Update

2007firesday3As expected, it’s worse today.

One of the big problems is the Santa Ana winds that are blowing and spreading the fires.

The winds were expected to let up last night, but they didn’t as much as expected.

It’s hoped that they will let up later today.

When I woke up this morning I saw there was an evacuation zone near Catholic Answers. I’m not sure what that is at this point, as the map is not showing fire in that area, and they haven’t mentioned it on TV.

BTW, I did a brief phone interview with Vatican Radio about the fires yesterday. MP3 here.

Keep SoCal in Your Prayers

2007firesday2The 2003 fires in the San Diego area left much of the county looking like Mordor.

Now, they’re saying that this year’s fires may be even worse by the time they’re done.

To the left is a map of the fire borders as of today (click to enlarge). The red zones are where the fire boundaries are. The purple areas are evacuation zones. The green dot is the approximate location of Catholic Answers.

Some staffers at Catholic Answers have either been evacuated from their homes or are unable to get to work due to road closures (or warnings that they may need to evacuate).

At Catholic Answers the sky is largely gray from smoke, and there is a burnt smell everywhere outside. Parked cars are covered with little bits of ash.

San Diego also needs to up the server capacity of a lot of their emergency web sites that serve up maps like this. Lots of them are slow as snailes or simply time out.

USEFUL SITES:

UNION-TRIBUNE FIRE BLOG.

WWW.SDCOUNTYEMERGENCY.COM

SANDIEGO.GOV FIRE ALERT

HOME-MADE ANNOTATED GOOGLE MAP

GEOLOGY PAGE AT SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY.

Pro-Life Foot-In-Mouth Disease?

Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has once again given pro-lifers reasons to doubt his commitment to his (relatively) recently-adopted pro-life stance.

In an interview Tuesday he stated that, although he is personally pro-life, he favors letting the states have the right to decide whether to allow abortion, rather than having protection for the unborn established at a federal level.

His campaign workers soon stated that he meant this only as an interim situation and that, consistent with previous statements he has made, he does wish federal protection for the unborn–he just doesn’t feel that it’s possible soon and so, as an interim measure, he would like to see Roe v. Wade repealed so that states could at least begin to prohibit abortion. Then, when the opinion of the nation has shifted further in the pro-life direction, federal protection for the unborn should be sought.

This is a perfectly sensible position. The logical path for the American pro-life movement is to get rid of Roe v. Wade first, then have a period in which states decide and a national pro-life ethic evolves, followed by federal protection for the unborn.

The problem is that Romney didn’t articulate that position in his Tuesday interview. He made it sound like he supported state decisions on this question absolutely.

So was this just a case of pro-life foot-in-mouth disease or was it a case of an individual whose commitment to the pro-life cause is actually shaky and incoherent from one interview to the next?

Either is possible.

You decide.

GET THE STORY.

Some Justice

There’s an episode of I, Claudius titled "Some Justice," in which a trial is held in the Senate to bring to justice those responsible for the death of Claudius’s brother, Germanicus.

The machinations of Roman politics being what they are . . . er, were . . . in the end only "some justice" is done.

That episode came to mind as I read

THIS STORY.

One EXCERPT:

Mr. Freedman said Mr. Nifong, 56, a prosecutor for nearly 29 years, would have never risked his law license and career on hiding DNA evidence that he knew the defense would find.

F. Lane Williamson, chairman of the ethics panel, responded that “there is no rational explanation sometimes” for unethical or illegal behavior. “I don’t know if we’ll ever know,” he said.

Actually, Thomas Sowell doesn’t think that Nifong’s actions were at all inexplicable. He thinks there is a perfectly clear and logical, if evil, reason for them.

PART ONE.

PART TWO.

But This Looks Frightening

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) – Six Muslim men removed from a plane last fall after being accused of suspicious behavior are suing not only the airline but the passengers who complained—a move some fear could discourage travelers from speaking up when they see something unusual.
Link:
Passengers Sued Over Imams’ Removal

EXCERPTS:

A newly released inspector general report backs eyewitness accounts of suspicious behavior by 13 Middle Eastern men on a Northwest Airlines flight in 2004 and reveals several missteps by government officials, including failure to file an incident report until a month after the matter became public.

An air marshal who told The Times that he has been involved personally in terror probes that were ignored by federal security managers, called such behavior typical.

"Agency management was not only covering up numerous probes and dry-run encounters from Congress and other federal law-enforcement agencies, it was also hiding these incidents from their own flying air marshals," said P. Jeffrey Black, an air marshal stationed in Las Vegas.

"Prior to boarding, one of the air marshals noticed what he later characterized as ‘unusual behavior’ by about six Middle Eastern males, who arrived at the gate together, then separated, and acted as if they did not know each other," the report said.

According to the report, Flight 327 was "delayed for five minutes because one of the 13 suspicious passengers, who appeared not to understand English and walked with a limp, was seated in the emergency exit row. The flight attendant determined he was unable to operate the emergency procedures and delayed the flight while having him exchange seats."

"On the flight, 13 Middle Eastern men behaved in a suspicious manner that aroused the attention and concern of the flight attendants, passengers, air marshals and pilots," the report said. The men "walked in the aisle, appearing to count passengers," and "several men spent excessive time in the lavatories."

"One man rushed to the front of the plane appearing to head for the cockpit. At the last moment, he veered into the first-class lavatory, remaining in it for about 20 minutes," according to the report. One man carried a McDonald’s bag into the lavatory, and "another man, upon returning from the lavatory, reeked strongly of what smelled like toilet bowl chemicals."

"Some men hand signaled each other. The passenger who entered the lavatory with the McDonald’s bag made a thumbs-up signal to another man upon returning from the lavatory. Another man made a slashing motion across his throat, appearing to say ‘No.’ "

As the flight descended into Los Angeles, the report said, "four of the suspicious individuals stood up and made their way to the back of the plane," where "the individuals used the rear lavatory, and one of the men was doing stretching exercises/knee bends by the exit door."

A background check conducted weeks later in the FBI’s Automated Case Support (ACS) system revealed that the promoter was involved in a similar probe on Jan. 28, 2004.

The unnamed promoter "was one of eight passengers acting suspiciously aboard Frontier Airlines Flight 577 from Houston through Denver, to San Francisco," the report said.

"Flight attendants reported all eight passengers kept trying to switch seats while boarding and during the flight, made repeated service requests in what the attendants described as an effort to keep the flight crew occupied. One took a cell phone into the front lavatory, remained in the lavatory for over 15 minutes, but did not appear to have the phone when leaving the lavatory," the report said.

The incident followed a series of breaches of airline security in December and January, when the FBI issued a memo warning that suicide terrorists were plotting to hijack trans-Atlantic planes by smuggling "ready-to-build" bomb kits past airport security to be assembled in aircraft bathrooms.

GET THE STORY.

Francis Beckwith Interview

Thomas More advocated religious freedom in “Utopia” to promote civic peace in Christendom and to help unify his fractious Catholic Church. In doing so, he set forth a plan for managing church-state relations that is a precursor to liberal approaches in this area.
Link:
Religious freedom in Thomas More’s UtopiaSanford Kessler. The Review of Politics. Notre Dame: Spring 2002.
Of course, what did St. Thomas More know?
He’s probably a heretic too!
After all, he was obedient to a corrupt Pope and bowed to Papal Authority!

HERE’S A NICE INTERVIEW WITH FRANK BECKWITH AT THE NATIONAL CATHOLIC REGISTER.

AND AN ACCOMPANYING EDITORIAL.

Some excerpts I particularly like:

For someone like me, who was interested in both the spiritual and intellectual grounding of the Christian faith, I didn’t need the “folk Mass” with cute nuns and hip priests playing “Kumbaya” with guitars, tambourines and harmonicas. And it was all badly done.

After all, we listened to the Byrds, Neil Young and Bob Dylan, and we knew the Church just couldn’t compete with them.

But that’s what the Church offered to the young people of my day: lousy pop music and a gutted Mass. If they were trying to make Catholicism unattractive to young and inquisitive Catholics, they were succeeding.

What I needed, and what many of us desired, were intelligent and winsome ambassadors for Christ who knew the intellectual basis for the Catholic faith, respected and understood the solemnity and theological truths behind the liturgy, and could explain the renewal movements in light of these.

* * *

You spent 32 years in the evangelical world. What could Catholics learn from evangelicals?

In terms of expository preaching, as well as teaching the laity, Protestant evangelicals are without peers in the Christian world.

For instance, it is not unusual for evangelical churches to host major conferences on theological issues in which leading scholars address lay audiences in order to equip them to share their faith with their neighbors, friends, etc. Works by evangelical philosophers and theologians such as [J.P.] Moreland, [Paul] Copan, and William Lane Craig, should be in the library of any serious Catholic who wants to be equipped to respond to contemporary challenges to the Christian faith.

* * *

Then I read the Council of Trent, which some Protestant friends had suggested I do. What I found was shocking. I found a document that had been nearly universally misrepresented by many Protestants, including some friends.

I do not believe, however, that the misrepresentation is the result of purposeful deception. But rather, it is the result of reading Trent with Protestant assumptions and without a charitable disposition.

For example, Trent talks about the four causes of justification, which correspond somewhat to Aristotle’s four causes. None of these causes is the work of the individual Christian. For, according to Trent, God’s grace does all the work. However, Trent does condemn “faith alone,” but what it means is mere intellectual assent without allowing God’s grace to be manifested in one’s actions and communion with the Church. This is why Trent also condemns justification by works.

I am convinced that the typical “Council of Trent” rant found on anti-Catholic websites is the Protestant equivalent of the secular urban legend that everyone prior to Columbus believed in a flat earth.

READ THE WHOLE THING

Pipes on Fascism Old and New

Yes, I know Daniel Pipes is a reliable apologist for Israeli policy, and likely biased in his assessments, but I have been surprised myself at the extent of the connections – not just ideological, but historical, political and structural – between the Islamofascists (for want of a better term) of the last half-century and Hitler’s Third Reich.

Guys like Yasser Arafat and Saddam Hussein could trace their political lineage directly to card-carrying Nazis. Fellas like Grand Mufti Mohammad Amin al-Husayni were their heroes and mentors.

Makes you wonder if Arab countries labeling Israel as the aggressor in the Middle East isn’t more brazenly twisted than O.J. Simpson and his search for the "real killers".

PIPES’ LATEST on CATHOLIC EXCHANGE.

The X Party Vs. The Y Party

It’s not uncommon to hear people refer to the Democratic Party as the "Mommy" party and the Republican Party as the "Daddy" party, but Michael Medved has a different way of characterizing the two.

In this column, he contrasts the "Senator" party with the "Governor" party, assigning the former role to the Democrats and the latter to the Republicans.

He bases this on a look at both where their recent presidential nominees have come from (legislative or executive backgrounds) and where their current crops of presidential hopefuls come from.

He also suggest that the tendency of Democrats to nominate senators for president and Republicans to nominate governors has to do with their (or at least their parties’ nominating core’s) view of government and the proper role of the presidency.

It’s an interesting hypothesis.

It’s also interesting to contemplate how it matches up with conventional political wisdom that it’s easier to get elected president if you’re a governor than if you’re a senator. One theory proposed to explain this is that governors have less of a paper trail than long-time senators do, meaning it’s harder to paint them as politically undesirable based on their past voting record.

But that’s just one theory, and there are several other possible ones here.

Whether any of them will help either party in ’08 (should either nominate a governor for president) is a whole different matter.