Confession Validity

A reader writes:

I just went to confession, and then to Mass.  I did not receive communion at
Mass, however, because I am uncertain of the validity of my confession.
Here’s why. 

It was getting close to the time Mass would start, and the
priest seemed to be in a hurry.  First, he interrupted me while I was
confessing, and gave me some spiritual guidance, and seeming to have
forgotten that I was not done confessing, concluded and gave me a penance.  I
questioned him about the fact that I was not done.  He apologized, and I
continued. 

When I was done, he said some concluding remarks, gave me my
penance, but did not absolve me, so I asked if he would, and he told me he
already did, presumably when he had interrupted me, and he ended up saying
something somewhat resembling the proper form, but very hurriedly.  I don’t
think that he said the whole "I absolve you in the name of the Father, and of
the Son, and of the Holy Spirit."  He did, however say, "I absolve you."  I
heard that much clearly, and I left it at that.  I didn’t say an act of
contrition, but I was contrite. 

Was my confession valid?  Can the fact that
I’m seriously doubting the validity of it render it invalid, even if it
otherwise would have been valid?  I’m really confused here.  I just want to
know what to do.

Your doubt of the confession’s validity has no bearing on whether or not it was valid. It either was or it wasn’t. Your doubts now do not affect that.

Neither does the absence of a specific act of contrition since you were already contrite. The purpose of the act of contrition is to elicit contrition if it is not already there. The contrition itself–not a specific statement of it–is what is essential.

That being said, the aboslution was probably valid.

You know that he did say "I absolve you" but (a) he was speaking in a way difficult for you to hear or follow and (b) priests tend not to make up formulas from scratch when they’re speaking hurriedly; they’re on autopilot, and (c) you were rattled by the situation. He probably used the correct formula and you just didn’t hear it all.

Based on what you have told me, you would be able to proceed in good conscience on the premise that you were validly absolved. If you weren’t then your next absolution will take care of the problem since you aren’t deliberately holding anything back but are proceeding according to the best of your knowledge.

While you would be able to proceed in good conscience on the premise that you have been validly absolved, if you want to erase all doubt, just repeat the confession.

Here are some tips for how to avoid this kind of thing in the future:

  • Take note of this priest and if the phenomenon repeats with him in the future, go to someone else (if you can).
  • If you need to make a lengthy confession, don’t do it right before Mass. Either show up way early or make a special appointment.
  • To the extent possible, avoid lengthy confessions. There are three ways of doing this, all of which should be pursued simultaneously:

Sin less often. This, of course, is what you should do. In fact, we are obliged before Christ to cooperate with the Holy Spirit so that, even if we presently have besetting sins, we grow out of them.

Go to confession more frequently. It’s obvious that if you just went recently that you’ll have had less time in which to commit sins and thus are likely to have fewer sins to confess. Further, going to confession frequently is important when you are growing out of a besetting sin. After you’ve committed it, go to confession as quickly as possible to help gain strength to resist the temptation in the future. If you delay going to confession, you may be tempted to commit the sin again on the grounds that your next confession will absolve both instances of the sin.

Confess in a businesslike manner and omit irrelevant detail. People have a tendency to give way more detail and background than is needed.

While (not being a priest) I don’t hear confessions, I am well acquainted with this phenomenon as it happens every time I’m on the radio show. People don’t just ask their questions, they tell stories about how the questions arose and what their tentative answers are and they include way more detail than I need to help them out. That’s human nature. The same thing, I am sure, happens in confession. Penitents give way more background and detail than is needed.

To avoid this, don’t tell stories or try to explain or justify what happened. Just say "I have to confess one incident of this. I have to confess two incidents of that. I have to confess some thoughts of this nature." If applicable, add any exacerbating or mitigating circumstances that apply (e.g., "I knew full well what I was doing and did it anyway," "I was really tired and angry when I did it"). Proceed through your list in a businesslike manner, without pausing in a way that invites the priest to comment (people feel psychological pressure to speak up when there is an awkward pause). Get the list out and trust that he’ll ask any questions he needs. Save any question syou have for him until after you’ve said the list.

Also, while confessing venial sins is a good thing (if not done to the point of scrupulosity), it is not necessary to confess them and thus don’t do it if you’re confessing right before Mass. It puts more time pressure on the priest and is more likely to rattle him as he worries about Mass and the congregation and how many more people may be behind you in line.

Finally, don’t use confessions immediately before Mass for purposes of seeking spiritual direction, The time pressure on the priest may be too great. Make an appointment or grab a priest after Mass.

20

 

Mommy Guilt

Mommy Guilt — guilt for being a mother with a career — is not something I currently experience because I’m not married or a mother (although I do hold out hope).  But since I do one day hope to be a wife, mother, and writer, this post by a romance novelist on a romance novel blog was of some interest to me.

"Sometimes, I even have to shut the door and say, ‘Mommy’s working’ in the . . . EVENINGS. Or, worse, WEEKENDS. Can we say slimy, guilt-ridden mother???

"So here’s the deal. I’m going to try to feel less guilty. Because I still believe it’s really cool to teach my kids that Moms can have wonderfully fulfilling jobs, too. I’ll even let the emotion inform my writing. And I’ll stock up on supplies for the next galaxy I have to help build at midnight."

Is it just me or does it sound to anyone else that this is simply saying, "I know something’s wrong here; I’ve even got my finger to the pulse of what’s not working.  But rather than fix it, I prefer to revel in the guilt"?

Like I said, I’m not a working mom, so I don’t have suggestions for this working mom.  But I don’t think the solution is to use Mommy Guilt to "inform writing."  Kids are kids but a short time.  On your deathbed, are you going to be glad you used your Mommy Guilt to pen a bestseller, or are you going to wish you set aside the copyedits to help build a miniature galaxy with your child? 

I read this post and I started hearing Harry Chapin singing "Cat’s In the Cradle."

*MAD* SCIENTISTS: We Created A Black Hole On Earth!

BlackholeA group of mad scientists have created a black hole on Earth.

In New York!

Well, New York has been a black hole for a long time, so I guess it’s appropriate.

They reportedly smashed streams of gold atom nuclei into each other "at the speed of light" (or, at least, so says the press) to create THE BLACK HOLE OF NEW YORK.

Now, this is a rather doubtful story, but assuming that there is any truth at all to the report, what I want to know is: HOW DARE THEY CREATE SUCH A THING???

I mean: We don’t know enough about such phenomena to allow their creation on Earth willy-nilly!!!

One black hole can ruin your whole reality.

GET THE (SHOCKING) STORY!

(Cowboy hat tip to the reader who sent it!)

Classics Of Internet Humor 1

The next few days are Classics Of Internet Humor time here at JimmyAkin.Org (e-mail me your suggestions for inclusion in the celebration), so let’s get things off on an ecumenical note by flashing back to the Clinton era. Here’s a fictitious news story from back when were here helping out all those Bosnians:

Operation Vowel Drop

CLINTON DEPLOYS VOWELS TO BOSNIA

Cities of Sjlbvdnzv, Grzny to Be First Recipients

Before an emergency joint session of Congress yesterday, President Clinton announced US plans to deploy over 75,000 vowels to the war-torn region of Bosnia. The deployment, the largest of its kind in American history, will provide the region with the critically needed letters A,E,I,O and U, and is hoped to render countless Bosnian names more pronounceable.

"For six years, we have stood by while names like Ygrjvslhv and Tzlynhr and Glrm have been horribly butchered by millions around the world," Clinton said. "Today, the United States must finally stand up and say `Enough.’ It is time the people of Bosnia finally had some vowels in their incomprehensible words. The US is proud to lead the crusade in this noble endeavour."

The deployment, dubbed Operation Vowel Movement by the State Department, is set for early next week, with the Adriatic port cities of Sjlbvdnzv and Grzny slated to be the first recipients. Two C-130 transport planes, each carrying over 500 24-count boxes of "E’s," will fly from Andrews Air Force Base across the Atlantic and airdrop the letters over the cities.

Citizens of Grzny and Sjlbvdnzv eagerly await the arrival of the vowels.

"My God, I do not think we can last another day," Trszg Grzdnjkln, 44, said. "I have six children and none of them has a name that is understandable to me or to anyone else. Mr. Clinton, please send my poor, wretched family just one `E.’ Please."

Said Sjlbvdnzv resident Grg Hmphrs, 67: "With just a few key letters, I could be George Humphries. This is my dream."

The airdrop represents the largest deployment of any letter to a foreign country since 1984. During the summer of that year, the US shipped 92,000 consonants to Ethiopia, providing cities like Ouaouoaua, Eaoiiuae, and Aao with vital, life-giving supplies of L’s, S’s and T’s.

Emergency Fasting For Terri

TerriEd Peters asks:

Can we consider emergency fasting for Terri Schiavo?
   
     Options:

  1. a "Bread and Water" fast until Terri is fed again; or
  2. a "Good Friday" fast (one meal per day, two smaller ones if necessary, and no meat) until Terri is fed again; or
  3. no snacking or eating out till Terri is fed again; or
  4. some physical sacrifice for Terri, her husband and his lawyer, all those defending Terri, and all those attacking her.

Any of these still allow us far more food and water than Terri is getting, but if you have any questions about your own ability to fast, check with a qualified advisor, and follow his or her advice. Never eliminate fluids, especially water, even for what might seem short periods of time. May God bless Terri, and may God bless our country.
   

     "The New Law practices the acts of religion: almsgiving, prayer, and fasting, directing them to the Father who sees in secret…" Catechism of the Catholic Church, no. 1969. Lent is an especially appropriate time to offer up fasts. CCC nos. 1434, 1438.

RELATED: A canonical implication of the Terri Shiavo case.

Terri

Terry_and_mom

Okay. Lunchblogging on a desperate day for Terri Shiavo.

In case you haven’t been keeping up with developments:

  1. The U.S. Congress reportedly issued a subpoena that was served on Terri, requiring her to come to Washington to testify to Congress and making it a federal crime to harm her until this could be done.
  2. A judge (not Darth Greer) ordered that Terri’s food tube not be removed.
  3. Darth Greer overturned this order and re-ordered Terri’s starvation.
  4. Terri reportedly tried to say "I want to live" in front of multiple witnesses.
  5. UPDATE: Terri’s food tube has been removed. The MURDER has begun.

MORE:

On Friday afternoon, less than a hour after probate court judge George W. Greer ignored federal subpoenas and ordered that Michael Schiavo remove the feeding tube from Terri which will cause her death by starvation, Terri Schiavo before multiple witnesses indicated that she wanted to live.

According to attorney Barbara Weller, one of the attorneys representing Terri’s parents, Mary and Bob Schindler Sr., when her parents and attorneys visited Terri at the Woodside Hospice where she resides to tell her they were going to remove her feeding tube, Terri began to cry and tried to say “I want to live”

Attorney Weller said she had a difficult time calming Terri down.

GET THE STORY.

Meanwhile, Peggy Noonan warns:

Here’s both a political and a public-relations reality: The Republican Party controls the Senate, the House and the White House. The Republicans are in charge. They have the power. If they can’t save this woman’s life, they will face a reckoning from a sizable portion of their own base. And they will of course deserve it.

This should concentrate their minds.

So should this: America is watching. As the deadline for removal of Mrs. Schiavo’s feeding tube approaches, the story has broken through as never before in the media.

READ THE REST.

GET THE LATEST.

Spam, Wonderful Spam!

I’m sure the cast of the old Monty Python show could appreciate the absurdity of turning their old gags into a Broadway extravaganza. Why not? I first caught wind of the musical Spamalot on NPR. I was driving home and caught part of an interview with some British actor who is also known for animation voice work. OK, mildly interesting… and then I suddenly heard the voice of Nigel Thornberry issuing from my dilapidated car speakers and thought "Oh, it’s Tim Curry!". He was on the program Fresh Air plugging his latest project: A musical stage adaptation of the best bits of Monty Python.

The play is based on a book by Eric Idle and stars Curry, David Hyde Pierce and Hank Azaria. I have read no reviews, as yet, but the cast is certainly top-drawer. I fear that I would miss the original guys, though.

Find out more at www.montypythonsspamalot.com

Now, if only I can get someone to read this screenplay I worked out for a major motion picture based on Flay Otters, Warty Towels, (oops!sorry…)- Fawlty Towers.

When The Chosen People Go Marching In

So, you say the plain-and-simple meaning of the Bible just ain’t plain and simple for you?  You hear of Stephen being stoned and wonder what he was tripping on?  (No kidding, apparently some people wonder just that.)  Fear not, for behold there is a new Bible translation available just for you:

"For readers of the Bible confused by its archaic language, such as its use of the term ‘stoned’ for a form of execution rather than the effects of smoking dope, help is at hand.

One of the world’s most widely read Bibles, the New International Version, has been modernised by a team of 15 American and British scholars and is published today [March 15].


"Gone is the word ‘aliens,’ which the academics thought was invariably associated in the minds of the younger generation with extra-terrestrials. It is replaced with ‘foreigners.’


"Even the term ‘saints’ is deemed to be too ‘ecclesiastical’ and has been banished, to be replaced with ‘God’s chosen people.’ The Virgin Mary is no longer ‘with child’; she is ‘pregnant.’

Uh, how can the Virgin Mary be pregnant if she is not with child?  I guess that will be a question for the translators of the next edition of this Bible.

GET THE STORY.