Why Don’t We Call Moses and Elijah “Saint”?

If Moses and Elijah were present in the Transfiguration, why don't we call them saints?

Recently I received the question: “Why don’t we call Moses and Elijah ‘Saint'”?

In other words: Why aren’t they referred to as St. Moses and St. Elijah?

Evidence for Sainthood

After all, we have it on pretty good authority that they are holy and in heaven.

Both Old and New Testament attest to the holiness of both individuals. We have a clear indication that Elijah was taken directly into heaven, without dying, and while Moses did die, there’s no serious doubt about his making it to heaven (at least after heaven was generally opened to the righteous of the Old Testament).

Most impressively, both Moses and Elijah get to appear with Jesus in the Transfiguration.

That’s kind of a giveaway.

So why don’t we call them saints?

Old Testament Saints in General

A basic answer would be that we tend not to use the honorific “Saint” for human beings who lived in the Old Testament period.

We do use it for angels we read about in the Old Testament–St. Michael, St. Gabriel, St. Raphael–but not human beings.

That is probably just an artifact of how the term “Saint” evolved. Originally it was an adjective, meaning “holy” (Latin, sanctus). People started prefixing it to the names of notably holy individuals (holy Peter, holy Paul), and eventually it came to be used as an honorific–like “Mister” or “Doctor” (thus St. Peter, St. Paul).

But for whatever reason, people tended not to do this for Old Testament figures.

Perhaps this was because holy figures of the Old Testament were thought to already be sufficiently hallowed by their inclusion in Scripture–although that would not explain why the apostles and other New Testament figures got the title “Saint.”

More likely, Old Testament figures were seen as less directly relevant as examples to Christians, because they lived before the Christian age. Those living in the Christian age, like the apostles and later saints, are more like us and thus more direct examples for us in a certain sense.

However that may be, Old Testament figures were generally not called “Saint.”

But sometimes they were. . . .

Meet St. Moses and St. Elijah

The Latin Church maintains an official list of saints and blesseds known as the Roman Martyrology, and it actually lists some humans from the Old Testament, including Moses and Elijah.

Here is part of the entry for September 4:

On Mount Nebo, in the land of Moab, [was the death of] the holy lawgiver and prophet Moses.

And here is part of the entry for July 20:

On Mount Carmel, [was the departure of] the holy prophet Elijah.

Latin or English?

The Roman Martyrology, of course, is in Latin, and the translation offered above is accomodated to standard English usage, which avoids using “Saint” for Moses and Elijah. The Latin original is a bit different.

Here is  the Latin for these two entries, along with a more word-for-word translation:

In monte Nebo, terræ Moab, sancti Móysis, legislatóris et Prophétæ.

On Mt. Nebo, of the land of Moab, [was the death] of saint Moses, lawgiver and Prophet.

In monte Carmélo sancti Elíæ Prophétæ.

On Mt. Carmel [was the departure] of saint Elijah the Prophet.

This is the same construction that is used to report the deaths of other saints in the Matyrology. For example, a bit later on September 4th, we read:

Tréviris sancti Marcélli, Epíscopi et Mártyris.

Which would be:

At Treves [was the death] of saint Marcellus, Bishop and Martyr.

You might note that the term “saint” is lower-case in the Latin, and you might argue from that that it should be translated as an adjective–“holy”–but the point is that the Martyrology is applying to Moses and Elijah the same terminology that it applies to other saints.

It’s listing them in the same way, despite the fact that they’re Old Testament figures.

And then there’s this . . .

Meet Mar Musa and Mar Elia

English and Latin aren’t the only two languages in the Church, and the Latin Church isn’t the only body in union with the pope. Consider, for example, the Chaldean Church, which is one of the Eastern Catholic churches.

It uses a dialect of Aramaic as its liturgical language, and it refers to Moses and Elijah as saints, using the standard Aramatic term fors “saint”–“mar”–as a title for both of them.

They are referred to as “Mar Musa” (St. Moses) and “Mar Elia” (St. Elijah).

You will find various Chaldean institutions, like churches and monasteries, named after them the same way you find them named after other saints.

And Mar Musa and Mar Elia don’t just have particular days celebrating them on the Chaldean liturgical calendar. They actually have liturgical seasons devoted to them.

I should note that the term “mar” also has other meanings. Its root meaning is “lord.” And you can see it in the term “maranatha” (Marana tha = “Our Lord, come!”).

By extension it also is used as a title for saints, as with Mar Musa, Mar Elia, and all the other saints honored in the Chaldean Church.

Finally, it is also used as a title for bishops, but nobody is under the impression that Moses and Elijah were bishops.

We thus have to be a bit careful about who the “we” is when we ask why we don’t refer to Moses and Elijah as saints.

Some of us do, because the practice can vary from one language to another and from one Catholic rite to another.

The Texas Tower Sniper Incident

Did You Know? The “Texas Tower Sniper” incident occurred Aug. 1, 1966, when the deranged gunman Charles J. Whitman opened fire at the University of Texas in Austin, killing 16 and wounding 32. I was there, though I was a baby, with my mother in student housing (if I have my family stories correct). My father was closer, in another building, and when the gunfire rang out, people in the room where he was rushed to the window to see what was happening. My father instead stepped back. LEARN MORE.

Final Solution Ordered

Did You Know? Under instructions from Adolf Hitler, Nazi official Hermann Göring, ordered SS General Reinhard Heydrich to “submit to me as soon as possible a general plan of the administrative material and financial measures necessary for carrying out the desired final solution of the Jewish question.” The date was July 31, 1941. LEARN MORE.

Dude, Your Made-Up God Has a Measuring Cup on His Head

Did You Know? When the Greeks gained control of ancient Egypt, Pharaoh Ptolemy I (who was Greek) invented a Greek-style Egyptian god to try and unite the two peoples. Unlike the animal-headed gods of Egypt, Serapis was depicted as a man, but his head wasn’t entirely normal. He was depicted with a basket used for measuring grain on his head. Go figure. LEARN MORE.

I Guess We Know the Last Part of His History

Did You Know? Joseph Smith is reported to have said “No man knows my history,” but we do know some of it. On June 27, 1844 he died in a gunbattle after shooting and wounding three members of a lynch mob while incarcerated in the Carthage, Illinois jail. He was in jail because he had previously ordered the destruction of a newspaper in Nauvoo, Illinois after its first (and only) edition was critical of him. Despite the circumstances of his death, he is often portrayed as a martyr by Mormons. LEARN MORE.

Cool! New Secret Club Endorsement!

Awesome!

I just received a new endorsement for the Secret Information Club from Deacon Harold Burke-Sivers (“the Dynamic Deacon”), who writes:

I joined Jimmy Akin’s Secret Information Club a while back, and I thought you might like it.

It’s fun and informative. Jimmy sends out information about the Catholic faith and makes it easier to understand.

Tell him the deacon sent you!

Deacon Harold Burke-Sivers
www.DeaconHarold.com

I’m always delighted when fellow Catholic professionals recognize the effort I’m putting into the Secret Information Club and trying to make it fun and informative for everyone.

Thank you, Deacon Harold!

If you’d like to see what “the Dynamic Deacon” is talking about, be sure to check out www.SecretInfoClub.com or just sign up using this handy signup form:

What is the Secret Information Club?

Are You a Hater or a Bigot? Or Are You Just Intolerant?

A reader writes:

I had a question that I needed to ask you. I just found out that the owner of Chick-Fil-A stated that he was against Gay Marriage. Personally, I agree with him, yet when I told someone on the Chick-Fil-A Facebook page that being against Gay Marriage isn’t the same as being “Anti-Gay”, they ended up calling me a “Hateful bigot”.

Does being against Gay Marriage automatically make me a hateful person or oppressive person?

I don’t try to hate anyone and I don’t want to be seen as hateful by others. I just feel conflicted. If you can help me understand how to resolve this conflicted feeling that I’m currently having, I would be very thankful!

It is difficult to know what to say the first time one encounters this type of claim, which is regrettably common.

Hatred and bigotry are real phenomena. They really exist. And they are evil.

It is natural to want to avoid them and to want to avoid being perceived as committing them. That is true in everywhere, but it is particularly true in our own culture, which highly prizes tolerance, understanding, and letting people “do their own thing.”

Precisely because there is such a strong aversion to these things in our culture, there is a perverse phenomenon that also occurs in which charges of hatred, bigotry, and intolerance are used to perversely express and create intolerance.

This occurs when accusing someone of these faults is done as a way of shutting down rational discussion, of stifling disagreement, and of wounding (emotionally or socially) the one against whom the charges are made.

People who make blanket charges of hatred, bigotry, and intolerance are themselves being intolerant, displaying bigotry, and may even be hateful.

Why do I say this?

KEEP READING.