Rat "Brain" Flies "Plane"

BraindishthumExcerpts:

Somewhere in Florida, 25,000 disembodied rat neurons are thinking about flying an F-22.

These neurons are growing on top of a multi-electrode array and form a living “brain” that’s hooked up to a flight simulator on a desktop computer. When information on the simulated aircraft’s horizontal and vertical movements are fed into the brain by stimulating the electrodes, the neurons fire away in patterns that are then used to control its “body” — the simulated aircraft.

Currently the brain has learned enough to be able to control the pitch and roll of the simulated F-22 fighter jet in weather conditions ranging from blue skies to hurricane-force winds. Initially the aircraft drifted, because the brain hadn’t figured out how to control its “body,” but over time the neurons learned to stabilize the aircraft to a straight, level flight.

“Right now the process it’s learning is very simplistic,” said DeMarse. “It’s basically making a decision about whether to move the stick to the left or to the right or forwards and backwards and it learns how much to push the stick depending upon how badly the aircraft is flying.”

The bigger goal is to figure out how neurons talk to each other. MRI scans, for example, show millions of neurons firing together. At that resolution, it is impossible to see what’s happening between individual neurons. While scientists can study neural activities from groups of cells in a dish, they can’t watch them learn and grow as they would within a living body unless the neurons have some kind of body to interact with.

By taking these cells and giving them back a “body,” the researchers hope to uncover how the neurons communicate with each other and eventually translate that knowledge to develop novel computing architecture.

GET THE STORY FROM WIRED.

MORE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA.

And this just in from UNIVERSE TODAY:

In related news, EarthForce defense contractors announced project aimed at creating a powerful “shadow” warship using a human being as its central processing unit.

“We’re very excited about the new shadow ship,” said Gen. Wink Tinkley of EarthForce. “Using a human being as the CPU means a lot more computing than a simulated rat brain has. The only problem we’ve found is that telepaths can interfere with the human’s neural connection with the ship.”

EarthForce contractors also announced the creation of an even more ambitious program which will allow a detachable human as a ship’s CPU. When perfect, this pilot program will allow humans who pilot such ships–known as “pilots”–to live normal lives by being extracted from their ships at the end of missions.

Rat “Brain” Flies “Plane”

BraindishthumExcerpts:

Somewhere in Florida, 25,000 disembodied rat neurons are thinking about flying an F-22.

These neurons are growing on top of a multi-electrode array and form a living “brain” that’s hooked up to a flight simulator on a desktop computer. When information on the simulated aircraft’s horizontal and vertical movements are fed into the brain by stimulating the electrodes, the neurons fire away in patterns that are then used to control its “body” — the simulated aircraft.

Currently the brain has learned enough to be able to control the pitch and roll of the simulated F-22 fighter jet in weather conditions ranging from blue skies to hurricane-force winds. Initially the aircraft drifted, because the brain hadn’t figured out how to control its “body,” but over time the neurons learned to stabilize the aircraft to a straight, level flight.

“Right now the process it’s learning is very simplistic,” said DeMarse. “It’s basically making a decision about whether to move the stick to the left or to the right or forwards and backwards and it learns how much to push the stick depending upon how badly the aircraft is flying.”

The bigger goal is to figure out how neurons talk to each other. MRI scans, for example, show millions of neurons firing together. At that resolution, it is impossible to see what’s happening between individual neurons. While scientists can study neural activities from groups of cells in a dish, they can’t watch them learn and grow as they would within a living body unless the neurons have some kind of body to interact with.

By taking these cells and giving them back a “body,” the researchers hope to uncover how the neurons communicate with each other and eventually translate that knowledge to develop novel computing architecture.

GET THE STORY FROM WIRED.

MORE FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA.

And this just in from UNIVERSE TODAY:

In related news, EarthForce defense contractors announced project aimed at creating a powerful “shadow” warship using a human being as its central processing unit.

“We’re very excited about the new shadow ship,” said Gen. Wink Tinkley of EarthForce. “Using a human being as the CPU means a lot more computing than a simulated rat brain has. The only problem we’ve found is that telepaths can interfere with the human’s neural connection with the ship.”

EarthForce contractors also announced the creation of an even more ambitious program which will allow a detachable human as a ship’s CPU. When perfect, this pilot program will allow humans who pilot such ships–known as “pilots”–to live normal lives by being extracted from their ships at the end of missions.

Media Updates

A friendly reader posted a link to where my appearances on Family News In Focus responding to Sen. Kerry’s speech involving religion can be found:

IT’S HERE. (.wax format; works with Windows Media Player; my segment starts a little after 3:30 minutes into the broadcast)

I also was able to find a link to my appearance on California NRP talking about stem cells:

IT’S HERE. (.asx format; works with Windows Media Player; my segment starts about 20 minutes into the hour)

This morning I’m sheduled to appear on XETV FOX channel 6 (the local San Diego FOX station) to talk about stem cells again. I should be on about 7:15 a.m., though the segment should be short.

MORE INFO ON CALIFORNIA’S PRO-STEM CELL PROP 71 HERE.

If it gets passed in this state, it will create competition among other states to fund similar initiatives, lest they get left behind in a “stem cell race.”

Escatology Update

A reader points out to me that . . . .

ANDREW SULLIVAN PRINTS AN E-MAIL CALLING INTO QUESTION THE LITERALNESS OF LUTHER’S STATEMENT THAT HE HAD HIS PROFOUND, REFORMATIONAL INSIGHT IN CLOACA.

(POTTY-MOUTH WARNING!)

Don’t know whether this is true or not, but it might be.

I also should point out something I forgot to mention the other day: The stories you read about Luther posting the 95 Theses on a church door may well be false.

More On Mentalese

Regarding our recent discussion of deafness and mentalese, a reader writes:

But what about deaf people who don’t know sign language? I recently read an article that claimed a surprising number of deaf people don’t know sign language, or at least don’t know it very well, especially deaf children who grow up with parents who have normal hearing. So how do they think? Or what about deaf people in remote areas who never encounter sign language? They are obviously thinking somehow but what form do the thoughts take?

If a person were totally deprived of language–both spoken, gestural, and anything else one might propose–then the person would have no option but to think in pure mentalese.

That being said, it isn’t clear to me how common completely language-less people are. I question whether they even exist. The language instinct is so strong in humans that the accounts I have read indicate that even deaf people not exposed to a formal sign languages come up with informal signs.

Recently I was reading an account of a deaf man from Mexico who was never exposed to formal signing. This gentleman not only was able to get across the border with the United States, he was able to survive in the Los Angeles area. When he was discovered, he did not know any established language, including sign languages. An effort was made to teach him a sign language, and soon he “made the breakthrough.” Afterwards, he not only was able to describe his prior experience, he also was able to lead those working with him to other non-signing deaf individuals, who were more common than had been known.

These individuals had a network amongst themselves that had previously escaped notice. Despite their lack of conventional language, they had found ways to communicate with each other and often entertained each others with elaborate pantomimes describing their experiences.

This suggests that the language instinct in humans is so strong that even in the absence of exposure to a formal language, they will come up with an informal one.

This suggests that even these individuals may not think in pure mentalese but might have an accompanying “translation” of their thoughts into the informal gestural methods of communication they invent.

It would be fascinating to have better data on this, however.

Escatology Update

A reader points out to me that . . . .

ANDREW SULLIVAN PRINTS AN E-MAIL CALLING INTO QUESTION THE LITERALNESS OF LUTHER’S STATEMENT THAT HE HAD HIS PROFOUND, REFORMATIONAL INSIGHT IN CLOACA.

(POTTY-MOUTH WARNING!)

Don’t know whether this is true or not, but it might be.

I also should point out something I forgot to mention the other day: The stories you read about Luther posting the 95 Theses on a church door may well be false.

Compendium Question

A reader writes:

Can you give us some guidance on your blog regarding the new Compendium [of the Church’s social teachings] that came out this week?

How do we answer critics who say that it elevates lesser social issues to a position on par with pro-life issues?

I am very reluctant to comment on a text without having the chance to examine it firsthand. This is why I haven’t commented on the Comendium thus far. For an unknown reason, it doesn’t seem to have yet been posted online, and although I put in a request to have a hardcopy shipped to us extra-expedited, it hasn’t yet arrived (probably will arrive late this week or early next), and I’ll be in a better position to comment at that time.

Despite this, the question that you pose is one that I can comment on at least briefly, as follows:

It would be almost inconceivable, given the stress that the Holy See has placed on abortion and related pro-life questions (euthanasia, embryonic stem cells, etc.), that the text would elevate lesser social issues to the point that they are on the same level as these.

Basically, people who are saying that it does this (a) are commenting on the text without having read it themselves and (b) commenting on it in a particularly brain-dead way, as it would be completely contrary to the way that Rome has been speaking about the relative gravity of these issues.

HERE’S A STORY THAT ALSO MAY BE USEFUL.

AND HERE’S ANOTHER.

Lunar Eclipse Tonight!

LunareclipseThere’s going to be a total eclipse of the moon tonight, and North America has the best seat in the house for it.

You may be able to catch the eclipse on FOX, as it will occur during the World Series game that FOX is broadcasting.

For full viewing instructions, including when totality will occur in your timezone, as well as background on what a lunar eclipse is, etc., GO HERE.

For those in the continental US, totality (which lasts less than 5 min.) will occur at 7:18 Pacific, 8:18 Mountain, 9:18 Central, and 10:18 Eastern.

Enjoy!

P.S. Unlike an eclipse of the sun, you can look directly at an eclipse of the moon!

Chaput Wants Abortion Kaput

Excerts from NYT editorial by the good Archbishop:

Words are cheap. Actions matter. If we believe in the sanctity of life from conception to natural death, we need to prove that by our actions, including our political choices. Anything less leads to the corruption of our integrity. Patriotism, which is a virtue for people of all faiths, requires that we fight, ethically and nonviolently, for what we believe. Claiming that “we don’t want to impose our beliefs on society” is not merely politically convenient; it is morally incoherent and irresponsible.

As James 2:17 reminds us, in a passage quoted in the final presidential debate, “Faith without works is dead.” It is a valid point. People should act on what they claim to believe. Otherwise they are violating their own conscience, and lying to themselves and the rest of us.

Schwing!

READ THE EDITORIAL (Evil NYT-noid Registration Warning).

UPDATE: BTW, I should mention that Archbishop Chaput’s last name does not rhyme with “kaput.” The T on the end of his name is silent and the U is long.