Decent Films doings, 8/2009

SDG here with a few Decent Films notes.

Remember the LifeSiteNews Harry Potter / Pre-16 brouhaha? Jimmy has written about it more than once (as has Eastern Orthodox Harry Potter maven John Granger).

Well, the story’s still out there, and recently I got an email asking me about the Ratzinger letters as well as Fr. Amorth’s anti-HP comments, so I’ve offered my own take in a piece facetiously called “Harry Potter vs. the Pope?” (a play on the title of my eight-year-old essay “Harry Potter vs. Gandalf“).

The new essay is a spin-off of my Decent Films Mail column, for which I just posted two new batches, DF Mail #14 and DF Mail #15. In these batches: Watchmen and caveats of an (apparent) atheist-anarchist who objects to associating either label with nihilism; lots and lots on Up and Harry Potter; The Wizard of Oz and Theosophism; and more. If you haven’t read my DF Mail column, you might enjoy perusing the last few installments as well.

Also, of course, my review of the latest Harry Potter film has been up for awhile now.

Other new reviews posted since my last Decent Films update include G-Force, Public Enemies and Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs.


Sadly, Disney’s G-Force has nothing to do with this.

P.S. Sadly, G-Force has nothing to do with the much more awesome “Battle of the Planets.” In fact, the more I think about it, the more I suspect that the whole inspiration for G-Force (other than a corporate mandate to sell talking plush toys to children) began with a single family-film-ified pop-culture reference joke (“Yippie kay yay, coffee-maker”), and then the whole plot was constructed around that single line. What else could possibly be the explanation for a plot about robotic household appliances planning to take over the world (or whatever)?

Political humor

This cartoon reminds me of something from the Team America movie that someone told me about (I didn’t see it myself), a satiric pro-American song that I can’t even repeat the title of here. (The cartoon below also has an objectionable word in it.)

Or, at least, that’s how many Americans would view the rest of the world, if they had even that much geographical awareness.

In reality, I think many Americans see the world through the same sort of lens (though not of course from the same perspective) as Saul Steinberg’s famous New Yorker cover map of the world cartoon:

Oh, and JibJab is at it again!

Try JibJab Sendables® eCards today!

Decent Films doings, 6/2009

Latest reviews, both about thoughtful films for adults in limited release:

Moon, a science fiction throwback to the philosophical sci-fi of the late 1960s and early 1970s (2001: A Space Odyssey and its ilk), starring Sam Rockwell and directed by first-time filmmaker Duncan Jones. (Yes, he’s the son of David Bowie.)

Summer Hours, French director Olivier Assayas’s extraordinary family-drama meditation on legacy and loss, the meaning of art and the relentless march of time, and the fragmentation of families and erosion of culture in an age of globalization.

Although both films are philosophically freighted, both engage the world of ideas in a way organic to the spare, small-scale stories they have to tell — stories about the personal dilemmas of a small number of characters (in the case of Moon, a very small number). Both well worth tracking down.

Up to Heaven

SDG here with a heart-rending yet uplifting real-life story about life imitating art in a beautiful act of kindness from Pixar, makers of Up.

HUNTINGTON BEACH – Colby Curtin, a 10-year-old with a rare form of cancer, was staying alive for one thing – a movie.

From the minute Colby saw the previews to the Disney-Pixar movie Up, she was desperate to see it. Colby had been diagnosed with vascular cancer about three years ago, said her mother, Lisa Curtin, and at the beginning of this month it became apparent that she would die soon and was too ill to be moved to a theater to see the film.

After a family friend made frantic calls to Pixar to help grant Colby her dying wish, Pixar came to the rescue.

The company flew an employee with a DVD of Up, which is only in theaters, to the Curtins’ Huntington Beach home on June 10 for a private viewing of the movie.

Colby died only seven hours after experiencing Up.

Up‘s story of bereavement and hoped-for adventures that would never be must have had shattering poignancy to that dying girl and her family. The story reports that Colby’s mother later said she had no idea how close the film would hit to home: “I just know that word ‘Up’ and all of the balloons and I swear to you, for me it meant that (Colby) was going to go up. Up to heaven.” (Colby’s funeral was held at Our Lady of Mt. Carmel Catholic Church.)

The overlap of the film’s themes and Colby’s circumstances was especially brought home by one of the bits of Up memorabilia the Pixar employee brought to the family: an “Adventure Book” much like the one Ellie leaves Carl with, with its blank pages. “I’ll have to fill those adventures in for her,” Colby’s mom said. (Another point of contact: Colby’s parents are divorced, like Russell’s parents. But where Russell’s dad seems to have dropped out of his son’s life, Colby’s dad came to the house after the screening and was with his daughter when she died.)

A family friend reported that the Pixar employee “couldn’t have been nicer … His eyes were just welled up.”

A heartbreaking detail: A few days earlier, Colby’s mother had asked a hospice company to bring a wheelchair so that Colby could see the film in the theater. But the wheelchair never arrived, and Colby quickly became too sick to get out to a theater, necessitating Pixar’s supererogatory intervention. (By the time the movie came to Colby, she was in too much pain to open her eyes and look at it, so her mother gave her scene-by-scene commentary. She did, however, respond to a query about whether she enjoyed the film by nodding her head yes.)

By the way: “Pixar officials declined to comment on the story or name the employees involved.” Beyond class. That’s all I can say.

READ THE (HEART-RENDING, UPLIFTING) STORY.

NJ / Northeast Catholic Conventions: Homeschooling, Catholic Writers

Live within driving distance of New Jersey? A heads-up on two Catholic conventions in the NJ area, one of which I’ll be speaking at (I may stop in at the other too, though I’m not a speaker).

The first is the Sacred HEART Homeschooling Convention. It takes place on Saturday, June 20, a mere ten days from now, at my own home parish of St. John the Evangelist in Orange, NJ.

I’ll be speaking on homeschooling (and parenting generally) in a new media age. My friend and fellow parishioner Damon Owens, well known for his work with NFP, theology of the body and chastity on EWTN and other venues, will be speaking on marriage and the family in the Catholic faith, society and Catholic pedagogy.

We’ll be joined by Mary Daly of Ye Hedge School (the good Mary Daly, not the now-retired Boston College nutjob), Martha Nowik of Pierre Toussaint Homeschool and Dylan McDonald of the Family Cloister Learning Center.

Even if you don’t homeschool, it’ll be a great conference. There’ll be tons of vendors with lots of goodies and other stuff. Plus, you’ll get to see one of the most beautiful churches around.

And hey, today is the last day to get the early-bird registration rate. So, register now!

There’s also the Catholic Writers Conference on August 5-7 in Somerset, NJ.

There are a lot of featured speakers — Mark Brumley of Ignatius Press, Claudia Volkman and Tom Hoopes of Circle Media (which publishes my paper, the National Catholic Register), Regina Doman of Sophia Press, Sister Maria Grace of Pauline Books and Media, Lisa Wheeler of the Maximus Group and Matthew Pinto of Ascension Press publisher, among others.

So, if you’re a Catholic writer — or want to be one — register now!

Great Day For Up!

UP! UP! UP!

Great day for UP!

Wake every person, pig and pup, till EVERYONE

on the EARTH is up!

That's from Dr. Seuss's Great Day for Up, but it also encapsulates my enthusiasm for Pixar's latest film (which has a bit of Dr. Seuss influence, or at least bits reminiscent of Dr. Seuss).

I don't just mean my enthusiasm for Up. I mean my enthusiasm for their latest film — whatever it is. In any given year, Pixar weekend is one of the most reliably exciting times to be a critic.

There may be better films in any given year, but no filmmaker, no franchise, no creative team, no factor I can think of more reliably translates to very high quality than the Pixar logo. No other film event more consistently stands among the year's top highlights than Pixar weekend.

Last year it was WALL-E; the year before, Ratatouille. Before that, Cars, a rare middling effort from Pixar that still stands solidly with the best of their competitors' work.

In 2005, alas, there was nothing at all — no Pixar weekend all year long. They also missed 2002 (and prior to that they averaged only a film every two years). But in between 2002 and 2005 they produced the dazzling Finding Nemo and the even greater The Incredibles, probably one of my top 25 films of all time. So you gotta cut them some slack.

Next year, Pixar weekend will bring us Toy Story 3. The following year, for the first time ever, we're slated for two Pixar weekends: Cars 2 and The Bear and the Bow, the latter being the first Pixar film with a female protagonist. (Cars 2? Who was clamoring for a sequel to Cars? When oh when will Brad Bird revisit The Incredibles?)

Being a film critic isn't all free movies and, well, free movies. You try giving up your cozy evenings at home to schlep to the city and sit through the likes of Angels & Demons and Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian month after month.

And that's not all. Then you have to write about them! Which means you have to think about them! Sometimes, if you're not careful, you wind up thinking about them a lot more than the filmmakers did. And then reviews like this (or, even worse, discussions like this) are the unfortunate result.

Pixar, though, makes it all worth it.

How do they do it? How do they keep doing it? Magic? I have no idea. I just want them to never stop.

My review of Up

Decent Films doings: Angels & Demons

SDG here with two new Angels & Demons pieces: my review of the film, and an essay on the relationship of religion and science in the story. (A third piece, fact-checking Angels & Demons, went up last week.)

And that's it. I'm done. I'm Browned out. I'm grateful for the trip to Geneva and Rome, but after five different pieces for four different publications, reedited into three pieces (so far) for Decent Films, plus various radio appearances and a spot on EWTN, now that I've actually survived to opening day, I never want to hear, say, read or write the name "Robert Langdon" ever again. Ever.

Especially since Brown's upcoming third Langdon thriller, The Lost Symbol, is all about Freemasons and is apparently set in Washington, DC.

I've been to Washington, DC.

Heck, my family and I toured the West Wing, had lunch in the West Wing mess hall, and climbed up the elevator shaft at the Smithsonian Air and Space Museum. 

Of course, I bet Langdon will wind up jumping out of Air Force One with nothing but a propeller beanie and splashdown in the Reflecting Pool. And then find the hidden code in invisible ink on the back of the Declaration of Independence … that … Nicolas Cage already found in National Treasure. Hm.

(Oh, dang. Catholic Answers Live at the end of the month. I'm not done yet. Once more into the breach…)

Decent Films doings: Digging Star Trek, Fact-checking Angels & Demons

SDG here with two new Decent Films pieces for the second week in a row (woo hoo!).

One is about why Star Trek is worth getting excited over. Whether you’re a Trekkie or a skeptie, the new film will probably offer you something to cheer about.

The other is an essay fact-checking Angels & Demons (both the book and the movie). Turns out a bunch of stuff Dan Brown says is really truly true actually isn’t. Who knew?

P.S. Comments, suggestions, corrections and expansions to the fact-check article are welcome. (Masked Chicken and any serious science types: I would particularly welcome your insights to my comments on the story’s science. [Dan Brown’s story, I mean.])

P.P.S. Next week I’ll have my film review of Angels & Demons, as well as another piece focusing on anti-Catholicism in the book and the film.