SDG IN DC #1: The Great Elevator Escape

SDG here (not Jimmy) with a follow-up to the SDG Mystery Photo post.

As many readers correctly guessed/stated, the picture shows the Greydanus family standing in the White House Rose Garden, on the West Wing side.

Some readers may remember my mentioning in a combox awhile back that Suz and I are sort of related to someone who works on the President’s staff. A few months back we took off for a week for a four-day trip to DC, and we got a super-cool White House tour that included the West Wing.

I hope to post something on the White House visit next week — though it wasn’t the best story to come out of our DC trip, and that’s what this post is about.

I think I can safely say that what our four older kids will probably most remember of our DC trip is our dramatic escape from a stalled elevator at the Smithsonian Institution Air & Space Museum, which involved an access panel in the roof of the elevator, two ladders, and a climb through the elevator shaft.

Here’s how it happened. (Note: Photos below the fold! Click to see larger version!)

Continue reading “SDG IN DC #1: The Great Elevator Escape”

SDG Mystery Photo

SDG here (not Jimmy!), making an almost unheard-of foray from guest-blogging retirement limbo with a quasi-mystery photo.


Where am I and the rest of the Greydanus clan in this picture? (See bigger picture.)

I say it’s a quasi-mystery photo because some of Jimmy’s faithful readers (Esau, I’m talking to you!) may remember my mentioning the occasion of this photo awhile back.

If you know where we are because you remember my mentioning the occasion, don’t spoil it for other guessers right away.

If you know where we are because you recognize the location, post away.

This week I really mean to post on this occasion, and a related episode that’s actually a better story. Stay tuned.

DUH-O-GRAM to Rudy

SDG here (not Jimmy) with a DUH-O-GRAM for Republican White House hopeful Rudy Giuliani, whose increasingly blunt dissing of pro-lifers is making it harder and harder for morally sane voters to contemplate holding their nose and focusing on the promise of originalist Supreme Court nominees over Rudy’s actual rhetoric on baby-killing.

From the Des Moines Register:

Republican presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani warned GOP activists in Des Moines on Saturday that if they insist on a nominee who always agrees with them, it will spell defeat in 2008.

“Our party is going to grow, and we are going to win in 2008 if we are a party characterized by what we’re for, not if we’re a party that’s known for what we’re against,” the former New York mayor said at a midday campaign stop.

Republicans can win, he said, if they nominate a candidate committed to the fight against terrorism and high taxes, rather than a pure social conservative.

“Our party has to get beyond issues like that,” Giuliani said, a reference to abortion rights, which he supports.

Oh, the irony.

First Rudy spouts this line about being “a party characterized by what we’re for” rather than “a party that’s known for what we’re against.”

DUH-O-GRAM to Rudy: Being PRO-life is being for something, not just against something. It’s called the right to life — you know, one of those “inalienable rights” mentioned at the top of the Declaration of Independence. It has implications well beyond abortion (euthanasia, clone and kill, and embryonic harvesting to name a few).

But that’s not all! What’s Rudy’s grand vision for a positive party agenda? What does he want his party to be known as the party for, rather than against? Let’s hear it again:

“Republicans can win, he said, if they nominate a candidate committed to the fight against terrorism and high taxes, rather than a pure social conservative.”

Why, Rudy, do you really want your party to be known as the party against terrorism and high taxes? Isn’t that kind of, you know, negative? What has that got to do with what you’re for?

At least you’ve got to appreciate a politician who isn’t afraid to come right out and say what he really thinks, regardless what anyone thinks. It certainly does clarify matters. Rudy’s supporters have always admired his penchant for blunt talk, and he certainly isn’t losing his edge as he moves onto the national stage.

Caveat: In fairness, it must be noted that the last sentence quoted above is not a direct quotation from Giuliani but the reporter’s paraphrase. Whether Rudy actually advanced “the fight against terrorism and high taxes” as the real agenda over “issues like” abortion depends on the accuracy of the paraphrase.

Either way, though, it seems clear that for Rudy the defense of the unborn isn’t just a side issue — it’s a veritable thorn in the side of the Republican party. He doesn’t just want to focus on other issues, he wants to push this plank off the platform.

This raises one of the most salient points from a recent editorial called “NO DEAL, RUDY” that ran in my newspaper, the NATIONAL CATHOLIC REGISTER:

If pro-lifers went along [with Rudy], we’d soon find out that a pro-abortion Republican president would no longer preside over a pro-life party. The power a president exerts over his party’s character is nearly absolute. The party is changed in his image. He picks those who run it and, both directly and indirectly, those who enter it.

Thus, the Republicans in the 1980s became Reaganites. The Democrats in the 1990s took on the pragmatic Clintonite mold. Bush’s GOP is no different, as Ross Douthat points out in “It’s His Party” in the March Atlantic Monthly.

A Republican Party led by a pro-abortion politician would become a pro-abortion party.

READ MORE.

German study: NFP as effective as the Pill

SDG here (not Jimmy) with a (slanted) story from Scientific American that nevertheless offers some encouraging evidence regarding acceptance of the effectiveness of natural family planning among secular researchers.

Here’s their (slanted) headline:

Modified Rhythm Method Shown to Be as Effective as the Pill—But Who Has That Kind of Self-Control?

The slant is also evident through the story, from the "Vatican roulette" reference in the lede (opening paragraph) to one researcher’s disparaging remarks about the term "natural family planning":

"For many couples this is highly unnatural. ‘Natural’ is methods that you don’t have to think about, that allow you to be spontaneous…"

Sorry, but there’s nothing "natural" about latex barriers (which you certainly do "have to think about") or barrages of hormones specifically designed to short-circuit the natural functioning of a major bodily system (which you ought to be thinking about).

NFP, meanwhile, is entirely "natural" in the most meaningful and relevant sense: It accords with natural law, with the truth about human nature. It may or may not come “naturally” to couples raised in a sex-obsessed immediate-gratification contraceptive culture, but then neither do things like fidelity and lifelong commitment. Unsurprisingly, couples who do have "that kind of self-control" also turn out to be a lot better than their contracepting peers at the latter things too.

GET THE (SLANTED) STORY.

Allison’s New Heart

Acey My niece, Allison, has a new heart, as of last Tuesday! Many thanks to all for your prayers. Just for grins, I have posted a picture of her, pre-transplant, with Ace Young, from last season’s American Idol show. He came by Denver Children’s Hospital just to see her. Nice guy.

Since I posted a link to Allison’s Web Page previously, I have refrained from posting on her progress for a couple of reasons;

1) The news of her recovery changes daily, and I only want to hit highlights as they come. I am by nature optimistic, and didn’t want to post about every little bump in the road.

2) I didn’t want events in my personal life to even BEGIN to dominate Jimmy’s blog, even in the short term.

In short, Allison is doing well. The surgery itself went as well as could be expected. Such procedures now take between 6-8 hours, and her’s was typical. there was scar tissue to deal with, and for that reason there was some increased post-operative bleeding that was not unexpected. One significant fact; Allison’s blood oxygen levels, post-op, have been normal for the first time in her life! So her new heart is doing it’s thing.

There have been some additional issues, but overall, Allison is recovering nicely. If you would like to keep up with her day-to-day progress, her webpage is updated fairly often by my brother, the radio genius. He’s not only a great husband and father, but he can build a radio station for you from the ground up, and in addition is the best DJ and sports announcer I have ever heard.

Praise God for his healing mercy.

A Pound of Flesh

Whatever happened to making license plates? In a scenario that seems to take the Chinese model as an inspiration,

Apparently, South Carolina is considering allowing prisoners to trade body parts for time off their sentences.

Being that the political and ethical problems with this are smell-able from a couple of furlongs, the only question in my mind is how an idea this grisly and morally tone-deaf could get this far along. Who the heck thought this is a good idea? I’m speaking as someone who’s niece underwent a heart transplant yesterday!

"Mary Jo Cagle, chief medical officer of Bon Secours St. Francis Health
System in Greenville, urged senators to find an allowable incentive.
"We have a huge need for organs and bone marrow," Cagle said."

Oh. I see. Well, that makes it okay, then. It’s a market-driven thing, I guess. To be fair, the legislative committee that has worked on the proposal is not sold on the idea of an incentive program to encourage inmates to cut their incarceration by donating organs or tissue. They are not even sure it’s legal (obviously some outdated legal aberration, like in Hartford, Connecticut, where it’s illegal to kiss your wife on Sunday).

In an advanced society such as ours, we understand that it is WRONG to ask an inmate to trade his/her very flesh for a reduced prison sentence (this could give a whole new dimension to the Plea Bargain), or to be so crass as to just write a check for someone’s internal organs. We prefer to steal valuable tissue from anonymous, microscopic people. Far fewer entanglements.

GET THE STORY.

Allison Update

Tim Jones, here. My niece, Allison, about whom I posted recently, has just headed into surgery to receive a heart transplant.

Your prayers are coveted by her family.

This news will not be reflected on her web page for some time, probably, but here it is for those who might like to find out a little more about her.

ALLISON’S PAGE

Humble thanks to all in advance.

Flying Family Fun

Flsquirrel Hey, Tim Jones, here. I have said before that our family has a thing for aviation, but this post isn’t about that kind of flying. This post concerns the flying squirrel, at left.

A little background; We have animals. As of this past Christmas, we have a domestic mammal to human ratio of exactly 1:1. Living with, and sponging off the four of us, we have 2 cats and 2 dogs. The dogs don’t really come into this story.

Our latest arrival is my daughter’s prim, slender and graceful grey tabby. Being new, she has been kept mostly inside. Our other cat, Ozzie (named for the character Ozymandias, of the Tripods trilogy) is an outdoor veteran, and comes and goes as he pleases. He’s also huge. This Maine Coon cat has actually been mistaken for a real racoon on more than one occasion. One thing I like about him is that he doesn’t seem to need us, but hangs around, anyway. I figure he must like us.

He likes us so much, in fact, that he sometimes brings us "presents". He most often leaves these presents on the front doorstep, and they are most often dead.

Most often.

Occasionally, they are "only mostly dead", and rarely (when he wants something to play with, I guess) Ozzie brings us an animal that is apparently not even injured. Not even a little. This has led to a few memorable episodes, one of which involved a huge field rat, a pair of weenie tongs, and a Big Gulp cup.

This last week, Ozzie brought us, at 5:00 in the morning, the above pictured living, healthy flying squirrel, in full vigor. He promptly let it loose. Now, flying squirrels are really cute, as well as fast, and they are jumpy. I’m just here to say, that unless your whole family have chased a flying squirrel aound the house in your pajamas, you have just never had any fun. We were all nearly in tears of laughter by the time the little dickens was succesfully captured (first we had to hustle our domestic furries into various bedrooms, in order to prevent them tearing Francis to bits… that’s what we named it – a fine unisex name, could be "Francis" or "Frances", and, you know, invoking a saint in these situations can never hurt).

The whole point, of course, was to capture Francis without injury. In the end, I managed to pop a Tupperware tub over him, and shortly we all gathered outside in the dark to watch him scamper off. I couldn’t help but think that it was a lot like an alien abduction story, and wondered if he had a family to whom he would have to explain the whole episode. I expect that coming in with the strong scent of cat on your fur would be a little unusual in squirrel society.

Anyway, the operation was successful. We rescued from a grisly end a creature of a species we were not even aware lived in the neighborhood. I always thought flying squirrels were kind of exotic. It turns out they are pretty common, but rarely seen, because they are nocturnal. Nocturnal animals are cool.

FIND OUT MORE ABOUT THESE AMAZING CREATIONS OF GOD.

Model Citizens

Hey, Tim Jones, here.

X1model1 I had the pleasure, lately, of spending a little time with some family who came to visit us from Germany, including a young nephew. I was looking after him for a few hours, and in my increasingly desperate quest to keep his active mind occupied, I discovered that he was interested in model building.

In paroxysms of geeky rapture, I dug out from our junk room a collection of dusty model projects, in various stages of completion. I had begun them with my son, and had worked on them mostly during holiday breaks, but found that he was not such a big fan of model building… at least not the patient assembling, painting, and following directions part. His participation in the actual building process quickly settled into a routine of checking in every half-hour or so to see how things were progressing.

Yeager Because I was partly motivated by dreams of bonding with my son over the smell of model cement and enamel paint, I put the projects aside, time being at something of a premium for me.

Now, in my five-year-old nephew, I saw another potential victim model-building buddy on whom I could hang my pathetic hopes with whom I could share my enthusiasm.

In the end, he did help me glue a couple of pieces, but the most fun was just watching his obvious fascination with the idea of models, and with the finished products.

Rockets While he was here, I managed to complete one project (the X-1) and get started on another that had been in mothballs for years (the U.S. Moon Shot series). I hope to complete a model of every aircraft or spacecraft featured in the movie The Right Stuff, which is one of our family’s favorite films. Both my son and I are aviation buffs. His childhood hero was Chuck Yeager. We have a lot of happy memories tied up in these particular models.

Getting back into my model building was a great deal of fun, brought back some memories for my son and me, and made me feel like a kid again. It also got me to wondering what exactly was the appeal of spending so many precious hours, so much money and frustration on some plastic reproductions that could much more simply be bought on E-bay, or some such.

It occurred to me that in the act of building the models, one gets to know the subject much more thoroughly than before, and becomes more appreciative of the aspects of the project that the builder found attractive to begin with. It also struck me that my admiration for the people involved in the history of these machines – Chuck Yeager, Alan Shepard, John Glenn, all the the Mercury Seven and the Apollo astronauts – was analogous to the way Catholics take the saints as role models… with love and respect for the attributes that made them saints (and that helped them shape history) while remembering that they are human beings. We don’t need to approve of every aspect of a saint’s (or a hero’s) personality in order to give proper recognition to those traits that made them superlative examples from whom we can take inspiration.

Apollobits Having these models around brings to mind the courage, tenacity and brilliance of the men associated with them, just as having images of the saints around helps us to remember the heroes of the faith who came before us. Of course, for Catholics, the Communion of Saints carries the additional dimension of family affection. The saints are our kin. We can call on them for prayers and help, in addition to finding inspiration from their example. Sort of a big spiritual two-fer. In addition, we will one day get to meet the saints in heaven, if we persevere.

I certainly hope to meet these astronauts and pilots in heaven, too. It would be a shame, after spending so much time exploring the heavens, for any of them to miss out on the real thing.

The Peter Pan Treatment

A lot of regular JA.O readers may be already aware of this story, as it is all over the blogosphere and has been discussed on Catholic radio. It poses a number of conundrums and ethical snares concerning the proper medical care of disabled people, elective surgery, and other issues.

According to THIS MSNBC ARTICLE, a young girl named Ashley has undergone surgery, hormone treatment and other medical procedures in order to retard her growth – keep her at her present size and weight – so that caring for her will be easier.

In a case fraught with ethical questions, the parents of a severely mentally and physically disabled child have stunted her growth to keep their little “pillow angel” a manageable and more portable size.

The bedridden 9-year-old girl had her uterus and breast tissue removed at a Seattle hospital and received large doses of hormones to halt her growth. She is now 4-foot-5; her parents say she would otherwise probably reach a normal 5-foot-6.

Now, I’m not an expert in anything, so I don’t feel the need to do a whole boatload of commentary on this. I think the ethical concerns are obvious enough to anyone. I would like to see some thoughtful combox rumination on this (hopefully with the input of some medical professionals, students and ethicists), while avoiding the immediate consigning of the parents to an especially toasty corner of Hell in a knee-jerk fashion. Keep in mind that there are many parents who struggle with the issues of caring for their disabled children , even as these children become disabled adults. Keep your dog on a leash, is what I’m sayin’, and talk about the issues, rather than making personal attacks.

My first response to this story was to think about how many times my wife and I, as we watched our little ones sleeping or doing something especially endearing, wished out loud (mostly kidding) that we could "put a brick on their head" and keep them that age forever. Just stop time and keep our babies forever. It’s an impulse I’m sure we share with a lot of parents.

But that is not what kids are made for. Certainly MY OWN kids would be easier to care for if we had somehow halted their growth. Alzheimer’s patients would be less worrisome if we surgically made them all paraplegics. They could not wander off and become a danger to themselves and others, that way.

Another thought (and this is complete speculation) that occurred to me was the possibility that the parents, subconsciously, may fear that caring for their child will be more challenging as she grows, not because she will no longer be small and light, but because she will no longer be cute, cuddly and sympathetic. There can be a certain tenderness, sweetness and even playfulness in changing a baby’s diaper. The experience of changing the diaper of a fully-grown adult is rather short on rewards, unless one possesses a particularly mature and compassionate spirituality. I am not saying this is the case with Ashley’s parents, but the thought does occur that perhaps the greatest issues may be emotional and mental, rather than physical.

Just some thoughts.

GET THE STORY.

VISIT THE PARENT’S BLOG.