Jeb, Call Your Brother NOW!

It’s time for an intervention in the Bush family.

I know that, as governor of Florida, you are very concerned about the troubles your state is in as a result of Hurricane Wilma. You have a lot of troubles on your plate right now, and our prayers are with you and the Floridians who are suffering from this natural disaster.

But there is another matter that you and other family members must attend to. The Bushes are a political family that seeks to be one of the premier families of American politics, like the Kennedies used to be. But your brother, the president, is rapidly destroying the family’s chances of continuing to play a leading role in American politics.

Your father, it must be admitted, is not fondly remembered. He was elected in order to continue the conservative vision of Ronald Reagan but instead he is judged to be as a mediocre successor who made glaring mistakes that have permanently tarnished his reputation. Chief among these were raising taxes, failing to deal with Saddam Hussein at the end of the Gulf War, and appointing the walking abomination of David Souter to the Supreme Court.

Your brother is in the process of making parallel mistakes.

Though he was smart enough to pass tax cuts that have stimulated the economy, his flagrant and unconstrained government spending is likely to eradicate the good done by lowering taxes.

The current Iraq War is, as you know, a real political albatross. Your brother’s intentions may have been good and going to war may have been the right decision at the time, but the failure to find WMDs and the ongoing insurgency have given your opponents all the resources they need to use this war as a colossal embarrasment to your brother.

Now we come to the Harriet Miers situation.

As you know, it’s a catastrophic mess that was created when your brother went against the advice of his advisors and picked a stealth nominee who also plays into the cronyism charges to which your brother is vulnerable. The problems with Harriet Miers are so numerous that I can’t possibly go into them now, but the important point is that your brother has totally welshed on his promise to appoint justices like Scalia and Thomas.

He has stabbed the conservative movement in the back at a moment that should have been the culmination of thirty years of intense effort to take back the Court from the justices who have been usurping the democratic process in this nation and imposing their own values on the land.

Your father is ill-remembered for his "Read my lips: No new taxes" promise, which the then broke. Your brother is now in the process of similarly destroying his own reputation with conservatives by breaking his promise to appoint justices like Scalia and Thomas.

For further background on the scope of the disaster, please read

THIS ARTICLE BY JUDGE BORK

AND THIS ARTICLE BY THE WASHINGTON POST ON MIERS’ JUDICIAL PHILOSOPHY

AND THIS ARTICLE (FROM YESTERDAY) BY ROD DREHER ON HOW YOUR BROTHER HAS REPEATEDLY BETRAYED THE CONSERVATIVE MOVEMENT AND NOW THE CHICKENS ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST.

I mean, you read these things and it’s simply flabbergasting. The incoherence and inconsistency of Miers’ views cries out for explanation, and the likely explanations are not good ones. One of my blog readers insightfully commented:

When she sent back the pro-life questionnaire, she was running for
political office as a conservative in a conservative city. I think
political exigencies are enough to explain it, especially considering
the paucity of other evidence as to her being pro-life (like church
attendance and paying the minimum to attend a pro-life dinner once).
Choosing between the quesionnaire filled out while running for office
and the speech given while not running for office, I give the speech
more weight, especially since it is at a later date after the election
of Bill Clinton and after the Casey decision. At best, she plays to the
crowd she’s with and that is a very bad thing for a prospective justice to do.

Before reading that article, I thought she was probably O’Connor II
with fewer qualifications. Now I think she’s as likely to turn out to
be Harry Blackmun in a dress, both in terms of mediocrity and in terms
of judicial philosophy.

Blackmun in a dress is very possibly correct! She may actually be worse than Souter!

The longer her nomination remains in place, the worse things are for your brother. His bridges to his base get more burned with every day that goes by. It’s time for a swift and dramatic course correction.

This is not only for purposes of salvaging your brother’s reputation and his ability to accomplish anything in his remaining three years in office, it’s also for purposes of protecting the family’s legacy and political future.

I mean, your father was something that conservatives had to overlook in nominating your brother for the presidency. "Yeah, we know the first Bush was bad–a phony conservative–but this one is better–he’s a real conservative" was the message.

Now it looks like that is not the case and that your brother is a phony conservative, too.

Frankly, I don’t care what his personal views are as long as he delivers where it counts, and where it counts is the Supreme Court.

So let me tell you what will happen if the Miers nomination goes forward and (God forbid) she gets on the Supreme Court and turns out to be anything other than a firm originalist: Conservatives will not trust your family with the chance to run for the presidency again.

The first President Bush was a "fool me once" situation, and the second President Bush is turning into a "fool me twice"situation. There will be no third President Bush.

The message that will be driven home to the conservative base is: "You can’t trust the Bushes. They’re phony conservatives who will lie to get into office and then stab you in the back by breaking their most important campaign promises. They’re Big Government big spenders, they’ll get you into bungled wars in the Middle East, and they’ll put walking disasters on the Supreme Court. You simply can’t trust them. Find someone else."

Now, as a Bush, you presumably have a much more positive image of your family than this, but this is the image of your family that will be confirmed in the minds of the conservative base if things are put right in a hurry.

Your brother being notoriously stubborn, though, means that he may dig in his heels and resist putting things right.

That’s where you (and other family members) come in.

For the sake of your brother, the sake of your family, and the sake of the nation, it is time for an intervention in the Bush family.

Please, Jeb, pick up the phone.

Author: Jimmy Akin

Jimmy was born in Texas, grew up nominally Protestant, but at age 20 experienced a profound conversion to Christ. Planning on becoming a Protestant seminary professor, he started an intensive study of the Bible. But the more he immersed himself in Scripture the more he found to support the Catholic faith, and in 1992 he entered the Catholic Church. His conversion story, "A Triumph and a Tragedy," is published in Surprised by Truth. Besides being an author, Jimmy is the Senior Apologist at Catholic Answers, a contributing editor to Catholic Answers Magazine, and a weekly guest on "Catholic Answers Live."

10 thoughts on “Jeb, Call Your Brother NOW!”

  1. Every day I pray to wake up and find that this nightmare is over.
    As pained as I am over the nomination, I’m almost (but not quite) as pained by the defense of the nomination. The whole “She’s an Evangelical Christian, ya know [wink][wink]…” thing. The only thing I could think was “Oh my gosh! They think that we’re just as stupid and hypocritical as the liberals say we are.” No thought at all for elevating a great conservative mind to the court. Just, “hey she’ll vote right.” Not in accord with the Constitution, but just that she’ll cheat in our favor (maybe).
    The day this nomination goes though is the day my collection of Bush/Cheney polo shirts hits the fire place. The Constitution Party is looking better and better all the time…

  2. Jimmy, you have been right on re: this debacle, and I thank you for your tireless efforts to get people motivated to make their horror known. Hopefully we can stop this. Also, fyi, if you read her response to the Senate questionnaire (its in the Washington Post) she served years ago as the Dallas Chairman of the Advisory committee to an organization called Girls, Inc. If that sounds familiar to you, its because it is the pro-abortion, pro-contraception gang that is causing the American Girl company so much heat for their recent collaboration/fund raising effort.

  3. Thanks for compiling the articles and providing a forum for this discussion.
    The Meirs’ nomination just gets more and more disturbing everyday. I agree with LawfulGood that the defense of Meirs, pointing to her as an evangelical Christian and suggesting that she’ll vote the right way on challenges to Roe is ludicrous.
    In the articles that you show-cased, and elsewhere, evidence is mounting that she has not held a consistently Pro-Life position. We already knew that she was not someone highly experienced (or even interested) in Constitutional Issues. Faced with the actual decision, and balancing constitutional arguments — we can’t even say how Roberts will come out in a challenge to Roe, let alone how Meirs would. Wishful thinking just doesn’t cut it.
    This nomination is a disaster. However, in the face of the obvious, President Bush is once again showing an unbecoming stubborness and refusing to admit that he made a mistake. So, I pray that before Ms. Meirs embarasses herself (beginning with the November 7 hearings) and further embarasses the President, she would just save face and withdraw. That would be the noble thing to do.

  4. Thank God it’s over!
    Can we all make-up now. Please?
    Rebel Alliance and Loyalist Army, friends forever, enemies never…

  5. Thank God it’s over!
    Can we all make-up now. Please?
    Rebel Alliance and Loyalist Army, friends forever, enemies never…

    Amen to that.

Comments are closed.