Aramaic Update

A piece back, someone was asking about what it means when Scripture says that God "hates" something.

One possibility that was raised was the idea that the term for "hate" may at times only mean "to prefer something else to," as when Jesus says that we can’t be his disciples unless we "hate" our family members.

In that passage, it’s clear that what Jesus means is that we can’t be his disciples if we prefer others to him, but it isn’t clear that that’s what the word means in this case. Jesus may be using hyperbole to make a shocking statement that is intended to provoke thought and encourage us to tease out his meaning (the way God often lets us figure things out for ourselves so that we will use the intellects he gave us and thus glorify him).

I said that I’d check with my Aramaic instructor, who is a native speaker of the langauge, and see what he had to say.

I did.

Unfortunatley, I failed to report back in a timely manner, so when I got together with him this week, it jogged my memory.

Here’s the deal:

He says that the relevant verb in Aramaic means what it does in English. "Hate" means "hate." It doesn’t mean "to prefer less than." Jesus is using the word in the shocking, hyperbolic way suggested above, and his original audience would have been as shocked and hyperboled (to make up a word) as we are when we hear the statement.

Of course, my instructor is a native speaker of contemporary Aramaic, not first century, but he does have a familiarity with classical Aramaic (which he also teaches), and my money is that he’s right on this. Jesus is being deliberately provocative with what he says (i.e., he’s trying to provoke thought).

HOLLYWOOD: Michael Moore Failed To Make Best Picture

MichaelmooreOf course, we all knew he failed to make it, but the news is that Hollywood knows it, too.

MICHAEL MOORE FAILS TO GET BEST PICTURE OSCAR NOMINATION FOR FAHRENHEIT 9/11.

Unfortunately, Hollywood also failed to nominate the picture that genuinely deserved to be named last year’s best: The Passion of the Christ.

My guess is that the failure to nominate it was partly a case of cluelessness (Hollywood is too anti-Christian to "get" the picture) and partly sour grapes ("If we have to admit F9/11 isn’t best picture material, neither will we give you the satisfaction of acknowleding that TPOTC is, either.")

SOME INTERESTING COMMENTARY ON MOORE’S FILM’S LOUSINESS (FROM A LIBERAL PERSPECTIVE) OVER AT TKS.

Quick question: What does Michael Moore’s "L" hand gesture stand for?

(a) Liberal
(b) Loser
(c) Both

I submit that the answer is the same for both the election and the Oscars.

A Quarter Mil

Quarter_milReached another hits milestone yesterday.

Since signing up with TypePad in April 2004 (the blog itself has existed since February 2004), I’ve had a quarter million hits.

Cool!

(Downside: I’m expected to bust my bandwidth allotment this month. Don’t know what they’ll do, if anything, when that happens.)

March 15, 2004 Show

LISTEN TO THE SHOW.

DOWNLOAD THE SHOW.

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • Can
    the RCIA director participate in giving blessings during the scrutinies?
  • Is the
    musical Jesus Christ Superstar
    appropriate for ten year olds?
  • If the
    thief on the cross went to heaven immediately, doesn’t that conflict with
    purgatory?
  • What
    is the difference between the Thomist and Molinist view of predestination?
  • Where
    did the word apologetics come from?
  • Are
    there secret codes in the Bible?
  • Is the
    Italian mafia a widespread problem in the church?
  • How do
    we understand what the Bible says about assurance of salvation?
  • Are
    pregnant women bound to fast on Ash Wednesday and Good Friday?
  • How
    can I find out what is and is not a liturgical abuse?

Sorry, Hil, Redstaters Aren't This Dumb

SEN. CLINTON IS ARGUING THAT WE CAN FIND COMMON GROUND ON ABORTION BY WORKING TO REDUCE THE CAUSES OF ABORTION WHILE LEAVING IT LEGAL.

No way, Jose.

I know that you have presidential ambitions, Hil, but that dog won’t hunt.

Nothing but a total ban on abortion is acceptable.

Of course, the junior senator from New York ain’t trying to win over true redstaters. She’s trying to appeal to the mushy middle.

It’s up to solid pro-lifers to educate them away from taking the bait.

Sorry, Hil, Redstaters Aren’t This Dumb

SEN. CLINTON IS ARGUING THAT WE CAN FIND COMMON GROUND ON ABORTION BY WORKING TO REDUCE THE CAUSES OF ABORTION WHILE LEAVING IT LEGAL.

No way, Jose.

I know that you have presidential ambitions, Hil, but that dog won’t hunt.

Nothing but a total ban on abortion is acceptable.

Of course, the junior senator from New York ain’t trying to win over true redstaters. She’s trying to appeal to the mushy middle.

It’s up to solid pro-lifers to educate them away from taking the bait.

LIBERALS: What, Me Worry?

In preparation for the coming push for Social Security reform, some liberals are now trying to argue that there is no "crisis" (a term that is almost infinitely plastic in meaning, as it can refer either ot an imminent crisis or a looming, long-term crisis) and that the system can be "fixed" by (guess what) tax increases and benefit reductions (not for present, voting seniors, mind you, but for us when we retire).

TIME FOR A THOMAS SOWELL SMACKDOWN!

STEYN: No Exit–And–The Problem Is That Red Staters Aren't Dumb Enough

IN THIS EDITORIAL . . .

. . . Mark Steyn argues two points:

1) All the discussion about whether we have an "exit strategy" in Iraq is misdirected, and

2) The real source of the Democrats’ rage at the redstaters is not that the redstaters are too stupid but that they aren’t stupid enough.

STEYN: No Exit–And–The Problem Is That Red Staters Aren’t Dumb Enough

IN THIS EDITORIAL . . .

. . . Mark Steyn argues two points:

1) All the discussion about whether we have an "exit strategy" in Iraq is misdirected, and

2) The real source of the Democrats’ rage at the redstaters is not that the redstaters are too stupid but that they aren’t stupid enough.