Highlights:
- Are mixed marriages considered good or bad in the Church?
- How about individuals advocating separation of church and state sitting in on religious services to catch people pushing political agendas?
- When did the chapter and verse divisions in the Bible come into use and who introduced them? Longest chapter in the Bible?
- Were James who spoke in Acts 15 and James the Apostle different people?
- Are there any historical arguments of societies which have fallen into disarray because of homosexuality?
- What happens during the Mass regarding Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross?
- Are there moral types of stem cell research?
- Who is the Apostle "whom Jesus loves" in the Gospel of John?
- Were Adam and Eve real people?
- What does it mean to consecrate your life and how is that done?
- What would be the state of a marriage done by an ex-priest?
- Is anything other than a white cloth allowed to be placed on the casket during a funeral?
- Is it immoral to benefit from a previous immoral act, e.g. stem cell lines which have already been derived?
Hmm… When President Bush allowed funding for stem-cell lines derived from human embryos that had already been killed, Catholics largely condemned this compromise as an attempt to “eat the fruit of the poisoned tree”, which would only create a tighter demand on embryonic stem-cells.
In light of the real possibility that benefitting from these lines could increase demand for more funding, thus exerting greater pressure for federal funding of future lines, it seems that taken advantage of these lines may not be 100% morally legitimate.
Has anything been stated definitively on this issue? Why settle for the fruit of the poisoned tree when we can work for fruit from a healthy one?
Is the fact that I can’t seem to download either of the past two days’ linked shows due to the fact that all your loyal readers are overloading the server?
Or is it just me?