Coming Soon To A Cellphone Near You

Admen are secretly plotting to invade your cellphone with their evil advertising.

They feel they have to: People’s reliance on television is waning in the face of cellphones, laptops, Blackberrys, and similar devices that all have one thing in common: They’re distractions from watching television.

Furthermore, folks are buying devices (like digital recorders) that allow them to avoid commercials even when they are watching television.

It’s an adman’s worst nightmare.

Yet he’s got a problem: We already have laws against telemarketing people if they don’t acquiesce to it. (I never do. As soon as I realize I’m talking to a telemarketer, I tell him to take my number off his list and not to call again. Consequently, I almost never get telemarketing calls.)

And nobody’s going to buy a phone that forces you to watch or listen to a commercial when you want to make or receive a call.

We also have ample demonstration of the public’s refusal to have spam invade their e-mail boxes in the form of laws against this that will stiffen and become more effective with time (or else e-mail will go the way of the dinosaur and be replaced by a better, spam-secure system).

So what’s an evil adman to do?

Create content that is compelling enough that you’ll seek it out and be willing to put up with the advertising it contains.

This works in principle: It’s the principle on which TV shows support themselves: You tune in for the content and are willing to tolerate the advertisting.

But can it work on your cell phone? There are folks talking about producing mini-TV shows for cell phones (many of which now have color screens on which such shows could be watched). They even exist already in some countries. But can content that compelling be done under the format constraints a cellphone poses?

Time will tell.

In the meantime, the evil admen scheme and dream in their sinister sunken city.

GET THE STORY.

Photo Caption

STARTING CAPTIONS:

  • Bush Out For Stroll With "The Little Woman."
  • CLOSE FRIENDS: President Is Larger-Than-Life Figure
  • On Trip to Pope’s Funeral, Former President Clinton Spikes First Lady’s Drink With Shrinking Potion!

(Cowboy hat tip to the reader who e-mailed this and suggested the last caption!)

The Script: EXPOSED!

Timespope Y’know how I’ve been writing about the templates that news organizations want to pour their stories into? A common one is the "conflict between two parties or points of view" template.

Theoretically, this is a balanced way of doing the news, but often it’s possible to tell the true biases of the folks doing the story.

LIKE IN THIS NYT-NOID STORY (QUOTING HANS KUNG NO LESS) WHICH CRITICIZES JOHN PAUL II AFTER HIS DEATH AND HAS THE LINE "NEED SOME QUOTE FROM SUPPORTER" AS A PLACEHOLDER THAT NEVER GOT DISPLACED.

They yanked the line from their web site, but quick!

Powerline comments:

There you have it. The Times’ criticisms are ready to go, a few good words for the Pope are an afterthought.

VIEW THE FULL SCREEN-GRAB OF THE NYT STORY.

(Cowboy hat tip to the reader who e-mailed!)

Take A Look At This

Walkertech1

What is it?

A still from Episode VI from a walker on the forrest moon of Endor?

A still from Episode III from a walker on Kashyyk?

Neither!

It’s not on an alien planet (even in the movies), and it has nothing to do with science fiction.

It’s a shot taken from the cabin of THIS:

Walkertech2

YES! That’s RIGHT! We now have walker technology here on Earth!

As you can see, it hasn’t evolved very far and is still at the grashopper stage, but it’s still real-life walker tech!

The above application is used to cut down trees.

And, as you can tell from the distinctive paint job, it’s made by John Deere!

YEE-HAW!

GET THE STORY.

Also,

PEEP WHAT THEY’RE THINKING ABOUT BUILDING.

Televised Catholic Funeral At-Home Etiquette

A reader writes:

This has been bothering me for a while but since tomorrow’s funeral Mass for the Pope will be televised, it has galvanized my will to email you about this. Some of these may seem very trite but I have a rationale for asking.

There are no bad questions, only bad answers.

1) When I watch a Mass on TV (i.e, on EWTN, or the funeral Mass for the Pope), may I plan on having a spiritual communion when the Eucharist is distributed?

You may.

2) If I can/do have spiritual communion, is it recommended that I observe the fast for Eucharist?

It is not. The Eucharistic fast is for preparation for the sacramental reception of the Eucharist, not its spiritual reception. You can make a spiritual act of communion with Jesus (i.e., the Eucharist) at any hour of the day or night with no fasting.

3) Would it be totally illicit and/or crass to have breakfast while watching the Mass for the Pope tomorrow if I cannot/do not partake in spiritual communion during the televised Mass?

It is not illicit as there is no law against doing so. Neither would it be crass as long as one isn’t engaging in a gluttinous, debauched feast or something like that. While the impulse to ask the question displays a praiseworthy concern for propriety, you should not indulge yourself very far in that direction as it could very quickly lead one into scrupulosity. Being at home while something is on TV is not the same as being at the event itself, and the standards of conduct that would apply in the latter case simply do not apply in the former. If we don’t feel the need to get dressed up in our Sunday best to watch a funeral on TV, neither do we need to refrain from eating while it’s on.

Any and all commentary you can deliver about this would be much appreciated. You’re one in a billion, Jimmy, and I really enjoy reading your blog! Keep up the good work.

One in a billion???

You mean that there are six of me???

(NOTE TO SELF: Must track down and eliminate my five clones.)

20 (with respect to the eating questions.)

Encyclical Bleg

I have a project that I want to do with the encyclicals of John Paul II to make them more accessible to folks, but I need some help from someone with more scripting experience than me.

Here’s the deal: I’ve got the encyclicals in HTML format, but I need to have the footnotes and (preferably) the parenthetical Scripture references STRIPPED OUT of them.

I could do this with my limited scripting experience, but it would be a needlessly long and painful process.

THEREFORE,

If someone with more scripting experience than I would like to step up to the plate and volunteer, I’d be most appreciative.

Lemme know.

More details on request.

Much obliged!

So long, and thanks for all the fish!

Bill Clinton On Pope's Legacy

The former president has succumbed to the temptation to go in for snipish remarks regarding the late holy father, commenting to the press that John Paul II “centralized authority in the papacy again and enforced a very conservative theological doctrine. There will be debates about that. The number of Catholics increased by 250 million on his watch. But the numbers of priests didn’t. He’s like all of us – he may have a mixed legacy.”

LESS.

Bill Clinton On Pope’s Legacy

The former president has succumbed to the temptation to go in for snipish remarks regarding the late holy father, commenting to the press that John Paul II “centralized authority in the papacy again and enforced a very conservative theological doctrine. There will be debates about that. The number of Catholics increased by 250 million on his watch. But the numbers of priests didn’t. He’s like all of us – he may have a mixed legacy.”

LESS.

LUTHERAN: "He Was My Pope, Too!"

In Christianity Today, Lutheran writer Uwe Siemon-Netto writes:

For the last quarter of a century, this non-Catholic has had a pope. Now that John Paul II is gone, I am even more of an orphan than the Christians in the Roman church. For they will surely have another pope, but that one may not be mine, since I haven’t converted.

I am sure I am reflecting the views of many Protestants. Who else but John Paul II gave voice to my faith and my values in 130 countries? Who else posited personal holiness and theological clarity against postmodern self-deception and egotism? Who else preached the gospel as tirelessly as this man?

GET THE STORY.

LUTHERAN: “He Was My Pope, Too!”

In Christianity Today, Lutheran writer Uwe Siemon-Netto writes:

For the last quarter of a century, this non-Catholic has had a pope. Now that John Paul II is gone, I am even more of an orphan than the Christians in the Roman church. For they will surely have another pope, but that one may not be mine, since I haven’t converted.

I am sure I am reflecting the views of many Protestants. Who else but John Paul II gave voice to my faith and my values in 130 countries? Who else posited personal holiness and theological clarity against postmodern self-deception and egotism? Who else preached the gospel as tirelessly as this man?

GET THE STORY.