Blogging Note

BTW, I want to apologize for the spotty blogging the last few days. It may last a few days more. Same goes for tardiness in answering e-mail that I’m getting.

The pope’s death has shredded my usual routine, and those late night appearances on Fox, particularly the first (which basically resulted in a five-plus hour period of wakefulness after midnight) has left me feeling quite zombified. I’m trying to get as much rest as I can and conserve my concentration for upcoming media appearances.

New Media Appearance

They’re telling me now that I’m supposed to be on Fox News again with Shepherd Smith between 7 p.m. and 8 p.m. Eastern today.

UPDATE: I’m told the "hit time" for my appearance is approx. 7:40 p.m. Eastern.

UPDATE 2: Ed Peters, Mark Brumley, and Tim O’Donnell are supposed to be on Geraldo at Large (starts at 10 11 p.m. Eastern).

Scary Coincidences #1

It was the largest seagoing vessel of its time. Eight hundred feet long and capable of carrying 3,000 passengers, it was so large that its name evoked the Greek giants, the Titans of legend.

Hulled with steel, the British ship was regarded as "unsinkable," yet en route to New York, one April evening, it was struck by an iceberg on its starboard side around midnight and sank to the ocean floor, causing massive loss of life.

I’m talking about the Titanic, right?

Wrong!

As many readers may know, I’m talking about the Titan–a ship described in the 1898 novel Futility–or–The Wreck of the Titan by Morgan Robertson.

His novel eerily presaged the actual Titanic disaster that would occur in 1912.

After the disaster, Robertson revised the book to make it even more similar to the real-life disaster, but the above parallels were taken from the original edition.

They are only some of several, you can also

READ MORE PARALLELS.

READ ABOUT MORGAN ROBERTSON.

READ ABOUT THE TITANIC DIASTER.

READ THE NOVEL FUTILITY ONLINE.

or

ORDER THE NOVEL FUTILITY AS A CONVERSATION STARTER TO CREEP OUT YOUR FRIENDS AND LET THEM SEE WHAT IT HAS TO SAY FOR THEMSELVES.

Now just wait till I tell you scary coincidence #2!

Interregnum Questions

A reader writes:

Don’t take this the wrong way, I am very sad at the passing of John Paul II. He was a great, great man and leader.

I was just wondering how we are to refer to the prayers for the Pope in the liturgy and for indulgences. Will the church still include, "for our pope John Paul, our bishop N", or will it be generic? Also, when obtaining a plenary indulgence, you must pray for the Holy Father’s intentions. Since JPII is most likely in heaven, do we pray for his intentions? Since he probably is one of the church’s biggest advocates (along with all the former Popes) in heaven.

Just wondering. I have never gone through this before (at least at the age of reason), and was wondering since we will be without a Pope for a couple weeks. Let’s all pray for his successor. He will have HUGE shoes to fill, but I imagine the Holy Spirit will help him out there…

Indeed.

Regarding the two questions you ask, the Sacramentary does not provide a specific option for what to do in an interregnum (period between the reign of two popes). There may be an obscure directive on the books somewhere, but I suspect most priests don’t know it. As a result, I imagine that most priests will either omit the prayer for the pope in Masses in the interregnum or decide on their own backward- or forward-pointing modification.

As far as indulgences, it is not clear to me that plenary indulgences (except the indulgence for the dying) are available in the interregnum since the gaining of one requires prayer for the pope’s intentions. With "the pope" being a null set at the moment, it seems that the matter is ambiguous. It might be that this requirement is in abeyance until there is a new pope, that praying of the the intentions of the former or the coming pope might suffice, or that it is simply not possible to fulfill this condition until the new pontificate. I don’t know of any settled answer on this matter.

Wish I could be of more help.

Media Appearnces

UPDATE: Ed Peters is supposed to be on Fox & Friends at 7:45 a.m. Eastern Sunday.

I’m s’pposed to be on Fox News (by phone) at 3:00 a.m. Eastern Sunday, which will be warped in some time zones by the Spring Forward effect physicists have been saying os much about in recent years.

For those in California, I’m was on the local 24-hour CBS news radio station at 3:10 p.m. local time Saturday. I’m also told they’ll be re-running this interview periodically, but I don’t have info on when or how often.

LINK: http://www.knx1070.com/

Action News!

Years ago when I was doing game design work, I had an idea for a game that I never ran but which I think could have been a lot of fun. The idea was this: A game in which the characters play gung-ho, gonzo TV journalists in a "go anywhere, do anything, get the news at any cost" near-future, semi-post-apocalyptic competitive environment modelled after Edison Carter’s "What I Want To Know" show on Max Headroom.

The title for the game would have been Action News!

One of the gimmics of the news trade in this game would be that the networks would fake the impression that they have studios all over the place by just taking their cameras from town to town, printing up a computerized background with the name of the local city, and pretending that they were "Here at our Podunk Bureau . . . "

In actuality, something like this exists in real life, and I got to sit in such a virtual bureau last night.

When I got a call to appear on Fox News, I assumed that I’d be driving down to the local Fox affiliate, where I’ve appeared before, and that the local station would do the uplink to the network.

Not so.

Instead, the network sent a limo for me (which made it like the second time in my life I’ve ever ridden in a limo), which was a good thing as finding the right place to go at 1 a.m. would not have been a fun thing for me. The right place to go also was not the local Fox affiliate. It was a virtual bureau.

These things exist in every city of significant size. They’re how networks get in-studio interviews with folks in cities that aren’t their major news hubs. I’d known about them, but I’d never been in one before.

The limo guy drove me downtown while I quizzed him about his work. (He was a real nice guy.) When we found the address, we first went past it because it looked like an abandoned walk-down storefront business.

In reality, it was a hole-in-the-wall virtual studio crammed with technical doodads. It had an entry way with a card table with a wrench and socket set sitting on it. A hallway filled with posters that the famous people who’d come there had signed. A bathroom with a folding chair and big mirror for getting hair and make-up right. A dark studio room with an incredibly short office chair, camera, lights, and various backgrounds that could be put behind the guest (including a massive TV for animated backgrounds). And it had an "other" room for the guest and cameraman to wait in where there were lots of rumpled newspapers and electronics and computer equipment.

There was just one cameraman. He was the only guy there. He wasn’t even the usual cameraman since it was the usual cameraman’s birthday. But he was a real nice guy and he got us hooked up to Fox in New York just fine.

The virtual studio, y’see, doesn’t just serve one network. They’s the local San Diego contact point for any national cable show that needs a live remote guest hookup. The cameraman told me they’d done Larry King there, they did a bunch for Fox News there, and the other folks. In fact, I realized, I was sitting in the same chair Sean Hannity had been sitting in a week or so ago, when I’d seen him sitting against the same pull-down San Diego night time skyline background I was now sitting in front of.

At least on Fox (I don’t know about other networks) the attitude toward the pope’s passing has, overall, been respectful and wanting to celebrate the holy father and many of the things he’s done, even though they do want to ask those "probing" politically-oriented questions.

They got me wired up with a mic and an earpiece and I listened as various folks in New York talked to me, asked me questions (usually whether I could hear them), and handed me electronically from one department to another while we waited for the segment I was to be on to roll around.

It did. I got asked several questions by the host, who also talked to Tim Gray by phone. (You mean I could have stayed home and phoned this in instead of coming down after midnight???) I got asked one question I particularly wanted to be asked (the gist of which was "Is the pope a hidebound conservative?", letting me have the opportunity to contrast what is essential from non-essential in the faith and characterizing John Paul II’s approach as "faithful openness").

And then it was all over.

The cameraman unhooked me, signed off to New York, I called the limo driver to come pick me up, and a few minutes later I was on my way home.

The limo guy was particularly jazzed by the whole experience. He’d gone back to headquarters while I was waiting to go on the air and he caught my segment on TV. He thought I came across as very calm and in control of what I wanted to say. He had known I was going to be on TV, but something about seeing it make it click for him, and I was tickled at how excited he was afterward. Said getting to meet a "celebrity" had made his night.

I just chuckled at that and rolled my eyes in the dark.

But the experience brought back memories of Action News!

Sin City

A reader writes:

Dear Jimmy,

This has been a rough day in a rough week and the news from the Vatican has me totally bummed out. What to do? I had a spare moment and thought that a little distraction would help. I like Bruce Willis. I like Tarantino. I decided to see Sin City.

This movie is one of the worst things to see with the eyes. It is very anti-establishment and has some real over-the-top anti-Catholic moments in it as well. It sickens me that in this time of crisis, I cannot go to a simple movie without being blasted by the hatred of some adolescent mind.

Anywho, my advice: do not see this fifty-pound monkey that sits on your head relentlessly banging it … I mean, movie.

Sin Cerely,
Namewithheld

A thought: I don’t know what movies are playing right now, but one can still see movies that aren’t Evil. May I suggest The Incredibles (just out on DVD)? It’s InconceivableIncredible!

Thanks for the warning about fifty-pound monkeysmovies!

Papal Update Links

A reader writes:

Would you please advise us to any reputable links to keep us updated on the Pope’s condition?

I’m afraid that I don’t know of anything that will give up-to-the-moment updates from a reliable Catholic perspective, so let me make several recommendations that may serve together:

CATHOLIC WORLD NEWS

A GOOGLE NEWS SEARCH CONFIGURED FOR THE MOST RECENT STORIES FEATURING THE WORDS "POPE" AND "DIED."

And your humble blog.

Incidentally, here’s TODAY’S SHOW ON CATHOLIC ANSWERS LIVE, which was devoted to the topic (LISTENDOWNLOAD).

Also, it looks as if I may be appearing on Fox News between 4:30 and 5:30 5-6 a.m. Eastern for the few who might be up then or want to tape it.

Likely the first of a number of media appearances for Catholic Answers folks in coming days, though we’ll have to see.