A reader writes:
I have two questions.
1. What is the role of logical reasoning in Apologetics?
2. Can you please suggest an introductory book on logical reasoning?
Hrm. Question #1 is kind of general. In fact, it sounds like a homework question. You wouldn’t be taking a course in apologetics at your parish or something, would you? I’m normally hesitant to directly answer homework questions, but since I don’t know that this is one, I’ll take a crack at it. Here goes:
Logical reasoning is just another way of saying "good reasoning," the alternative being bad or illogical reasoning. (This doesn’t mean that reasoning based on emotion is bad; reason that draws on our emotions also can be good, as Mr. Spock eventually learned.)
Logic is important to every field of study, apologetics included. In fact, since apologetics deals with defending a position against contrary claims and arguments, the role of logic is perhaps brought into sharper focus in apologetics.
Basically, there are two kinds of logic, known as informal logic and symbolic logic. The former involves the analysis of ordinary language arguments, the latter recasts arguments in a "mathematical" form for purposes of analyzing their structure more closely. Both have a role to play in apologetics. Informal logic is useful in the kind of ordinary, conversational apologetics that most in the field are engaged in. Symbolic logic is useful for the higher-end, technical apologetics that is possible (e.g., among philosophers).
Though logic is important to apologetics, but it has limits. There still must be room for grace and free will. Thus Vatican I infallibly rejected the proposition that "the assent to Christian faith is not free, but is necessarily produced by arguments of human reason; or that the grace of God is necessary only for living faith which works by charity" (Dei filius canon 3:5). Logic can only take one so far, but ultimately it has to be free will enabled by God’s grace that allows one to embrace the Christian faith.
Regarding question #2, I’m only going to recommend stuff dealing with informal logic. If you’re just starting out, you don’t want to try to self-teach symbolic logic. It’s too complicated for that. Here are some resources:
- Back when I was a philosophy undergrad, I first took a logic course that used an edition of Irving Copi’s Introduction to Logic. It’s very good, which is why it’s been in print for so long and been through so many editions (currently in its 11th). But it is a college textbook, so it is way expensive. It also may be more technical than what you’re looking for, so here are some more resources that look like good possibilities.
- A Rulebook for Arguments by Anthony Weston.
- Thinking from A to Z by Nigel Warburton.
- An Introduction to Reasoning by Allan Janik, et al.
- Informal Logic: A Handbook for Critical Argument by Douglas Walton.