Ratzinger's Nice! . . . Who Knew?

Actually, a lot of us knew.

Ratzinger is and always has been a cool guy, but the media’s lust for portraying every story in terms of conflict and hyperbole has led many to view him as a theological "rottweiler." The media and the secular intelligentia still view him in that light, but many–including many of the faithful–have been won over by his humble, gentle manner now that he’s pope.

HERE’S SOME INTERESTING ANALYSIS FROM SANDRO MAGISTER OF B16’S GOVERNING STYLE IN HIS FIRST THREE MONTHS IN OFFICE.

Ratzinger’s Nice! . . . Who Knew?

Actually, a lot of us knew.

Ratzinger is and always has been a cool guy, but the media’s lust for portraying every story in terms of conflict and hyperbole has led many to view him as a theological "rottweiler." The media and the secular intelligentia still view him in that light, but many–including many of the faithful–have been won over by his humble, gentle manner now that he’s pope.

HERE’S SOME INTERESTING ANALYSIS FROM SANDRO MAGISTER OF B16’S GOVERNING STYLE IN HIS FIRST THREE MONTHS IN OFFICE.

Blasphemed Among The Gentiles

Last week I pointed out that LifeSiteNews.Com has been waging an anti-Harry Potter campaign based on a thank you note written several years ago by Cardinal Ratzinger or an assistant of his. LifeSite presented the story under the headline "Pope Benedict Opposes Harry Potter Novels"–which was problematic for REASONS THAT I EXPLAINED (ALSO HERE).

In one of the posts, I wrote:

Some of the people seeing the LifeSite-inspired headlines on this
subject will be non-Catholic fans of Harry Potter, and in their
estimation the Catholic Church will have the Church’s credibility
lowered one more notch.

Thanks, LifeSite.

"It is written, ‘The name of  God is blasphemed among the Gentiles because of you’" (Romans 2:24).

Now, some might be dubious of this, but it’s no joke. On this matter, let me point to what the Pontificator has written:

I know this news is going to make life a lot harder for the papists in
the Pontificator household. The lone Episcopalian holdout in our home
is the Pontificator’s Greatest Progeny (PGP). She also just happens to
be one of the world’s great experts on Harry Potter. No doubt
Ratzinger’s recently published two-year old, non-authoritative,
private, and perhaps uncritical comments will be noted in her diary as
one more reason why she should not convert to Rome. Friends, I think a novena and all that other good Catholic prayer stuff may be in order
here [SOURCE].

Amen.

And I hope LifeSite meditates on the scandal that will be caused by their opportunistic manufacture of this "story"–just "coincidentally" timed with the release of the latest Harry Potter novel.

Now, before I forget, let me issue THE BIG RED DISCLAIMER: I am not
a fan of the Harry Potter novels. In order to be able to comment
apologetically on the Harry Potter phenomenon, I read the first novel
and watched the first two movies. I was not at all impressed with them
as literature, and I recognize that they can have a harmful spiritual
effect on some readers, especially among the young. I also recognize
that they are not an apologia for paganism and that a reader who is
secure in his faith will not be magically turned into a neo-pagan by
reading them.

Just Like a Fine Wine

RedhatAs an artist, I feel an obligation to look for beauty in the world and draw attention to it. Beauty deserves praise, and people benefit from giving praise where it is due.

To that end, I would like to call your attention to the man in the red hat. No, that is not the late Gene Scott, and no, this is not the beauty that I spoke of earlier. The man in the red hat is Gerry Rafferty, and it is his music to which I would like to call your attention.

Let me back up a bit… 1978. Disco was all over the radio, and punk had fought back, kicking and gouging. The New Wave had not yet broken. I had my favorite songs, like everyone, but there was one song that could turn me in to a road hazard every time I heard it on the car radio: Gerry Rafferty’s "Baker Street", which sported the most arresting hook and spine-tingling sax line ever devised in pop music. I often pulled over just to listen to it (ah, to be 17 again…). It was completely unique, and sheer genius.

So a couple days ago I’m poking around on Google, playing a round of "Whatever Happened To…" when I thought of Rafferty and decided to see what he’s been up to lately. Fortunately he has been making music, and his skills have not dulled, but matured. His new release, Another World, is a masterpiece. You want to talk about melodic structure? Vocal harmony? Spiritual depth? You don’t listen to this music, it just washes over you. But I’m gushing.

You can find out more about Mr. Rafferty and his music at his website, which features several free music downloads, including two traditional Christmas carols. If you have ever heard the National Anthem butchered by a showy vocalist (and who hasn’t?) you will appreciate his beautiful, understated harmonies.
Did I mention he also has a free download of his rendition of the Kyrie Eleison?

Enjoy…

The Data On Fiber

Weight_track_07_2005In my previous post I showed you a 12-day weight track starting June 20th and ending July 2nd.

Here’s a 12-day track starting July 4th (click to enlarge).

Look at the two carefully. You’ll notice two differences:

First, if you observe the trendline, you’ll see that I lost more weight in this period. Previously I lost about 3.5 lbs, but this time I lost about 4.5 lbs. (And, as the next couple of days that aren’t on this track revealed, it was more like 5.5 lbs.)

Second, you’ll note that the daily ups and downs have levelled out dramatically. The line of weight readings (the dark one) approximates the trendline much more closely, without the dramatic departures shown on the previous weight track. Now the daily weigh-ins are all within about a pound of the trendline.

Why?

Both of these phenomena have the same cause: Fiber. In the July 2-4 period I ramped up the amount of fiber in my diet. There was already a good bit in it, but I got serious and ramped it up to the point that I am consuming something like 45-60 grams of powdered fiber a day, in addition to the fiber in my food (probably another 10-15 grams). Another change is that during this period I switched between pure psyllium husks and a mixed fiber supplement, which is better.

As I reported previously, fiber fills you up real good and decreases appetite. As a result, I ate less food in this period (without hunger) and lost more weight (an extra two pounds). Now I have the data to prove it, so I wanted to share it with you.

Unexpected was the fact that the ups and downs would even out the way they did. On this track I had to wait a lot less time before hitting a new weight low. Indeed, sometimes I hit a new weight low more than one day in a row before an upturn.

That’s motivation!

. . . And another reason to use high levels of fiber when dieting.

Weight Tracking

Weight_track_06_2005_3There is debate in dieting circles about how often you ought to weigh yourself. One popular theory holds that you should only do it once a week.

Why? Because there are a lot of ups and downs in your weight from day to day (and even within the day) depending on how much food and water you have in the system at the time. Since dieters who are successfully losing weight tend to lose only one or two pounds a week, these losses are likely to get, uh, lost amid all the daily fluctuations. Then the dieter will get discouraged, feel his is not losing an weight, and quit.

To solve this, the solution mentioned above wants the dieter to weigh himself as infrequently as possible so that there is more of a chance of him seeing an actual loss when he (finally) steps on the scale, motivating him to keep going.

Forget that!

I’m firmly on the side of the dieters who weigh themselves daily. Indeed, I weigh myself multiple times a day.

How do I overcome seeing all the ups and downs? I keep track of them. What I do is take my lowest weigh-in of the day (typically early in the morning, before I start eating and drinking) and log it in Microsoft Excel. I then use the charting feature to graph what my weight’s doing, as in the chart above, which shows a twelve-day track of my weight starting June 20th (click to enlarge).

As you can see, it has significant ups and downs. But the nice thing about tracking your progress in a charting-capable program is that you can hae it add a trendline that will filter out the ups and downs and give you a better sense of your progress.

As you can see from this chart, I lost about three and a half pounds over the twelve day span of the track.

There are still lots of ups and downs. Note that I had a major low on June 27, but I didn’t get back to that level again in the period. If I’d weighed myself on that day and then again seven days later (not shown on this chart), my weight would have actually registered an increase, but the increase would have been illustory because it was due to food and water in the system, not actual weight gain. I would have then felt unrewarded for my week of dieting and would have had to live under that cloud for another week until I could weigh myself again.

I’d find that discouraging!

And so, for me at least, it’s much better for my morale to indulge my tendency to microanalyze phenomena and weigh myself daily, using the marvels of modern technology to look past the ups and downs and give me a better representation of my progress.

Rehnquist v. O'Connor

Two stories floated side by side at CNN:

Senators Urge [Sandra Day] O’Connor To Reconsider Retirement

[William] Rehnquist Silences Retirement Speculation

In the first story, four notoriously pro-abortion senators (although Mary Landrieu of Louisiana has a "mixed record" despite her EMILY List recommendation) have urged Justice O’Connor not to retire, piously asserting that "You possess moderation, dignity and integrity, and have demonstrated the highest standards of legal excellence" and urging that President Bush name her as Chief Justice Rehnquist’s replacement:

"In a copy of the letter obtained by CNN, Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-California, Mary Landrieu, D-Louisiana, Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, urged the 75-year-old jurist to return to the court as the chief justice of the United States to avoid what could be a messy confirmation fight over her successor.

"’As United States senators with the constitutional responsibility of "advice and consent," we would strongly recommend to President Bush that he nominate you as chief justice,’ the letter said."

Uh huh.  And had John Kerry won election in 2004 would these senators still recommend that O’Connor be named Chief Justice or would they be clamoring for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

In any event, Chief Justice Rehnquist has apparently tired of the Retirement Watch surrounding him lately and has stated that, despite health difficulties, he intends to continue in office as long as he can:

"’I want to put to rest the speculation and unfounded rumors of my imminent retirement,’ Rehnquist said in a statement released through his family. ‘I am not about to announce my retirement. I will continue to perform my duties as chief justice as long as my health permits.’"

Point of protocol:  As a side note, and to sound off on a pet peeve of mine, the Chief Justice’s title is not "Chief Justice of the Supreme Court."  It is Chief Justice of the United States.

<Commercial>Get Catholic Answers’ booklet Supreme Injustice: The Looming Disaster in America’s Highest Court written by your gracious blog host, Jimmy Akin.</commercial>

Rehnquist v. O’Connor

Two stories floated side by side at CNN:

Senators Urge [Sandra Day] O’Connor To Reconsider Retirement

[William] Rehnquist Silences Retirement Speculation

In the first story, four notoriously pro-abortion senators (although Mary Landrieu of Louisiana has a "mixed record" despite her EMILY List recommendation) have urged Justice O’Connor not to retire, piously asserting that "You possess moderation, dignity and integrity, and have demonstrated the highest standards of legal excellence" and urging that President Bush name her as Chief Justice Rehnquist’s replacement:

"In a copy of the letter obtained by CNN, Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-California, Mary Landrieu, D-Louisiana, Susan Collins, R-Maine, and Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, urged the 75-year-old jurist to return to the court as the chief justice of the United States to avoid what could be a messy confirmation fight over her successor.

"’As United States senators with the constitutional responsibility of "advice and consent," we would strongly recommend to President Bush that he nominate you as chief justice,’ the letter said."

Uh huh.  And had John Kerry won election in 2004 would these senators still recommend that O’Connor be named Chief Justice or would they be clamoring for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg?

In any event, Chief Justice Rehnquist has apparently tired of the Retirement Watch surrounding him lately and has stated that, despite health difficulties, he intends to continue in office as long as he can:

"’I want to put to rest the speculation and unfounded rumors of my imminent retirement,’ Rehnquist said in a statement released through his family. ‘I am not about to announce my retirement. I will continue to perform my duties as chief justice as long as my health permits.’"

Point of protocol:  As a side note, and to sound off on a pet peeve of mine, the Chief Justice’s title is not "Chief Justice of the Supreme Court."  It is Chief Justice of the United States.

<Commercial>Get Catholic Answers’ booklet Supreme Injustice: The Looming Disaster in America’s Highest Court written by your gracious blog host, Jimmy Akin.</commercial>