Interregnum Questions

A reader writes:

Don’t take this the wrong way, I am very sad at the passing of John Paul II. He was a great, great man and leader.

I was just wondering how we are to refer to the prayers for the Pope in the liturgy and for indulgences. Will the church still include, "for our pope John Paul, our bishop N", or will it be generic? Also, when obtaining a plenary indulgence, you must pray for the Holy Father’s intentions. Since JPII is most likely in heaven, do we pray for his intentions? Since he probably is one of the church’s biggest advocates (along with all the former Popes) in heaven.

Just wondering. I have never gone through this before (at least at the age of reason), and was wondering since we will be without a Pope for a couple weeks. Let’s all pray for his successor. He will have HUGE shoes to fill, but I imagine the Holy Spirit will help him out there…

Indeed.

Regarding the two questions you ask, the Sacramentary does not provide a specific option for what to do in an interregnum (period between the reign of two popes). There may be an obscure directive on the books somewhere, but I suspect most priests don’t know it. As a result, I imagine that most priests will either omit the prayer for the pope in Masses in the interregnum or decide on their own backward- or forward-pointing modification.

As far as indulgences, it is not clear to me that plenary indulgences (except the indulgence for the dying) are available in the interregnum since the gaining of one requires prayer for the pope’s intentions. With "the pope" being a null set at the moment, it seems that the matter is ambiguous. It might be that this requirement is in abeyance until there is a new pope, that praying of the the intentions of the former or the coming pope might suffice, or that it is simply not possible to fulfill this condition until the new pontificate. I don’t know of any settled answer on this matter.

Wish I could be of more help.

Media Appearnces

UPDATE: Ed Peters is supposed to be on Fox & Friends at 7:45 a.m. Eastern Sunday.

I’m s’pposed to be on Fox News (by phone) at 3:00 a.m. Eastern Sunday, which will be warped in some time zones by the Spring Forward effect physicists have been saying os much about in recent years.

For those in California, I’m was on the local 24-hour CBS news radio station at 3:10 p.m. local time Saturday. I’m also told they’ll be re-running this interview periodically, but I don’t have info on when or how often.

LINK: http://www.knx1070.com/

Action News!

Years ago when I was doing game design work, I had an idea for a game that I never ran but which I think could have been a lot of fun. The idea was this: A game in which the characters play gung-ho, gonzo TV journalists in a "go anywhere, do anything, get the news at any cost" near-future, semi-post-apocalyptic competitive environment modelled after Edison Carter’s "What I Want To Know" show on Max Headroom.

The title for the game would have been Action News!

One of the gimmics of the news trade in this game would be that the networks would fake the impression that they have studios all over the place by just taking their cameras from town to town, printing up a computerized background with the name of the local city, and pretending that they were "Here at our Podunk Bureau . . . "

In actuality, something like this exists in real life, and I got to sit in such a virtual bureau last night.

When I got a call to appear on Fox News, I assumed that I’d be driving down to the local Fox affiliate, where I’ve appeared before, and that the local station would do the uplink to the network.

Not so.

Instead, the network sent a limo for me (which made it like the second time in my life I’ve ever ridden in a limo), which was a good thing as finding the right place to go at 1 a.m. would not have been a fun thing for me. The right place to go also was not the local Fox affiliate. It was a virtual bureau.

These things exist in every city of significant size. They’re how networks get in-studio interviews with folks in cities that aren’t their major news hubs. I’d known about them, but I’d never been in one before.

The limo guy drove me downtown while I quizzed him about his work. (He was a real nice guy.) When we found the address, we first went past it because it looked like an abandoned walk-down storefront business.

In reality, it was a hole-in-the-wall virtual studio crammed with technical doodads. It had an entry way with a card table with a wrench and socket set sitting on it. A hallway filled with posters that the famous people who’d come there had signed. A bathroom with a folding chair and big mirror for getting hair and make-up right. A dark studio room with an incredibly short office chair, camera, lights, and various backgrounds that could be put behind the guest (including a massive TV for animated backgrounds). And it had an "other" room for the guest and cameraman to wait in where there were lots of rumpled newspapers and electronics and computer equipment.

There was just one cameraman. He was the only guy there. He wasn’t even the usual cameraman since it was the usual cameraman’s birthday. But he was a real nice guy and he got us hooked up to Fox in New York just fine.

The virtual studio, y’see, doesn’t just serve one network. They’s the local San Diego contact point for any national cable show that needs a live remote guest hookup. The cameraman told me they’d done Larry King there, they did a bunch for Fox News there, and the other folks. In fact, I realized, I was sitting in the same chair Sean Hannity had been sitting in a week or so ago, when I’d seen him sitting against the same pull-down San Diego night time skyline background I was now sitting in front of.

At least on Fox (I don’t know about other networks) the attitude toward the pope’s passing has, overall, been respectful and wanting to celebrate the holy father and many of the things he’s done, even though they do want to ask those "probing" politically-oriented questions.

They got me wired up with a mic and an earpiece and I listened as various folks in New York talked to me, asked me questions (usually whether I could hear them), and handed me electronically from one department to another while we waited for the segment I was to be on to roll around.

It did. I got asked several questions by the host, who also talked to Tim Gray by phone. (You mean I could have stayed home and phoned this in instead of coming down after midnight???) I got asked one question I particularly wanted to be asked (the gist of which was "Is the pope a hidebound conservative?", letting me have the opportunity to contrast what is essential from non-essential in the faith and characterizing John Paul II’s approach as "faithful openness").

And then it was all over.

The cameraman unhooked me, signed off to New York, I called the limo driver to come pick me up, and a few minutes later I was on my way home.

The limo guy was particularly jazzed by the whole experience. He’d gone back to headquarters while I was waiting to go on the air and he caught my segment on TV. He thought I came across as very calm and in control of what I wanted to say. He had known I was going to be on TV, but something about seeing it make it click for him, and I was tickled at how excited he was afterward. Said getting to meet a "celebrity" had made his night.

I just chuckled at that and rolled my eyes in the dark.

But the experience brought back memories of Action News!

Sin City

A reader writes:

Dear Jimmy,

This has been a rough day in a rough week and the news from the Vatican has me totally bummed out. What to do? I had a spare moment and thought that a little distraction would help. I like Bruce Willis. I like Tarantino. I decided to see Sin City.

This movie is one of the worst things to see with the eyes. It is very anti-establishment and has some real over-the-top anti-Catholic moments in it as well. It sickens me that in this time of crisis, I cannot go to a simple movie without being blasted by the hatred of some adolescent mind.

Anywho, my advice: do not see this fifty-pound monkey that sits on your head relentlessly banging it … I mean, movie.

Sin Cerely,
Namewithheld

A thought: I don’t know what movies are playing right now, but one can still see movies that aren’t Evil. May I suggest The Incredibles (just out on DVD)? It’s InconceivableIncredible!

Thanks for the warning about fifty-pound monkeysmovies!

Papal Update Links

A reader writes:

Would you please advise us to any reputable links to keep us updated on the Pope’s condition?

I’m afraid that I don’t know of anything that will give up-to-the-moment updates from a reliable Catholic perspective, so let me make several recommendations that may serve together:

CATHOLIC WORLD NEWS

A GOOGLE NEWS SEARCH CONFIGURED FOR THE MOST RECENT STORIES FEATURING THE WORDS "POPE" AND "DIED."

And your humble blog.

Incidentally, here’s TODAY’S SHOW ON CATHOLIC ANSWERS LIVE, which was devoted to the topic (LISTENDOWNLOAD).

Also, it looks as if I may be appearing on Fox News between 4:30 and 5:30 5-6 a.m. Eastern for the few who might be up then or want to tape it.

Likely the first of a number of media appearances for Catholic Answers folks in coming days, though we’ll have to see.

The Passing of John Paul II

Here at Catholic Answers we’re getting reports that the pope has indeed passed.

Still trying to verify this from other sources.

If you have any, please leave them in the combox.

Either way, let’s pray for his soul and for the Church.

UPDATE: More Info Here.

BACKGROUND INFO ON WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A POPE DIES.

MORE.

2ND UPDATE: INFO ON THE SEPTIC SHOCK THE POPE HAS SUFFERED.

The Clone Wars

Clonewars_1We’ve been hearing about the Clone Wars ever since Alec Guinness first mentioned them in the original Star Wars movie back in 1977.

But we’ve never seen them.

Even now we probably won’t really get to see them on the big screen. The first clone war begins at the end of Episode II and the last is reported to end in Episode III, probably (this is speculation on my part, so don’t spoil it, anybody who has specific knowledge) early so that the story can focus on the fall of Annakin Skywalker.

But we have the unique chance to see the Clone Wars on the small screen, either TV or computer. Lucas contracted to have a clone war cartoon series made by cartoon action-master Genndy Tartakovsky (known for such action-oriented toons as The Powerpuff Girls and the visually-stunning Samuari Jack) for Cartoon Network.

The results turned out well enough that Lucas asked Tartakovsky to go back to the drawing board and do a sequel clone war cartoon series that would lead directly in to Episode III. In fact, the final shot of the last animated clone war toon is supposed to be the same as the opening shot of Episode III (immediately after the roll-up).

Events in the second clone war toon series also directly set the stage for the Episode III roll-up, which refers to events occurring in the second animated series, conferring on this at least a semi-canonical status (unlike the rest of the "Expanded Universe" materials).

This presents Episode III spoiler-avoiders with a unique dilemmaopportunity. Watching the antimated clone war series ain’t really spoiling Episode III for oneself if Lucas has put the material out there specifically to set the stage for Episode III, so you could watch them in good conscience.

If you wanna do that, how do you go about doing it?

Well, chapters 1-20 are now out on a DVD called Star Wars: Clone Wars, Volume 1.

You can also read a brief, spoiler-light summary of them here.

Chapters 21-25, the ones that immediately set the stage for Episode III aren’t on DVD yet (and I haven’t been able to find out when they will be) BUT, for a limited time only, you can

WATCH THEM ONLINE HERE.

For those who care about such things, here is my non-spoiler review of the two series:

The first twenty chapters were produced as 3 1/2 minute segments which, together, form a story 69 minutes long. The need to have each 3 1/2 minutes form a self-contained chapter severely hampers story development and tilts the series too heavily toward action rather than plot or character development, though Star Wars fans will still want to see the series. In my opinion the series gets better as it goes, with more plot and character development occuring as it progresses. The action also gets better, and the climax of Annakin’s personal arc is particularly effective, as it is clear he is still moving toward the Dark Side.

The second series of five episodes has chapters that are twelve minutes long (for a total of an hour), and this makes a night-and-day difference. Suddenly there is far more room for plot and character development, and the second series is far superior to the first. The series is more richly-drawn, both metaphorically (better character development) and literally (better animation). The backgrounds are particularly good (even though I saw them on a 2" x 3" screen). There are significant bits of Jedi lore that are filled in, and the climactic battle that sets the stage for Episode III really has some surprisingly dramatic action, including intense and creative light saber work that I’m hoping they copy (or even surpass) on the big screen.

Tenth Planet Discovered!

(Reuters) Science-fiction writers have long dreamed about the legendary Planet X, but now scientists have actually discovered it. Astronomers at the Griffith Park Observatory in Los Angeles today announced the discovery of the solar system’s tenth planet.

"This is a tremendously exciting discovery," said Olaf Gustafsen, the observatory’s chief astronomer. "The last time a planet was discovered was in 1930, and even that has been controversial."

Gustafsen refers to the discovery of Pluto, an object so tiny that many have suggested it is not a planet at all but is instead one of the many objects of the solar system’s Kuiper belt.

"There’s no doubt about the new planet," Gustafsen said. "It’s larger than four other planets of the solar system–Pluto, Mercury, Mars, and Venus–making Planet X a rival for earth in size."

The object has been temporarily named called "Planet X" by astronomers because it is the tenth planet discovered, and "X" is Latin for "ten."

Astronomers plan to give it a new name with a mythological origin in the near future. "Personally, I’m rooting for ‘Yuggoth,’" said Gustafsen.

The planet was discovered with the aide of high powered computing equipment being used to identify individual objects within the Kuiper belt.

"The object was so large compared to all the known Kuiper belt objects that we couldn’t believe it," Gustafsen said. "At first we thought it was just a practical joke being played by a colleague typing in phony data on a computer, but it turned out to be real."

Despite its vast distance from the sun, which Gustafsen says is a staggering 98 million miles, scientists have been able to determine a remarkable number of things about Planet X. For example, it has one large moon, it has a nickle-iron core, and it has a rotational period almost identical to the earth, compared to most planets, which have very different rotational periods.

"Surprising as it may seem," Gustafsen says, "rotationally this is a daily planet."

GET THE STORY.