That’s the equation Timothy Garton Ash is hoping for.
Francis Fukuyama explains Ash’s thesis:
In actuality, he writes, Europeans are themselves
divided into Euro-Atlanticists and Euro-Gaullists; the former want
political ties with the U.S. and worry about the statist tendencies of
the European Union, while the latter see the EU as a competitive
counterweight to the U.S. and champion the Brussels version of the
welfare state. (“Janus Britain” is schizophrenically suspended
somewhere between the two.)Americans, for their part, are divided between what have come to be
called red and blue voters. The Left (or blue) side of the American
political spectrum corresponds to the Right, or Atlanticist, side in
Europe, while such quintessentially American characteristics as
anti-statism, gun ownership, and pugnacious hostility to international
institutions are typically to be found only on the red side, the side
that tends to vote Republican.The resulting political Venn diagram thus half-overlaps. Although
Europe is largely devoid of anyone resembling a Republican, and America
has no socialists, both Europe and America have the equivalent of
American Democrats. It is in that intersecting space that Ash sees the
“surprising future” he proclaims in the subtitle of this book—the space
where John Kerry’s America makes common cause with Euro-Atlanticists.
These two forces can, he believes, nudge the U.S. toward greater
multilateralism and Europe toward closer trans-Atlantic cooperation.
But Fukuyama thinks that Ash’s equation won’t work.
Jimmy,
Great post! I really enjoy these kinds of issues (including the links to Sowell’s columns) and want to thank you for bring them to my attention.
Ash’s vision of the future alliance is also hampered by one very important fact: Europeans can not vote on who is president of the U.S.
Good article.