National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL) head Nancy Keenan has written a letter to pro-lifers asking for their help (WARNING! Evil file format! [.pdf]).
Wellllllll now. . . . Isn’t that "special."
Let’s see what she has to say:
RIGHT-TO-LIFE MOVEMENT FROM
NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA
Hm. Help NARAL prevent abortions? They’ve seen the light and are joining our side? They’re changing their name to NURAL (National Unborn Rights Action League)? Doesn’t sound plausible. The credibility quotient of professional babykillers is low. Must be on lookout for incompetent attempts at deception.
For years, your groups and ours have waged one of the country’s most divisive political wars over a woman’s right to choose to kill her own offspring.
True.
We believe passionately that women have the right to decide for themselves when to
bring children into the worldkill their own children [sorry, the kids are already "in the world" as soon as they’re conceived] – without government interference. You disagree – passionately and sincerely.
Darn tootin’!
We will never resolve our differences on this basic question.
If by "we" you mean most individuals who are alive in the pro-abort movement right now and most individual pro-lifers, you are correct. Though some individuals may convert from one side to the other, most of the most committed members of both sides will remain where they are. On the other hand, if you mean our movements will always be locked in this struggle, no. Pro-lifers reproduce themselves while pro-aborts do not. Eventually, your movement will wither for demographic reasons (a phenomenon dubbed "the Roe effect"), leaving the pro-life movement free to protect unborn children again. The only question is how long it will take to stop the abortion holocaust you have initiated and how many millions of children will be murdered in the meantime.
But we should agree on an equally fundamental point: America would be a better country if no woman ever faced the difficult choices posed by an unintended pregnancy.
Yeah, and it would be a better country if there was no such thing as cancer, heart disease, obesity, or AIDS and in which nobody had to work for a living and nobody ever disagreed with anybody or had to do anything they didn’t want to do and we all had superpowers.
Furthermore, what’s all this dissing of "unintended pregnancies." Used to be a lot of folks would be excited when they got pregnant even though they weren’t intending to do so this month. Babies were looked forward to as positive things and as gifts from God. Some folks still take such attitudes, despite your propaganda campaign to equate "unintended pregnances" with unwanted babies.
What better way to end the debate (as if ending debate were an end in itself) over abortion rights than by eliminating the reasons women seek abortion?
You mean you want to change the facts that abortions are permitted by law and people have been propagandized to regard them as morally licit and to regard babies as an unwanted burden rather than as a positive contribution to humanity? Heck, yeah! I’m all up for changing those facts!
The time has come to join together in a new campaign to reduce the number of abortions.
DANGER, WILL ROBINSON, DANGER!!! IMPENDING INCOMPETENT DECEPTION ATTEMPT!!!
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid – who slightly disagrees with us only so he can protect his Mormon base on the issue of abortion – has offered a
commonsensedeceptive bill deceptively called the Prevention First Act which would help reduceunintended pregnanciesunwanted babies through better access to often-abortifacientbirth controlcontraception. This landmark legislation represents aserious first step in addressing the problemlaughably transparent attempt to score political points with the public by appearing to claim the moral high ground while advancing our anti-baby agenda through other means that actually will increase the number of abortions occurring early in pregnancy, and I hope you–the pro-baby patsy of this evil scheme–wi’ll join pro-choiceabortion Americans and me, the Abortion Queen, in foolishly offering your support.Let’s work together to pass this bill, and <completely insincere offer>make it the first step in a dialogue</completely insincere offer> about preventing
unintended pregnanciesunwanted babies.I eagerly await your answer despite the fact I didn’t include my address, phone number, or e-mail on this letter.
Nancy Keenan
President
NARAL Pro-Choice America
GIVE NANCY KEENAN YOUR ANSWER.
TEXT OF THE "PREVENTION FIRST" ACT. (More fisking to follow)
[Cowboy hat tip: Pajama Hadin.]
Amazing. I’m so glad that you pointed out all of her false logic. I’m finally getting around to reading “The Screwtape Letters” for the first time, and it sounds like she could be getting some help, if you know what I mean. This also reminds me of the fact the Priests for Life has been prescient and clear: you will not eliminate abortion until you eliminate contraception.
There is a universally accepted way to end unwanted pregnancies; it is called abstinance. Something tells me that NARAL wouldn’t be calling on governments and schools to increase their efforts in this area though… Or how about we call for the production of an ID for buying contraception. We ID for cigrattes so that children won’t engage in stupid, reckless behavior. Why not do it for contraception?
I don’t know NARAL’s specific position on the topic, but a lot of people on that side also favoring lowering or eliminating the age of consent. Having 22-year-old men frolicking with 16-year-old girls should really help eliminate unwanted pregnancies, right?
Jimmy Akin is the man. What a great post. Take that abortion queen!
Thank you, Jimmy. I sent my comments to NARAL. I wish I was as witty and clear-thinking as you are.
Ruthann
Your last edit is the best: “despite the fact I didn’t include my address, phone number, or e-mail on this letter.”
Yes, let’s dialogue.
Thanks for the info, Jimmy. Do you think it actually stands a chance of getting passed?
Jimmy, thank you for promoting the reality that unintended != unwanted ( != means ‘does not equal’ for us programmer types).
We really need to stomp that false logic out. It’s even worse because the way they determine unintended for the statistics is by subtracting the number of women who were TRYING to have children and became pregnant from the total number of women who became pregnant. So unintended really means not trying.
“There is a universally accepted way to end unwanted pregnancies; it is called abstinance.”
Jimmy . . . MZ said the “A” word!
Yes, it is a dirty word to pro-aborts ‘cos it denotes . . . personal responsability – something that is practically unthinkable from the point of view of the *free-sex* mentality. I’ve used this arguement before & always get the same response: I’m a Christian prude & how dare I try to impose my morality on others. And then the clam up, as if that type of statement is a decisive rebuttal.
Great post.
Feedback at NARAL has been delivered.
Message: STUFF IT!
Fisking Nancy Keegan makes baby little Jesus smile.
🙂
The New Fallacy Perpetuated by Big Abortion *TM
Jimmy Akin has a great post dissecting NARAL’s call to join pro-lifers in ending the reasons women get abortions. Needless to say, he demolishes their rhetoric and undermines the consistent abortionist claim that pro-lifers care only about the baby bef…
LOL on Jimmy’s comment about superpowers.
Hey! We could start our very own liberal online think-tank! Just start every proposition with the phrase “Wouldn’t it be nice if…” and your halfway there! Just fill in the blank.
Example: “Wouldn’t it be nice if french fries were good for you?”
Now go forth to litigate and legislate! Defeat the evil world-wide fast food conglomerate!
PRO-CHOICE DID THIS: EVIL.
WARNING: Extremely graphic photo.
I love the “Not the Enemy” picture! Just wish the poor kid weren’t sucking on a bottle of formula!