After a long time with relatively few popes up for canonization, we’re now in an era in which there are a bunch of them (and there are some interesting theories on why that is, but that’s a subject for another day). One of these is Pius XII, who shephered the Church during WWII.
And who then was viciously slimed after the war.
Well, good for the Vatican for considering his canonization. Here’s some recent stories that have a bearing on that:
2) CARDINAL BERTONE’S SPEECH DEFENDING PIUS XII.
3) PERSPECTIVE ON CARDINAL BERTONE’S SPEECH.
4) JOHN ALLEN ARGUES THAT IT’S TIME TO BEATIFY AND CANONIZE PIUS XII.
Here’s the nut of his argument:
I’ll prescind from whether Pius XII actually merits sainthood. Instead, I want to remain in the realm of observable facts, which in this case seem to me to be the following:
- A significant block in the Catholic church, including much of its senior leadership, has a strong conviction that Pius XII is a saint and should be formally recognized as such;
- In other sectors of opinion, including much of the Jewish world, there is an equally strong conviction that Pius XII failed in his moral responsibilities during the Holocaust;
- No new evidence, or new historical perspective, is likely to alter those convictions;
- The primary force keeping this debate alive in the media, and making it a source of turbulence in Catholic-Jewish relations, is the question of possible sainthood.
Assuming those four premises are accurate, it seems to follow that there are only two ways out: Either Catholicism renounces sainthood for Pius XII, or we get it over with. Since the former is unlikely, the latter may be the best available option — and the sooner, the better. The alternative is allowing an endless cycle of point/counter-point exchanges to coarsen conversation and harden feelings.
An interesting exercise in ecclesiastical realpolitik, but if you’re in the "Pius XII should be declared a saint" camp, it goes to the issue of when it is prudent for him to be declared a saint.