December 8th is the solemnity of the Immaculate Conception.
It celebrates an important point of Catholic teaching, and in most years it is a holy day of obligation.
Here are 8 things you need to know about the teaching and the way we celebrate it.
1. Who does the Immaculate Conception refer to?
There’s a popular idea that it refers to Jesus’ conception by the Virgin Mary.
It doesn’t.
Instead, it refers to the special way in which the Virgin Mary herself was conceived.
This conception was not virginal. (That is, she had a human father as well as a human mother.) But it was special and unique in another way. . . .
2. What is the Immaculate Conception?
The Catechism of the Catholic Church explains it this way:
490 To become the mother of the Saviour, Mary “was enriched by God with gifts appropriate to such a role.” The angel Gabriel at the moment of the annunciation salutes her as “full of grace”. In fact, in order for Mary to be able to give the free assent of her faith to the announcement of her vocation, it was necessary that she be wholly borne by God’s grace.
491 Through the centuries the Church has become ever more aware that Mary, “full of grace” through God, was redeemed from the moment of her conception. That is what the dogma of the Immaculate Conception confesses, as Pope Pius IX proclaimed in 1854:
The most Blessed Virgin Mary was, from the first moment of her conception, by a singular grace and privilege of almighty God and by virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ, Saviour of the human race, preserved immune from all stain of original sin.
3. Does this mean Mary never sinned?
Yes. Because of the way redemption was applied to Mary at the moment of her conception, she not only was protected from contracting original sin but also personal sin. The Catechism explains:
493 The Fathers of the Eastern tradition call the Mother of God “the All-Holy” (Panagia), and celebrate her as “free from any stain of sin, as though fashioned by the Holy Spirit and formed as a new creature”. By the grace of God Mary remained free of every personal sin her whole life long. “Let it be done to me according to your word. . .”
4. Does this mean Mary didn’t need Jesus to die on the Cross for her?
No. What we’ve already quoted states that Mary was immaculately conceived as part of her being “full of grace” and thus “redeemed from the moment of her conception” by “a singular grace and privilege of almighty God and by virtue of the merits of Jesus Christ, Saviour of the human race.”
The Catechism goes on to state:
492 The “splendour of an entirely unique holiness” by which Mary is “enriched from the first instant of her conception” comes wholly from Christ: she is “redeemed, in a more exalted fashion, by reason of the merits of her Son”. The Father blessed Mary more than any other created person “in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places” and chose her “in Christ before the foundation of the world, to be holy and blameless before him in love”.
508 From among the descendants of Eve, God chose the Virgin Mary to be the mother of his Son. “Full of grace”, Mary is “the most excellent fruit of redemption” (SC 103): from the first instant of her conception, she was totally preserved from the stain of original sin and she remained pure from all personal sin throughout her life.
5. How does this make Mary a parallel of Eve?
Adam and Eve were both created immaculate–without original sin or its stain. They fell from grace, and through them mankind was bound to sin.
Christ and Mary were also conceived immaculate. They remained faithful, and through them mankind was redeemed from sin.
Christ is thus the New Adam, and Mary the New Eve.
The Catechism notes:
494 . . . As St. Irenaeus says, “Being obedient she became the cause of salvation for herself and for the whole human race.” Hence not a few of the early Fathers gladly assert. . .: “The knot of Eve’s disobedience was untied by Mary’s obedience: what the virgin Eve bound through her disbelief, Mary loosened by her faith.” Comparing her with Eve, they call Mary “the Mother of the living” and frequently claim: “Death through Eve, life through Mary.”
6. How does this make Mary an icon of our own destiny?
Those who die in God’s friendship and thus go to heaven will be freed from all sin and stain of sin. We will thus all be rendered “immaculate” (Latin, immaculatus = “stainless”) if we remain faithful to God.
Even in this life, God purifies us and trains us in holiness and, if we die in his friendship but imperfectly purified, he will purify us in purgatory and render us immaculate.
By giving Mary this grace from the first moment of her conception, God showed us an image of our own destiny. He shows us that this is possible for humans by his grace.
John Paul II noted:
In contemplating this mystery in a Marian perspective, we can say that “Mary, at the side of her Son, is the most perfect image of freedom and of the liberation of humanity and of the universe. It is to her as Mother and Model that the Church must look in order to understand in its completeness the meaning of her own mission” (Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, Libertatis conscientia, 22 March, 1986, n. 97; cf. Redemptoris Mater, n. 37).
Let us fix our gaze, then, on Mary, the icon of the pilgrim Church in the wilderness of history but on her way to the glorious destination of the heavenly Jerusalem, where she [the Church] will shine as the Bride of the Lamb, Christ the Lord [General Audience, March 14, 2001].
7. Was it necessary for God to make Mary immaculate at her conception so that she could be Jesus’ mother?
No. The Church only speaks of the Immaculate Conception as something that was “fitting,” something that made Mary a “fit habitation” (i.e., suitable dwelling) for the Son of God, not something that was necessary. Thus in preparing to define the dogma, Pope Pius IX stated:
And hence they [the Church Fathers] affirmed that the Blessed Virgin was, through grace, entirely free from every stain of sin, and from all corruption of body, soul and mind; that she was always united with God and joined to him by an eternal covenant; that she was never in darkness but always in light; and that, therefore, she was entirely a fit habitation for Christ, not because of the state of her body, but because of her original grace. . . .
For it was certainly not fitting that this vessel of election should be wounded by the common injuries, since she, differing so much from the others, had only nature in common with them, not sin. In fact, it was quite fitting that, as the Only-Begotten has a Father in heaven, whom the Seraphim extol as thrice holy, so he should have a Mother on earth who would never be without the splendor of holiness [Ineffabilis Deus].
8. How do we celebrate the Immaculate Conception today?
In the Latin rite of the Catholic Church, December 8th is the solemnity of the Immaculate Conception, and it is a holy day of obligation.
In the United States, the obligation to attend Mass exists even though it immediately follows a Sunday this year.
Hello Jimmy,
thanks a lot for this, once again! I am sure you wanted to use “countries” and not years here:
“It celebrates an important point of Catholic teaching, and in most years it is a holy day of obligation”.
or I should try another way of reading it (as there are 4 meanings of Scripture ;)).
“December 8th is ordinarily celebrated as the solemnity of the Immaculate Conception, but this year in the U.S., it’s being celebrated on Monday, December 9th.”
Jimmy, check your calendar: This year the solemnity of the Immaculate Conception is being celebrated as it ordinarily is, on Monday, December 8th.
Today is Monday December 8th. The dates in the above article are confusing to me….
Jimmy, could you clarify this for me?
It was necessary that Mary be made immaculate at some point prior to, or at the moment of, the annunciation, without which she would not be able to “give the free assent of her faith” (CCC 490), but it was not necessary, though fitting, that she be made immaculate at the moment of her conception? Either way, it was necessary that she be made immaculate in order to be Jesus’ mother. I think I just cleared up my confusion in formulating my comment.
It will always draw down to such Love and mercy of God for us. The opposite of Eve is the completion of both from Eve to Mary.God is perfectly in His image for us.Drawing us near to Him.The maternal and paternal love of God is with us.Through Mary and Christ.
Informative article of the kind we have come to expect from Jim. There is a small glitch in the e-mail message I received, though. It tells me the solemnity is being celebrated this year Monday, Dec. 9. I think this may have been copied from a previous year.
What do you think of the term “predeemed” to describe Mary’s Immaculate Conception?
Jimmy, you probably know this already but you are referring to Dec 8 not being today Monday in this blog, but of course it is. Thank you so much for these truly educational and informative messages. You have helped me already in becoming better in my diaconal ministry. God bless you always.
Thank you Jimmy for the beautiful witness that you are. What a loving son.
I love Our Blessed Mother. I love to ponder the Annunciation. She was young, a virgin, yet trusted implicitly and immediately. So sweet.
Being full of grace and untouched by any sin, would this mean that Mary would not have had to suffer labor pains. Pain and suffering were the result of sin (can’t remember the scripture). What does the church say about this?
I rather hope she didn’t have to. But ,I know, a rather moot point, knowing that she had many sorrows during her life.
Blessings
Nancy
I don’t understand the part at the beginning of the email where you say we celebrate it this year on Monday Dec 9th. Today is Monday December 8th and we are celebrating it today. Tomorrow is Tuesday December 9th. What am I missing here?
Living a life on this fallen Earth is rotten experience. We cannot comprehend how rotten it is because we live here and have nothing to compare it to. Plus, we are pretty rotten ourselves.
I cannot imagine what it would be like to be a sinless human being and waking up to face a day here. It would be a marathon endurance session having to face the petty selfishness of everyone around you. A perfect person’s heart would break a thousand times over from watching cruelty one person can have for another. I do not think a perfect human being would make it a week, unless he were also God.
Making a perfect person live on a fallen Earth would be utterly humiliating and cruel. No, I don’t believe in Mary’s Immaculate Conception.
Our hearts are not perfect.
We work to perfect our hearts, so that we may know and love God increasingly.
We are called to do so by the grace given to us by God.
The more closely our heart emulates that of Christ, the more the evils of this will break our heart as it breaks Jesus’ heart.
Does this make God cruel? Of course not!
Should read “…the evils of this world will…””
A sinless human being constantly walks with God. It would be constant joy. Mary made it more than a week, not because she is God, but by the grace of God.
“Living a life on this fallen earth is rotten experience.” Only if we choose that–and most of us do, at least from time-to-time. I know I often have to give myself pep talks. Usually I remind myself that one of the fruits of the Holy Spirit, one of the marks of a Christian, is JOY!
Having in her being so many graces and blessings, and so much love of God and His creation, Mary would have enough love of her fellow humans to see the beauty God has gifted them, and though her heart would break at their cruelty, her heart would also be healed by God’s grace and the beauty in His creation.
Jay D, I thought your post was great up until the point where you said you don’t believe in the immaculate conception. It is by the grace of God that Mary was able to endure having her heart broken “a thousand times over”. That’s the point. Thanks be to God.
I need clarification please. Mary never sinned and was incapable of sinning because she was immaculately conceived. How then did Eve come to sin when she was conceived the same way?