native form, "Will the Circle Be Unbroken" is one of the three saddest songs ever written together with "Tomorrow Never Comes" (Creedence Clearwater Revival) and "Ashokan Farewell" (Various).
NOTENOTE: By the authority vested in me as blog administrator, I am the arbiter of what counts as the saddest songs ever written. No song is in this category until I hear it and judge it so.
NOW: A good piece back I started getting into the unique sound of the Nitty Gritty Dirt Band.
The Dirt Band’s sound was unique in that it didn’t fit into any of the typical categories of popular music in its day (the late 1960s and 1970s). "What is it?" some promos asked. Was it Rock? Country? Folk? Bluegrass? Or something else?
Truth be told, the Dirt Band’s music is today what we might classify as Country-Rock. This was before Rock n’Roll fell apart in the late 1980s and the ensuing remnants were swept up into contemporary Country (which is surprisingly Rock-like), insipid Pop, noxious Hip-Hop, and offensive Rap.
But not all the Dirt Band’s work is Country-Rock. A notable exception is its 1971 album Will The Circle Be Unbroken.
This album is much more traditional, with melodious melodies courtesy of Country-Folk-Bluegrass artists such as Doc Watkins, Earl Scruggs, and Mother Maybelle Carter.
It was a meeting-of-the-generations album, with the Dirt Band (representing youth) joining established artists (representing the older generation) to create wonderful, traditional music.
In a time when the "generation gap" was the talk of the nation, the cover of the album bore the hopeful legend: "Music forms a new Circle."
Indeed it did.
The title song of of the album was sung by country-legend Mother Maybelle, together with the Dirt Band and all the other artists appearing on the album.
The song tells the story of a person who is forced to surrender one’s mother to the reality of death and who wonders whether the whole of the family circle will or will not be reunited with God in heaven.
The central lyric and the chorus of the song is as follows:
Will the circle be unbroken?
By-and-by, Lord, by-and-by?
There’s a better home a-waitin’,
In the sky, Lord, in the sky!
As the chorus suggests, the song has notes of hope, caution, and loss.
It was fitting that Mother Maybelle take the lead in singing the song since she was a member of the original Carter Family. The Carter Family was centered on A. P. Carter, who originally wrote the song. The Carter Family also included his sister-in-law Mother Maybelle Carter and, eventually, her daughter June Carter.
June Carter married music-legend Johnny Cash, to become June Carter Cash.
Mother Maybelle died in 1978, leaving her daughter (June Carter Cash) and he son-in-law (Johnny Cash) behind her.
In the 1980s, the Dirt Band decided to do a sequel album titled Will The Circle Be Unbroken, Volume 2.
This time around, Johnny Cash was one of the main guest singers on the album, and he took the lead on the album’s rendition of the song "Will The Circle Be Unbroken" (which, once again, was sung with the Dirt Band and all the artists participating on the album).
It was a nice touch.
A. P. Carter had written the song.
His sister-in-law, Mother Maybelle, took the lead in recording it the first time around.
Now Mother Maybelle’s son-in-law, Johnny Cash, took the lead.
But the Dirt Band didn’t leave it untouched. They made one of the three saddest songs ever written sound . . . happier, with more hope than before in it. And they added a new stanza to it:
We sang the songs of childhood,
Hymns of faith that made us strong,
Ones that Mother Maybelle taught us,
Hear the angels sing along!