The Race To Save A Baby’s Life

A reader writes:

I don’t know if you’ve seen this bouncing around the blogosphere, but a friend’s brother was featured on USA Today when his 26-yr-old pregnant wife died and he decided to try to keep her alive long enough to give birth.  They’re almost there, but the cost is prohibitive.  If you don’t mind blogging about it, the USA Today story is here:

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-06-15-saving-baby-cover_x.htm

Video of Jason is here: 

http://www.usatoday.com/news/graphics/susansbaby/flash.htm

My blog on it is here: 

http://www.theologyofthebody.info/#111893288981521347

And the website to donate is

www.susantorresfund.org

Absolutely, I’d be happy to blog on the subject. I encourage folks to check out the above links. The story is heartbreaking, but there is real hope.

Pardon My Dutch?

I have no idea whatsoever how to cuss in Dutch, but apparently Dutch people do.

And it doesn’t sit well with some of them.

Yes, despite the extreme moral turpitude into which the Netherlands as a whole has descended, there are still folks over there who are swimming against the Eurotide.

Take, for example, the folks of the village Staphorst.

EXCERPTS:

The name of the Lord may no longer be taken in vain in the Dutch village of Staphorst.

Staphorst, in the so-called Dutch "bible belt" of eastern towns where religion holds sway, approved a ban on swearing by 13-4 council votes

Now, you may be wondering how such a village is even allowed to pass a law like that. Shouldn’t the central Dutch government–if not the central Eurogovernment–have made profaning the name of God a constitutional right?

Indeed it has, and so there are "enforcement issues" with the Staphorst law. Still, it’s nice to know that there are some over yonder who still rage against the dying of the light.

GET THE STORY.

Deep Throat

DeepthroatthenY’know, I was just talking about how they got information in All The President’s Men.

One way I didn’t mention in that post was how Woodward got info from the source dubbed "Deep Throat."

Now come to find out that they’ve up and revealed who Deep Throat was/is.

YEE-HAW!

I love a real-life mystery, and I’ve been fascinated by who Deep Throat was for years. I read John Dean’s e-book trying to crack the mystery, and I’ve ready I don’t know how many articles on it.

Turns out he was a former #2 guy at the FBI named W. Mark Felt (above). That explains how he had the dirt he did: The FBI was investigating the Watergate break-in, and Felt had access to the info that the investigation was turning up. He then used that info to carefully help steer Woodward in the right direction.

At the behest of his family Felt, now 91, finally spilled the beans in A VANITY FAIR ARTICLE.

When I first encounted the claim in press reports yesterday, I was a bit hinky as the same accounts quoted Carl Bernstein (Woodward’s former partner and one of three people other than Throat himself to know Throat’s identity) refused to confirm that Felt was Throat, saying that the existing deal with Throat would be honored and his identity wouldn’t be revealed until his death.

This set off alarm bells for me that the identification might be fake, since Woodward has said that Throat’s identity would be revealed if Throat altered the terms of the agreement and allowed it to be known earlier.

Bernstein might have been simply playing for time, though, not wanting to confirm it on his own without consulting Woodward, who was the real contact for Deep Throat.

Or Bernstein might have been fearful that Felt was being pressured to do this by his family and was not now, at 91, in a proper frame of mind to make a fully free decision in the matter.

However that may be, late in the day yesterday Woodward, Bernstein, and Ben Bradley (the third person known to know Deep Throat’s identity) CONFIRMED THAT W. MARK FELT WAS INDEED DEEP THROAT.

Bradlee, who apparently cusses as much as Jason Robards does when portraying him in All The President’s Men, said: "The thing that stuns me is that the goddamn secret has lasted this long."

While the secret lasted, it wasn’t as if nobody had speculated that Felt was Deep Throat. Reportedly, he was the person Richard Nixon most suspected. Others suspected, too. And there was a brush of suspicion a while back when it was revealed that Bernstein’s son had blurted out the identification to a friend at summer camp. (Bernstein’s then-wife tried to smooth this over by claiming that the boy had just hear he "speculating" about Deep Throat’s identity.)

While I’m pleased that we now finally know Deep Throat’s identity–and that all those who claimed that there was no Deep Throat or that the character was a composite of different sources, despite vigorous denials by Woodward and company, have been shown wrong–I must confess that I’m a little disappointed.

I look forward to learning more about Felt, but I’d always secretly harbored a kind of hope that Deep Throat would be revealed to be someone with a more prominent public profile. For example, there was considerable speculation that Pat Buchannan was Deep Throat, and I always found this an intriguing suggestion. Buchannan is such a maverick that you could easily imagine him turning on Nixon if he felt his principles required it of him. A large number of other "high-name" guesses were also made for who Deep Throat was.

I think I was attracted to such suggestions simply because I knew the names of certain people being touted as possible Deep Throats. I didn’t turn as much attention to the theories that held Deep Throat was in the FBI or the CIA because, frankly, these people weren’t as famous and I didn’t know them, so it was less intriguing to think that they might be Deep Throat. I thus tended to hurry through analyses pointing to such individuals as possible candidates.

But all’s well that ends well, and we now know who Deep Throat was.

Though I’ll always harbor a suspicion that Deep Throat was really . . .  Hal Holbrook!

MORE ON DEEP THROAT.

AND MORE.

Will On The European Constitution

I’ve said it before: EUROPE NEEDS TO REJECT THE CONSTITUTION IT’S NOW CONSIDERING.

GEORGE WILL ECHOES THE SAME, WITH PARTICULARS ABOUT SOME OF THE NUTTINESS THAT WOULD BE ENSHRINED IN THE CONSTITUTION.

UPDATE: My apologies for the lack of the link to the George Will piece! Didn’t realize it wasn’t there. Let’s hope the French vote totally derails this constitution. As Will makes clear, it’s got a lot of really nutty stuff in it.

A-Ha!

Y’all may remember that a piece back I was complaining about some really Evil web advertising by the ringtone company Jamster, which has been under investigation for its marketing practices.

The advertising featured what I described at the time as "a repulsive and depraved looking photo-art fishman (with a figleaf over
his genitals and a pair of aviators’ goggles) who zoomed jerkily and
frenetically back and forth across the ad space in a nauseating fashion."

I never visited Jamster’s page–even to complain–but I recently turned up information on what the evil fish character is all about. It turns out that the character was not created by Jamster but buy some Swedish guy, and it (the character, not the guy so far as I know) is named "The Annoying Thing." (Big surprise.)

It was inspired by a popular sound on the Internet by another Swede imitating the noise made by a particular kind of moped engine.

The evil Jamster then licensed The Annoying Thing as an advertising mascot and used the sound as the basis for a ringtone.

The ringtone is called Crazy Frog (warning: some crude content), and it has been extensively marketed in the UK, causing folks there excruciating anguish.

Now there is a music single out based on the ringtone called "Crazy Frog Axel F," which is set to go number 1 on the British charts.

People are acting all surprised about this–"How could a ringtone get to the top of the charts?" they are wondering–but it’s not much of a mystery when one listens to the thing and realizes that despite the presence of a sputtering Swede in it, "Crazy Frog Axel F" is really just a remix of "Axel F," the smash-hit themesong to the 1984 movie Beverly Hills Cop (about a guy named Axel Foley, you may recall).

LISTEN HERE IF YOU NEED A REFRESHER ON WHAT AXEL F SOUNDS LIKE: WMP | REAL

Since virtually none of the young people driving the British music charts today were alive in 1984 (and even fewer capable of remembering Beverly Hills Cop), it is hardly surprising that one of the biggest songs of the day could be brought back, introduced to the new audience, and do well on the radio.

What we really have here is the Crazy Frog sound hijacking an existing popular song. If you just played the engine-sputtering Swede on the radio, it wouldn’t do nearly as well. It’s because a well-written song has been infested with the Crazy Frog sound that it’s able to get that far.

And of course that’s even assuming the British charts are honest and the whole thing isn’t just a publicity stunt cooked up by evil executives at Jamster in league with evil chart cookers and the Easter Bunny (and the Annoying Thing).

Leslie Burke

A guestblogger from over The Pond writes:

I would like to bring to your attention the case of Leslie Burke, a Brit who is fighting for the right to live.  Mr. Burke has a degenerative brain disorder and knows that in the future he will be incapacitated to such an extent that he will be unable to request the basic neccessities to maintain his life, ie; food and water….I wonder if you would be interested in blogging about this as my humble blog doesn’t get too many visits and I would like for people to witness this marvellously positive public hail for recognition of the value of even a ‘suffering’ and incapacitated life…particularly in light of the tragedy of Terri Schiavo’s murder.

To read more about the case for Leslie Burke;


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4551265.stm

No prob! I hope folks will read more about Mr. Burke’s case, and I hope he fares better than Terri did.

I also invite folks to STOP BY YOUR BLOG.

LEFTIST TO LEFT: I’m Leaving You

SanFran Chronicle columnist Keith Thompson writes (EXCERPTS):

I walk away from a long-term
intimate relationship. I’m separating not from a person but a cause: the
political philosophy that for more than three decades has shaped my character
and consciousness, my sense of self and community, even my sense of cosmos.

I’m leaving the left  —  more precisely, the American cultural left and
what it has become during our time together.

My estrangement hasn’t happened overnight. Out of the corner of my eye I
watched what was coming for more than three decades, yet refused to truly see.
Now it’s all too obvious.

Like many others who came of age politically in the 1960s, I became adept
at not taking the measure of the left’s mounting incoherence. To face it
directly posed the danger that I would have to describe it accurately, first
to myself and then to others.

GET THE STORY.

LEFTIST TO LEFT: I'm Leaving You

SanFran Chronicle columnist Keith Thompson writes (EXCERPTS):

I walk away from a long-term

intimate relationship. I’m separating not from a person but a cause: the

political philosophy that for more than three decades has shaped my character

and consciousness, my sense of self and community, even my sense of cosmos.

I’m leaving the left  —  more precisely, the American cultural left and

what it has become during our time together.

My estrangement hasn’t happened overnight. Out of the corner of my eye I

watched what was coming for more than three decades, yet refused to truly see.

Now it’s all too obvious.

Like many others who came of age politically in the 1960s, I became adept

at not taking the measure of the left’s mounting incoherence. To face it

directly posed the danger that I would have to describe it accurately, first

to myself and then to others.

GET THE STORY.