Category: Culture
FRINGE Fans! You Can Own Walter’s Favorite Music!
In episode 2.10 ("Grey Matters"), Walter asks Astrid to drive him back to the lab so he can hear an album by a band called Violet Sedan Chair (he says listening to it helps him come down from being high on Valium).
In episode 2.21 ("Northwest Passage"), Walter picks up the album–Seven Suns–as pictured here. We also get to hear part of one of the songs ("She's Doing Alright").
In episode 2.23 ("Over There, Part 2"), there is a deleted scene where Peter and Walternate are driving in a car and listening to another song from the album ("Hovercraft Mother"). They also discuss the meaning of the band's music in Peter's life and how the band is different in the alternate universe. Here's the scene:
In episode 3.10 ("The Firefly"), we meet Roscoe Joyce, the keyboardist and songwriter for Violet Sedan Chair.
Now let's put on our grey business suits and fedoras, shave off our hair and eyebrows, flash over to our universe (the real one), and go back in time to Observe an event occurring in April, 2009.
In this event, J.J. Abrams, creator of FRINGE, is guest-editing an issue of Wired magazine. One of the pieces in it is called Musical Mystery Tour: Messages Embedded in Your Favorite Album. It has a timeline of different albums with messages (easter eggs) embedded in them. One item in the timeline is this:
1971 The liner notes on Violet Sedan Chair's album Seven Suns list a missing 11th song, and the penultimate track is rumored to produce hallucinatory effects when played on multiple turntables.
The eleventh song on Seven Suns (according to the back cover of the album, same as held up by Walter in the picture, but here is a clearer version) is titled "Greenmana." The penultimate (next to last) track is titled "Re Fa Mi Si Sol La."
If you look on the album's back cover, you'll also see a circle with part of a piano keyboard in it, only it has an extra black key. This is the logo of Seven Suns' record company, 13th Tone Records.
On April 14, 2009, just few days after the Abrams issue of Wired came out, 13th Tone Records was trademarked.
Now let's flash forward in time to Observe an event in a record store in Seattle in early 2011. A human being named Kiki Kane makes a purchase. It is a copy of Seven Suns, published by 13th Tone in 1971. Like any record that old, it is worn and beaten.
Word spreads on the Internet that copies of Seven Suns are turning up in record stores around America. Some, after they are discovered, are sold on eBay.
FRINGE fans frantically search record stores for more copies.
HERE'S AN INTERESTING ACCOUNT BY A RECORD STORE EMPLOYEE.
Of course, the number of the vinyl records seeded in independent record stores is nowhere near enough to meet fan demand. Fortunately, you can now purchase your very own copy of Seven Suns in .mp3.
Rumor has it that there are buried clues in the album that relate to what's going to happen on the show. Maybe. If so, they aren't obvious in advance, so you don't have to worry about spoilers. (I have theories on which lyrics may be clues, but I'll save that for another time.) The album is thus safe for people who haven't yet seen season 3 (or 1 or 2 for that matter).
One word about the band's name. "Violet Sedan Chair" may sound more weird to our ears than it is. We typically think of a sedan and a chair as two different things. To us, a sedan is a type of car and a chair is … well … a chair. But this isn't just an arbitrary juxtaposition of nouns.
Historically a sedan chair (also just called a sedan) is what we sometimes think of as a litter–the kind of chair fancy people used to be carried around in so they wouldn't have to walk. Y'know, like this:
Those things used to be big business before taxis were invented, and they're where we get the name for the type of car.
So a violet sedan chair is just a violet one of those.
"Violet Sedan Chair" is also an anagram of "Olive Can Read This."
In any event, as said, you can now own Walter's favorite music. The songs are actually pretty authentic in terms of period sound (and subject matter), the tunes are catchy, and their lyrics are awesome in a cheesy way.
My favorites are "Hovercraft Mother," "She's Doing Fine," "500 Years," and "Last Man In Space."
What are yours?
Olivia. In the Lab. With the Pyrokinesis.
Here's a little Fringe speculation. For those who have not seen any of Season 3, waiting for it to come out on DVD/BlueRay, don't worry. This post won't spoil anything. It's just my putting together a few pieces from Seasons 1 and 2 and guessing at something that may be revealed at some point in the future.
So here goes . . .
When we first meet Walter Bishop in the Pilot, he has been institutionalized since 1991. Olivia Dunham explains:
An assistant was killed in his lab. Rumors about Dr. Bishop using humans as guinea pigs. He was charged with manslaughter, but was deemed mentally unfit to stand trial.
We later learn more about both the charges Olivia mentions, the assistant who was killed in the lab and the experiments on humans.
In episode 1.12, The No-Brainer (the one where hands come out of computer screens and grab people's heads) a woman named Jessica Warren starts trying to see Walter. She first approaches Peter, who turns her away. After which Olivia says:
I think I know who that woman was… outside.
PETER: What do you think you know?
OLIVIA: That she's the mother of the lab assistant… that was killed in the fire here almost twenty years ago. It's none of my business.
When Jessica Warren finally gets to meet Walter, we learn:
My daughter's name was Carla Warren.
WALTER: Oh,dear.
JESSICA WARREN: Do you remember her?
WALTER: Yes.
JESSICA WARREN: I want to see you because… you were the last person to see my daughter alive, and…I've always wanted to ask… Was there anything else I could know? Anything,anything else…you could tell me about my daughter.
WALTER: She was… a wonderful girl. What I remember… is her smile. She had a wonderful smile.
WALTER: I miss Carla.
JESSICA WARREN: Me,too. I miss her.
(Walter embraces Jessica Warren.)
Okay, so the assistant's name was Carla Warren and she died in a fire in the lab and Walter was there when it happened (something we could probably have inferred from his being charged with manslaughter, anyway).
Now about fires in labs on Fringe.
In episode 1.17, Bad Dreams (the one where Olivia meets a fellow Cortexiphan kid who mentally forces people to stand along the edge of a building's roof with him, with the threat of making them jump), we get the following exchange:
WALTER: Where’s the fire? I always loved that expression, which is curious, since my lab assistant was killed in a fire.
OLIVIA: What can you tell me about Cortexiphan?
WALTER: Oh, that takes me back. I remember 'Belly' whipping up a peyote mash–
OLIVIA: Walter!
WALTER: Cortexiphan was a highly experimental drug. William theorized that it might enhance certain abilities in predisposed children.
PETER: Let me guess– you experimented on people.
WALTER: Oh, no, no. not me. William. We had quite a disagreement about it.
OLIVIA: What abilities?
WALTER: It worked on perception. Carlos Castaneda, Aldus Huxley, Werner Heisenberg, all focused on one single elementary truth. Perception is the key to transformation.
PETER: Reality is both subjective and malleable. If you can dream a better world, you can make a better world.
WALTER: Or perhaps travel between them.
PETER: What did you just say?
OLIVIA: So if Nick Lane was treated with Cortexiphan, he could change reality with his thoughts. He could make somebody do something just by thinking it.
WALTER: Not his thoughts. It’s how you feel that determines your view of the world.
OLIVIA: You’re saying that Cortexiphan worked on feelings.
WALTER: That’s reductive, but essentially, yes.
Olivia then figures out that she also was subjected to a Cortexiphan trial. At the end of the episode:
(rummaging through a storage box, Walter finds some old cassette tapes and starts watching one. haunted by what he sees and hears – a small blonde child sits huddled on the floor while voices dialogue from off the screen)
WILLIAM BELL: Is the incident contained?
FEMALE VOICE: Yes, Doctor Bell.
WILLIAM BELL: How bad?
FEMALE VOICE: Bad.
WILLIAM BELL: Casualties?
FEMALE VOICE: Not sure yet. We can't locate Brenner.
WILLIAM BELL: Is SHE okay?
FEMALE VOICE: SHE is fine.
WILLIAM BELL: Hell, do we know what triggered it?
WALTER: Obviously she was upset, William. (to the child) It's okay. It's alright now. Nobody is angry with you. You didn't do anything bad. It's alright Olive… everythings going to be okay.
(Walter sits silently, alone in the dark lab and stares at the screen)
The transcript doesn't say it, but Olive (Olivia) is huddled in a small, unburned corner of a room which has apparently been subjected to intense fire as part of the "incident" William Bell refers to.
This is confirmed in episode 2.15, Jacksonville (the one where Olivia revisits the day care center where she was experimented upon), where Olivia gets to watch the same video tape and recognizes herself:
OLIVIA: That's me. What happened?
WALTER: This was the first time you saw the other side. You were frightened. Started a fire with your mind. It should have worked. This is the very sort of thing that William and I were preparing for.
Olivia also indicates that she has no memory of the Jacksonville experiments:
I have a freakishly good memory. I remember everything. But not this. There's just nothing that's familiar.
PETER: Maybe that's a good thing.
And earlier in the ep, Walter also commented on her not remembering her Cortexiphan-produced abilities:
OLIVIA: Walter, when did I see things from the other side?
WALTER: Twenty-six years ago when you were a little girl. The Cortexiphan Trials. As I've said, the drug worked on perception. Of the thirty children that William Bell and I experimented on, you were the first with the ability to identify things from the other side. We gave you the ability.
PETER: Walter, you were conducting illegal drug trials on children. Don't make that sound like charity work.
OLIVIA: Was it me who described it as a glimmer? Well, I can't see it anymore.
WALTER: Because I believe you stopped wanting to. When you did, there were consequences, but I was able to elicit the ability once. I believe I may be able to do it again.
So Walter's lab assistant, Carla Warren, died in 1991 in a laboratory fire and Walter was there.
Olivia, who would have been around 12 in 1991, was given Cortexiphan as a child and, among other things, occasionally started fires with her mind (pyrokinesis) when frightened or upset. However, there were "consequences" to her use of the Coretexiphan abilities, and she decided she didn't want them any more–and today has no memory of the experiments.
What's the dramatically obvious way to connect these facts up?
The very next episode, 2.16, Peter, is the one in which we get a flashback to 1985, when Peter was a boy–and we get to meet Carla Warren for the first time, six years before her death in the lab fire.
My guess is that, at some point in the future, we will have a flashback episode to 1991, when Olive is 12, and the experiments have been relocated from Jacksonville, Florida to Harvard, where the lab fire occurred.
Something momentous will be at stake (very possibly with Observer involvement). Walter and Olive and Carla will be in the lab. Something horrible will happen, pushing Olive over the edge and triggering her pyrokinetic abilities. Carla (who was likely trying to stop Walter from doing something, possibly to Olive) will die.
Olivia and Walter live, but both will be shattered. Olive will either repress all memory of the Cortexiphan trials or someone (possibly William Bell) will cause them to go dormant.
Walter will have either just had William Bell perform the operation to remove bits from his brain or he will have it immediately after this event, as it is what frightened him of what he was becoming.
In any event, the aftermath of the event will find him mentally and emotionally shattered and he will be committed to St. Claire's for the next 17 years.
Until Olivia Dunhman walks into St. Claire's and recruits him to help solve the case in the Pilot episode.
Now, there are other ways this could work. Other Cortexiphan kids have been shown to have pyrokinesis, but c'mon! This is the obvious, dramatically satisfying way to do it.
How did Carla Warren die?
My money is that it was Olivia. In the lab. With the pyrokinesis.
Civil Rights Breakthrough!
I'm working on getting The Fathers Know Best available on Nook.
As a test, I uploaded this short story for Nook (the same one I used to test the software for Kindle).
If you'd like to test things on your end, feel free to download it! It's only 99 cents.
BTW, the story was reviewed on Amazon by the Curt Jester and given four stars. (Thanks, Jeff!)
Also BTW, thanks to SDG for help upgrading the cover image!
VIDEO: What Anti-Pope Is also a Saint?
Pope Benedict’s “SHOCKING” Statement on the Jews!
The long-awaited second volume of Pope Benedict’s work Jesus of Nazareth is about to come out. (You can pre-order it here!).
This was the book he had started before his election to the papacy and which, in spite of the burdens of his office, he determined to press on with.
Because he’s now pope, the book is attracting vastly more attention than if he had become a private theologian at the end of John Paul II’s reign, and as with everything pope—the press is determined to make the most of it, even when they don’t have the facts quite right.
The book isn’t even out yet, but based on excerpts that have already been released, the press is already having a field day.
For once, however, they at least seem to be using their powers of exaggeration and sensationalism on the side of good.
The message they’re getting out is that in the book Pope Benedict says that the Jewish people cannot be blamed for the death of Christ.
In other words, they are not to be charged with the blood libel of being “Christ-killers”—as they have so often and unfairly labeled by anti-Semites.
So that’s good that the press is getting the word out about that! Like I said: Press using its powers for good (for once) in a religion story. Huzzah! Or, as they say in Hebrew, Mazal Tov!
But it being, y’know, the press, they’re not likely to dot all their i’s and cross all their t’s.
For example, you probably won’t get from many stories the fact that this book is not an act of the pope’s magisterium. It’s not an official Church document. In fact, in the introduction to volume 1 of the series, Pope Benedict expressly made this point and even went so far as to say explicitly that:
“This work is not an absolute act of magisterial teaching, but merely an expression of my personal research into the face of the Lord. Therefore, everyone is free to contradict me.”
This is why I love, love, love Pope Benedict. He is a man of enormous humility and, despite the fact that he is the one person on earth able to speak with divine infallibility on his own (as opposed to in concert with other bishops), he wants to make absolutely clear to the public what is his own opinion versus what is Church teaching, and to expressly give permission to people to contradict him on the former.
Wow!
Gotta love this man! That is intellectual humility.
The fact that most press stories won’t cover this is a minor matter, though. Another relatively minor matter, though perhaps a somewhat weightier one, is that most press stories also won’t make it clear that this isn’t exactly news.
Certainly, it is news-worthy, and I’m glad they’re covering it. But there is a danger that some stories might leave people with the impression that this is a new development. It’s not. For example, back in 1965 the Second Vatican Council stated that:
True, the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ; still, what happened in His passion cannot be charged against all the Jews, without distinction, then alive, nor against the Jews of today. Although the Church is the new people of God, the Jews should not be presented as rejected or accursed by God, as if this followed from the Holy Scriptures. All should see to it, then, that in catechetical work or in the preaching of the word of God they do not teach anything that does not conform to the truth of the Gospel and the spirit of Christ.
Furthermore, in her rejection of every persecution against any man, the Church, mindful of the patrimony she shares with the Jews and moved not by political reasons but by the Gospel’s spiritual love, decries hatred, persecutions, displays of anti-Semitism, directed against Jews at any time and by anyone [Nostra Aetate 4].
Unlike Pope Benedict’s statement in his book, this is a declaration by an ecumenical council, it is a statement on the part of the Church’s magisterium, and one with great weight.
In fact, in the excerpts released thus far Pope Benedict doesn’t quite say what the press is making him out as saying, though he certainly agrees with the idea. (He certainly agrees with the statement from Nostra Aetate, and the idea it expresses lurks behind what he does say, which I’ll get into in my next post.)
Still, given the real existence of anti-Semitism in the world and its historical linkage to Christianity—and given some of the tensions that have occurred with the Jewish community during Pope Benedict’s reign—it is always good to have an occasion in the press to remind people of the fact that the Jewish people cannot be slimed as Christ-killers the way they have been in the past—and that the Church fundamentally rejects this characterization.
So for now we can rejoice that a positive message is being sent for once, even if some i’s are dotless and t’s are crossless.
To borrow a line from Chesterton, anything worth doing is worth doing badly.
Sending the message that the Jewish people cannot be slimed as Christ-killers is a message worth sending!
What do you think?
Oh, and GET THE BOOK!
Don’t Forget to Vote!
VIDEO: What Church Manual Dates from the Time of the Apostles?
Texting on Middle Earth
The Fathers Know Best Finalist for Readers’ Choice Awards
The Fathers Know Best has been nominated for the 2011 About.com Catholicism Readers' Choice Awards.
I hope that you will consider casting a vote for it–and for the other Catholic Answers projects that have been nominated for awards. These include:
- Catholic.com for best Catholic web site 2010.
- Catholic Answers LIVE for best Catholic podcast 2010.
- This Rock for best Catholic magazine 2010.
- Catholic Answers Fan Page for best Catholic Facebook page 2010.
We at Catholic Answers work very hard to make these projects succeed and provide apostolic benefit for as many souls as possible.
Winning any of these awards will help us better promote them and allow us to reach even more souls.
You can cast your vote here:
Voting is only open for a limited time, and the results will be announced soon.
Please consider casting a vote today, and thank you for your support!
–Jimmy